Finding least-cost net-zero CO2e strategies for the European cement industry using geospatial techno-economic modelling†

Till Strunge, Lukas Küng, Nixon Sunny, Nilay Shah, Phil Renforth and Mijndert Van der Spek
{"title":"Finding least-cost net-zero CO2e strategies for the European cement industry using geospatial techno-economic modelling†","authors":"Till Strunge, Lukas Küng, Nixon Sunny, Nilay Shah, Phil Renforth and Mijndert Van der Spek","doi":"10.1039/D4SU00373J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Cement production is responsible for approximately 7% of anthropogenic CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>-equivalent (CO<small><sub>2e</sub></small>) emissions, while characterised by low margins and the highest carbon intensity of any industry per unit of revenue. Hence, economically viable decarbonisation strategies must be found. The costs of many emission reduction strategies depend on geographical factors, such as plant location and proximity to feedstock or on synergies with other cement producers. The current literature lacks quantification of least-cost decarbonisation strategies of a country or region's total cement sector, while taking stock of these geospatial differences. Here, we quantify which intervention ensembles could lead to least-cost, full decarbonisation of the European cement industry, for multiple European regions. We show that least-cost strategies include the use of calcined clay cements coupled with carbon capture and storage (CCS) from existing cement plants and direct air capture with carbon storage (DACCS) in locations close to CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> storage sites. We find that these strategies could cost €72–€75 per tonne of cement (t<small><sub>cement</sub></small><small><sup>−1</sup></small>, up from €46–€51.5 t<small><sub>cement</sub></small><small><sup>−1</sup></small>), which could be offset by future costs of cement production otherwise amounting to €105–€130 t<small><sub>cement</sub></small><small><sup>−1</sup></small> taking the cost of CO<small><sub>2e</sub></small> emission certificates into account. The analysis shows that for economically viable decarbonisation, collaborative and region-catered approaches become imperative, while supplementary cementitious materials including calcined clays have a key role.</p>","PeriodicalId":74745,"journal":{"name":"RSC sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/su/d4su00373j?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/su/d4su00373j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cement production is responsible for approximately 7% of anthropogenic CO2-equivalent (CO2e) emissions, while characterised by low margins and the highest carbon intensity of any industry per unit of revenue. Hence, economically viable decarbonisation strategies must be found. The costs of many emission reduction strategies depend on geographical factors, such as plant location and proximity to feedstock or on synergies with other cement producers. The current literature lacks quantification of least-cost decarbonisation strategies of a country or region's total cement sector, while taking stock of these geospatial differences. Here, we quantify which intervention ensembles could lead to least-cost, full decarbonisation of the European cement industry, for multiple European regions. We show that least-cost strategies include the use of calcined clay cements coupled with carbon capture and storage (CCS) from existing cement plants and direct air capture with carbon storage (DACCS) in locations close to CO2 storage sites. We find that these strategies could cost €72–€75 per tonne of cement (tcement−1, up from €46–€51.5 tcement−1), which could be offset by future costs of cement production otherwise amounting to €105–€130 tcement−1 taking the cost of CO2e emission certificates into account. The analysis shows that for economically viable decarbonisation, collaborative and region-catered approaches become imperative, while supplementary cementitious materials including calcined clays have a key role.

Abstract Image

利用地理空间技术经济模型为欧洲水泥行业寻找成本最低的二氧化碳净零排放战略
水泥生产约占人为二氧化碳当量(CO2e)排放量的 7%,而水泥生产的利润率很低,单位收入的碳强度在所有行业中最高。为了促进减排,实现二氧化碳净零排放,必须找到针对具体地点的经济上可行的脱碳途径。在此,我们通过地理空间技术经济模型确定了欧洲水泥行业实现二氧化碳净零排放的多种成本效益战略。我们发现,成本最低的途径包括煅烧粘土水泥与碳捕集与封存(CCS)以及直接空气捕集与碳封存(DACCS)。我们发现,这些途径的成本为每吨水泥(tcement-1)72-75欧元,考虑到二氧化碳当量证书的成本,未来水泥生产成本为105-130欧元(tcement-1)。我们在此表明,要实现经济上可行的脱碳,合作和针对特定地区的方法是关键,同时必须承担首次投资的较高成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信