Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer with high tumor burden at biopsy: lessons learned from a contemporary radical prostatectomy cohort

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Jauffray Oliva, Vassili Anastay, Michael Baboudjian, Mathieu Roumiguié, Alexandre Peltier, Charles Dariane, Gaelle Fiard, Thierry Roumeguère, Romain Diamand, Mohamed Bakhri, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Thibaut Long-Depaquit, Guillaume Ploussard, Alessandro Uleri
{"title":"Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer with high tumor burden at biopsy: lessons learned from a contemporary radical prostatectomy cohort","authors":"Jauffray Oliva, Vassili Anastay, Michael Baboudjian, Mathieu Roumiguié, Alexandre Peltier, Charles Dariane, Gaelle Fiard, Thierry Roumeguère, Romain Diamand, Mohamed Bakhri, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Thibaut Long-Depaquit, Guillaume Ploussard, Alessandro Uleri","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05227-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>To investigate whether initial tumor burden at biopsy could predict adverse features after radical prostatectomy (RP) in International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 1 prostate cancer (PCa) patients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study was conducted in six referral centers. The cohort included patients with ISUP 1 PCa at systematic and MRI-targeted biopsy. We defined a high tumor burden at biopsy if ≥ 20% of cores were positive. The endpoint of the study was adverse features at RP, defined as ≥ pT3a stage and/or N1 and/or ISUP ≥ 3. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess associations between different thresholds on biopsy (percentage of positive cores [PPC] ≥ 25%, ≥ 33%, ≥ 50%, bilateral positivity and positive cores &gt; 3) and adverse features. As the number of targeted biopsies sampled may influence the number of positive cores, we used a virtual biopsy model in which all targeted biopsy results were interpreted as a single targeted biopsy.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 312 contemporary patients were included. At final pathology, 99 patients (32%) had adverse features. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, there was no statistical association between PPC &gt; 20% and adverse features (OR = 1.22; 95%CI:0.69–2.22, <i>p</i> = 0.5). In sensitivity analysis, tumor burden at biopsy was not associated with the risk of adverse features, regardless of the definition used (all <i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). When we considered a unique virtual targeted biopsy, tumor burden remained not associated with adverse features (all <i>p</i> &gt; 0.05).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>ISUP 1 PCa tumor burden at biopsy did not predict adverse features in this study, suggesting that it should not be used alone as an exclusion criterion when assessing eligibility for active surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05227-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

To investigate whether initial tumor burden at biopsy could predict adverse features after radical prostatectomy (RP) in International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 1 prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted in six referral centers. The cohort included patients with ISUP 1 PCa at systematic and MRI-targeted biopsy. We defined a high tumor burden at biopsy if ≥ 20% of cores were positive. The endpoint of the study was adverse features at RP, defined as ≥ pT3a stage and/or N1 and/or ISUP ≥ 3. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess associations between different thresholds on biopsy (percentage of positive cores [PPC] ≥ 25%, ≥ 33%, ≥ 50%, bilateral positivity and positive cores > 3) and adverse features. As the number of targeted biopsies sampled may influence the number of positive cores, we used a virtual biopsy model in which all targeted biopsy results were interpreted as a single targeted biopsy.

Results

A total of 312 contemporary patients were included. At final pathology, 99 patients (32%) had adverse features. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, there was no statistical association between PPC > 20% and adverse features (OR = 1.22; 95%CI:0.69–2.22, p = 0.5). In sensitivity analysis, tumor burden at biopsy was not associated with the risk of adverse features, regardless of the definition used (all p > 0.05). When we considered a unique virtual targeted biopsy, tumor burden remained not associated with adverse features (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions

ISUP 1 PCa tumor burden at biopsy did not predict adverse features in this study, suggesting that it should not be used alone as an exclusion criterion when assessing eligibility for active surveillance.

对活检时肿瘤负荷较高的低风险前列腺癌进行主动监测:从当代根治性前列腺切除术队列中汲取的经验教训
简介:研究活检时的初始肿瘤负荷能否预测国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)1级前列腺癌(PCa)患者根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后的不良特征。研究对象包括系统性活检和磁共振成像靶向活检的 ISUP 1 PCa 患者。如果活检时有≥20%的核芯呈阳性,我们就将其定义为高肿瘤负荷。研究终点是 RP 时的不良特征,定义为≥ pT3a 分期和/或 N1 和/或 ISUP ≥ 3。研究人员进行了敏感性分析,以评估不同活检阈值(阳性核芯百分比[PPC]≥25%、≥33%、≥50%、双侧阳性和阳性核芯> 3)与不良特征之间的关联。由于取样的靶向活检次数可能会影响阳性核芯的数量,我们采用了虚拟活检模型,将所有靶向活检结果解释为一次靶向活检。最终病理结果显示,99 例患者(32%)出现不良特征。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,PPC > 20% 与不良特征之间没有统计学关联(OR = 1.22; 95%CI:0.69-2.22, p = 0.5)。在敏感性分析中,无论使用哪种定义,活检时的肿瘤负荷与不良特征的风险均无关联(均为 p >0.05)。结论ISUP 1 PCa活检时的肿瘤负荷并不能预测本研究中的不良特征,这表明在评估主动监测的资格时,肿瘤负荷不应单独作为排除标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信