Early Life Exposure to Adverse Childhood Experiences and School Readiness Among Preschoolers with Disruptive Behaviors

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Akira S. Gutierrez, Katherine Zambrana, Bridget Poznanski, Jorge Valdes, Katie C. Hart
{"title":"Early Life Exposure to Adverse Childhood Experiences and School Readiness Among Preschoolers with Disruptive Behaviors","authors":"Akira S. Gutierrez, Katherine Zambrana, Bridget Poznanski, Jorge Valdes, Katie C. Hart","doi":"10.1007/s10826-024-02895-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explored the associations between Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and functioning across several school readiness domains among preschoolers with disruptive behavior problems. The sample included 115 children (M<sub>age</sub>= 5.18, 67.8% male; 32.2% female) from a large, urban, high-poverty community, with predominantly Black families, who were about to enroll in a summer treatment program prior to kindergarten. As part of pre-treatment assessments, caregivers completed interviews and questionnaires about adverse experiences and stressors in their children’s lives. Children’s behavioral, academic, and social functioning were also assessed at this time. We identified exposure to ACEs using multimodal parent reports. A path analysis was conducted between preschoolers’ exposures to ACEs and their school readiness, covarying outcomes with one another to isolate the effect of ACEs. Our findings indicate a dose-effect, such that exposure to a higher number of ACEs is significantly associated with more severe disruptive behaviors, internalizing problems, and global impairment in the child’s functioning. However, there were no significant associations between total number of ACEs and academic or social functioning. Notably, the prevalence of ACEs among this sample of preschoolers living in highly under-resourced communities was strikingly higher than national samples, with 93.9% of parents reporting exposure to at least one ACE by age 5, compared to 19–26% in a nationally samples; moreover, 62.6% experienced 3 or more ACEs, compared to 5.35% in same-aged samples (Briggs-Gowan et al., 2010; Jackson et al., 2021). Our study contributes to the growing literature on the importance of recognizing the heightened risk of early and compounding adversity in school readiness outcomes for young children with special needs. Implications for early intervention timing and the need to consider <i>readiness for preschool</i> are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child and Family Studies","volume":"146 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child and Family Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02895-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the associations between Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and functioning across several school readiness domains among preschoolers with disruptive behavior problems. The sample included 115 children (Mage= 5.18, 67.8% male; 32.2% female) from a large, urban, high-poverty community, with predominantly Black families, who were about to enroll in a summer treatment program prior to kindergarten. As part of pre-treatment assessments, caregivers completed interviews and questionnaires about adverse experiences and stressors in their children’s lives. Children’s behavioral, academic, and social functioning were also assessed at this time. We identified exposure to ACEs using multimodal parent reports. A path analysis was conducted between preschoolers’ exposures to ACEs and their school readiness, covarying outcomes with one another to isolate the effect of ACEs. Our findings indicate a dose-effect, such that exposure to a higher number of ACEs is significantly associated with more severe disruptive behaviors, internalizing problems, and global impairment in the child’s functioning. However, there were no significant associations between total number of ACEs and academic or social functioning. Notably, the prevalence of ACEs among this sample of preschoolers living in highly under-resourced communities was strikingly higher than national samples, with 93.9% of parents reporting exposure to at least one ACE by age 5, compared to 19–26% in a nationally samples; moreover, 62.6% experienced 3 or more ACEs, compared to 5.35% in same-aged samples (Briggs-Gowan et al., 2010; Jackson et al., 2021). Our study contributes to the growing literature on the importance of recognizing the heightened risk of early and compounding adversity in school readiness outcomes for young children with special needs. Implications for early intervention timing and the need to consider readiness for preschool are discussed.

Abstract Image

有破坏性行为的学龄前儿童早期生活中的不良童年经历与入学准备情况
本研究探讨了童年不良经历(ACE)与有破坏性行为问题的学龄前儿童在多个入学准备领域的功能之间的关联。样本包括 115 名儿童(年龄为 5.18 岁,67.8% 为男性;32.2% 为女性),他们来自一个大型城市贫困社区,主要是黑人家庭,即将参加幼儿园前的暑期治疗项目。作为治疗前评估的一部分,照顾者完成了关于孩子生活中的不良经历和压力的访谈和问卷调查。同时还对儿童的行为、学业和社会功能进行了评估。我们通过家长的多模态报告来确定他们是否接触过 ACE。我们对学龄前儿童所接触的 ACE 与他们的入学准备情况进行了路径分析,将结果相互共变,以分离出 ACE 的影响。我们的研究结果表明,暴露于更多的 ACEs 与更严重的破坏性行为、内化问题和儿童功能的全面损害有明显的剂量效应。然而,ACE 的总数与学业或社会功能之间并无明显关联。值得注意的是,生活在资源极度匮乏社区的学龄前儿童的 ACE 发生率明显高于全国样本,93.9% 的家长报告说,他们在 5 岁前至少经历过一次 ACE,而全国样本的这一比例仅为 19-26%;此外,62.6% 的家长经历过 3 次或更多次 ACE,而同龄样本的这一比例仅为 5.35%(Briggs-Gowan 等人,2010 年;Jackson 等人,2021 年)。我们的研究为越来越多的文献做出了贡献,这些文献指出,对于有特殊需要的幼儿来说,认识到早期逆境和复合逆境在入学准备结果中的高风险非常重要。本研究还讨论了早期干预时机的意义以及考虑学前准备的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Family Studies (JCFS) international, peer-reviewed forum for topical issues pertaining to the behavioral health and well-being of children, adolescents, and their families. Interdisciplinary and ecological in approach, the journal focuses on individual, family, and community contexts that influence child, youth, and family well-being and translates research results into practical applications for providers, program implementers, and policymakers. Original papers address applied and translational research, program evaluation, service delivery, and policy matters that affect child, youth, and family well-being. Topic areas include but are not limited to: enhancing child, youth/young adult, parent, caregiver, and/or family functioning; prevention and intervention related to social, emotional, or behavioral functioning in children, youth, and families; cumulative effects of risk and protective factors on behavioral health, development, and well-being; the effects both of exposure to adverse childhood events and assets/protective factors; child abuse and neglect, housing instability and homelessness, and related ecological factors influencing child and family outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信