Dyadic Associations Between Self and Peer Engagement in Online Alcohol-Facilitative Communication and College Student Drinking

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Gregory E. Chase, Andrea M. Hussong, Michaeline Jensen
{"title":"Dyadic Associations Between Self and Peer Engagement in Online Alcohol-Facilitative Communication and College Student Drinking","authors":"Gregory E. Chase, Andrea M. Hussong, Michaeline Jensen","doi":"10.1177/21676968241280090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a sample of 562 college student peer dyads ( M<jats:sub> age</jats:sub> = 20.47, SD = 1.26; 65.7% female; 68.8% White), this study investigates how college student engagement (both their own and their peer’s) in online alcohol-facilitative communication is associated with frequency of past year drinking. Data were drawn from a study conducted in 2016–2018 in the Southeastern United States. Actor-partner interdependence models suggest that college students who engaged in more alcohol-facilitative communication, and whose peer engaged in more alcohol-facilitative communication, drank more frequently and more heavily than those students who engaged in less alcohol-facilitative communication (even when controlling for their peer's offline drinking). Moreover, college student engagement in online alcohol-facilitative communication was a stronger predictor of their own drinking than their peer's engagement. The hypothesized interaction between self- and peer-reported alcohol-facilitative communication did not emerge overall, though exploratory analyses of specific subdimensions of alcohol-facilitative communication suggested a potential ceiling effect.","PeriodicalId":47330,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Adulthood","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Adulthood","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968241280090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a sample of 562 college student peer dyads ( M age = 20.47, SD = 1.26; 65.7% female; 68.8% White), this study investigates how college student engagement (both their own and their peer’s) in online alcohol-facilitative communication is associated with frequency of past year drinking. Data were drawn from a study conducted in 2016–2018 in the Southeastern United States. Actor-partner interdependence models suggest that college students who engaged in more alcohol-facilitative communication, and whose peer engaged in more alcohol-facilitative communication, drank more frequently and more heavily than those students who engaged in less alcohol-facilitative communication (even when controlling for their peer's offline drinking). Moreover, college student engagement in online alcohol-facilitative communication was a stronger predictor of their own drinking than their peer's engagement. The hypothesized interaction between self- and peer-reported alcohol-facilitative communication did not emerge overall, though exploratory analyses of specific subdimensions of alcohol-facilitative communication suggested a potential ceiling effect.
自己和同伴参与在线酒精辅导交流与大学生饮酒之间的双向关系
本研究以562个大学生同伴为样本(中位年龄=20.47,标差=1.26;65.7%为女性;68.8%为白人),调查了大学生(自己和同伴)参与在线酒精辅导交流与过去一年饮酒频率之间的关系。数据来自 2016-2018 年在美国东南部进行的一项研究。行为者-伙伴相互依存模型表明,与参与酒精辅导交流较少的学生相比,参与酒精辅导交流较多的大学生以及其同伴参与酒精辅导交流较多的大学生饮酒更频繁、更严重(即使控制了其同伴的线下饮酒情况)。此外,大学生参与在线酒精辅导交流比参与同伴交流更能预测他们自己的酗酒情况。尽管对酒精辅导交流的特定子维度进行的探索性分析表明可能存在天花板效应,但自我报告的酒精辅导交流与同伴报告的酒精辅导交流之间的交互作用假设并没有在总体上出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emerging Adulthood
Emerging Adulthood Multiple-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
19.20%
发文量
87
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信