Quantification of multi-level residual drift ratios of RC bridge piers based on traffic flow capacity and its application in seismic failure assessment of RC bridge piers with EDBs

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Huihui Dong, Hui Huang, Rui Ma, Xiuli Du, Qiang Han
{"title":"Quantification of multi-level residual drift ratios of RC bridge piers based on traffic flow capacity and its application in seismic failure assessment of RC bridge piers with EDBs","authors":"Huihui Dong,&nbsp;Hui Huang,&nbsp;Rui Ma,&nbsp;Xiuli Du,&nbsp;Qiang Han","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-01996-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To enhance the post-earthquake traffic flow capacity of bridge structures, various energy dissipation braces (EDBs) have been developed and applied. However, the effect of various EDBs on the improvement of the post-earthquake functionality of the bridge is difficult to evaluate mainly due to the imperfections in the functional indexes of bridge structures. This study aims to quantify the multi-level residual drift ratios of RC bridge piers based on traffic flow capacity, and to assess the seismic failure of RC bridge piers with different EDBs based on traffic flow capacity. To this end, the traffic flow was categorized into five levels based on the relationship between the traffic flow capacity and the seismic performance of the bridge. The post-earthquake performance states were evaluated on the basis of the residual drift ratio as a performance indicator, and the corresponding residual drift ratio thresholds for bridge structures under different function levels were determined as 0.06%, 0.24%, 0.49%, and 0.85% based on the numerical analysis results. Using traffic flow capacity as the limit states, the failure probabilities of the RC bridge bents with buckling restrained braces (BRBs) and self-centering energy-dissipation braces (SCEBs) were further investigated. The results show that traditional BRBs show better performance with respect to the maximum drift ratio while the SCEBs show better performance with respect to the residual drift ratio. It is indicated that the SCEB is much more effective in improving the repairability and post-earthquake traffic flow capacity of the bridge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"22 11","pages":"5917 - 5949"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-01996-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To enhance the post-earthquake traffic flow capacity of bridge structures, various energy dissipation braces (EDBs) have been developed and applied. However, the effect of various EDBs on the improvement of the post-earthquake functionality of the bridge is difficult to evaluate mainly due to the imperfections in the functional indexes of bridge structures. This study aims to quantify the multi-level residual drift ratios of RC bridge piers based on traffic flow capacity, and to assess the seismic failure of RC bridge piers with different EDBs based on traffic flow capacity. To this end, the traffic flow was categorized into five levels based on the relationship between the traffic flow capacity and the seismic performance of the bridge. The post-earthquake performance states were evaluated on the basis of the residual drift ratio as a performance indicator, and the corresponding residual drift ratio thresholds for bridge structures under different function levels were determined as 0.06%, 0.24%, 0.49%, and 0.85% based on the numerical analysis results. Using traffic flow capacity as the limit states, the failure probabilities of the RC bridge bents with buckling restrained braces (BRBs) and self-centering energy-dissipation braces (SCEBs) were further investigated. The results show that traditional BRBs show better performance with respect to the maximum drift ratio while the SCEBs show better performance with respect to the residual drift ratio. It is indicated that the SCEB is much more effective in improving the repairability and post-earthquake traffic flow capacity of the bridge.

Abstract Image

基于交通流量的钢筋混凝土桥墩多级残余漂移率量化及其在带 EDB 的钢筋混凝土桥墩地震破坏评估中的应用
为了提高桥梁结构的震后通行能力,人们开发并应用了各种消能支架(EDB)。然而,由于桥梁结构功能指标的不完善,各种消能支撑对改善桥梁震后功能的效果难以评估。本研究旨在量化基于交通流容量的 RC 桥墩多级残余漂移率,并基于交通流容量评估采用不同 EDB 的 RC 桥墩的地震破坏。为此,根据交通流量容量与桥梁抗震性能之间的关系,将交通流量分为五个等级。震后性能状态以残余漂移率作为性能指标进行评估,并根据数值分析结果确定了不同功能等级下桥梁结构相应的残余漂移率临界值分别为 0.06%、0.24%、0.49% 和 0.85%。以交通流量为极限状态,进一步研究了带屈曲约束支撑(BRB)和自定中心消能支撑(SCEB)的 RC 桥桁架的破坏概率。结果表明,传统 BRB 在最大漂移率方面表现更好,而 SCEB 在残余漂移率方面表现更好。这表明 SCEB 在提高桥梁的可修复性和震后通行能力方面更为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信