Evaluation of SWAT Model in Runoff Simulation Using Rainfall and Temperature Derived From Satellite Images

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Mohammd Tavosi, Mehdi Vafakhah, Vahid Moosavi
{"title":"Evaluation of SWAT Model in Runoff Simulation Using Rainfall and Temperature Derived From Satellite Images","authors":"Mohammd Tavosi, Mehdi Vafakhah, Vahid Moosavi","doi":"10.1007/s40996-024-01597-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate simulation of hydrological processes in watersheds is of great importance. The accuracy of rainfall and temperature data plays a crucial role as effective inputs in hydrological models, such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, significantly impacting the accuracy of the model outputs. This is despite the insufficiency of climatological stations in watersheds. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the SWAT model in runoff simulation using rainfall and temperature from ground stations in comparison with the data derived from satellite images. To do this, rainfall and surface temperature data were extracted the number of 14,608 images from three-hour Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) product and the number of 1826 images from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) products in Taleghan dam watershed, from 2009 to 2015. Minimum and maximum daily air temperatures were estimated from Land Surface Temperature (LST) data through multiple regression analysis. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was executed under four different scenarios: the first involved using rainfall and temperature data exclusively from ground stations, in the second, rainfall was sourced from TRMM images and temperature from ground stations, the third strategy combined ground station rainfall data with MODIS temperature data, and the fourth strategy utilized satellite-derived data for both rainfall and temperature inputs. Findings from the study revealed that the SWAT model demonstrated the most accurate runoff simulations when incorporating satellite-derived data. Specifically, the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values were 0.67 and 0.83 for daily and monthly time scales, respectively, indicating superior performance compared to using solely ground station data. When ground station data alone were employed, the NSE values were slightly lower at 0.62 and 0.7 for daily and monthly time scales, respectively. These results underscore the effectiveness of utilizing satellite-derived data as inputs for hydrological models, particularly in regions where there is a scarcity of observational data. This suggests that satellite data can play a crucial role in enhancing the accuracy and reliability of hydrological modeling, offering valuable insights for improved water resource management in data-constrained environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":14550,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01597-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate simulation of hydrological processes in watersheds is of great importance. The accuracy of rainfall and temperature data plays a crucial role as effective inputs in hydrological models, such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, significantly impacting the accuracy of the model outputs. This is despite the insufficiency of climatological stations in watersheds. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the SWAT model in runoff simulation using rainfall and temperature from ground stations in comparison with the data derived from satellite images. To do this, rainfall and surface temperature data were extracted the number of 14,608 images from three-hour Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) product and the number of 1826 images from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) products in Taleghan dam watershed, from 2009 to 2015. Minimum and maximum daily air temperatures were estimated from Land Surface Temperature (LST) data through multiple regression analysis. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was executed under four different scenarios: the first involved using rainfall and temperature data exclusively from ground stations, in the second, rainfall was sourced from TRMM images and temperature from ground stations, the third strategy combined ground station rainfall data with MODIS temperature data, and the fourth strategy utilized satellite-derived data for both rainfall and temperature inputs. Findings from the study revealed that the SWAT model demonstrated the most accurate runoff simulations when incorporating satellite-derived data. Specifically, the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values were 0.67 and 0.83 for daily and monthly time scales, respectively, indicating superior performance compared to using solely ground station data. When ground station data alone were employed, the NSE values were slightly lower at 0.62 and 0.7 for daily and monthly time scales, respectively. These results underscore the effectiveness of utilizing satellite-derived data as inputs for hydrological models, particularly in regions where there is a scarcity of observational data. This suggests that satellite data can play a crucial role in enhancing the accuracy and reliability of hydrological modeling, offering valuable insights for improved water resource management in data-constrained environments.

Abstract Image

利用卫星图像得出的降雨量和温度对 SWAT 模型在径流模拟中的应用进行评估
准确模拟流域水文过程非常重要。降雨量和温度数据作为水文模型(如水土评估工具(SWAT)模型)的有效输入,其准确性起着至关重要的作用,对模型输出结果的准确性有重大影响。尽管流域内的气候观测站数量不足。因此,本研究旨在利用地面站提供的降雨量和温度数据与卫星图像数据进行比较,评估 SWAT 模型在径流模拟方面的效果。为此,研究人员从 2009 年至 2015 年期间塔勒汗坝流域三小时热带降雨量测量任务(TRMM)产品的 14608 幅图像和中分辨率成像分光仪(MODIS)产品的 1826 幅图像中提取了降雨量和地表温度数据。通过多元回归分析,从陆地表面温度(LST)数据中估算出每日最低和最高气温。水土评估工具(SWAT)模型在四种不同方案下执行:第一种方案完全使用地面站的降雨量和温度数据;第二种方案降雨量来自 TRMM 图像,温度来自地面站;第三种方案将地面站降雨量数据与 MODIS 温度数据相结合;第四种方案利用卫星数据输入降雨量和温度。研究结果表明,SWAT 模型在结合卫星数据时模拟的径流最为准确。具体而言,日时间尺度和月时间尺度的纳什-萨特克利夫效率(NSE)值分别为 0.67 和 0.83,表明其性能优于仅使用地面站数据的情况。仅使用地面站数据时,日和月时间尺度的 NSE 值分别为 0.62 和 0.7,略低于此值。这些结果凸显了利用卫星数据作为水文模型输入的有效性,尤其是在观测数据稀缺的地区。这表明,卫星数据可在提高水文模型的准确性和可靠性方面发挥关键作用,为在数据有限的环境中改进水资源管理提供宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
203
期刊介绍: The aim of the Iranian Journal of Science and Technology is to foster the growth of scientific research among Iranian engineers and scientists and to provide a medium by means of which the fruits of these researches may be brought to the attention of the world’s civil Engineering communities. This transaction focuses on all aspects of Civil Engineering and will accept the original research contributions (previously unpublished) from all areas of established engineering disciplines. The papers may be theoretical, experimental or both. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering which include, but are not limited to, the following: -Structural engineering- Earthquake engineering- Concrete engineering- Construction management- Steel structures- Engineering mechanics- Water resources engineering- Hydraulic engineering- Hydraulic structures- Environmental engineering- Soil mechanics- Foundation engineering- Geotechnical engineering- Transportation engineering- Surveying and geomatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信