Exploring asymmetric dynamics of R&D spending and firm value nexus: Insights from panel autoregressive distributed lag analysis

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Navjot Kaur, Balwinder Singh
{"title":"Exploring asymmetric dynamics of R&D spending and firm value nexus: Insights from panel autoregressive distributed lag analysis","authors":"Navjot Kaur,&nbsp;Balwinder Singh","doi":"10.1002/mde.4362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present study aims to provide valuable insights into the impact of research and development (R&amp;D) spending on firm value, considering both short-term and long-term dynamics while also considering any potential asymmetries in this relationship. This work is conducted using a sample of 185 listed Indian manufacturing firms over a time span of 18 years, that is, from 2006 to 2023. Both symmetric and asymmetric autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) are employed on a final sample of 3330 firm-year observations to unravel the intricacies of the aforementioned relationship. Based on the empirical findings from the symmetric ARDL model, it is revealed that R&amp;D spending positively impacts the value of firms in the long run while showing no significant effect in the short run. On the contrary, the results from the asymmetric ARDL model present interesting insights. In the short run, positive (negative) changes in R&amp;D spending appear to reduce (increase) the value of firms. However, in the long run, positive (negative) changes tend to increase (reduce) the value of companies. The key differentiator of the study is the identification of the asymmetrical impact of R&amp;D spending on firm value. The paper argues that while R&amp;D spending does influence firm value, the relationship between them is not inherently symmetrical. In particular, the impact of R&amp;D spending changes from being statistically insignificant when using symmetric ARDL estimation to becoming significant when applying asymmetrical estimation methods. The findings remain largely consistent across different subsamples and alternative measurements of variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 1","pages":"100-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims to provide valuable insights into the impact of research and development (R&D) spending on firm value, considering both short-term and long-term dynamics while also considering any potential asymmetries in this relationship. This work is conducted using a sample of 185 listed Indian manufacturing firms over a time span of 18 years, that is, from 2006 to 2023. Both symmetric and asymmetric autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) are employed on a final sample of 3330 firm-year observations to unravel the intricacies of the aforementioned relationship. Based on the empirical findings from the symmetric ARDL model, it is revealed that R&D spending positively impacts the value of firms in the long run while showing no significant effect in the short run. On the contrary, the results from the asymmetric ARDL model present interesting insights. In the short run, positive (negative) changes in R&D spending appear to reduce (increase) the value of firms. However, in the long run, positive (negative) changes tend to increase (reduce) the value of companies. The key differentiator of the study is the identification of the asymmetrical impact of R&D spending on firm value. The paper argues that while R&D spending does influence firm value, the relationship between them is not inherently symmetrical. In particular, the impact of R&D spending changes from being statistically insignificant when using symmetric ARDL estimation to becoming significant when applying asymmetrical estimation methods. The findings remain largely consistent across different subsamples and alternative measurements of variables.

探索研发支出与企业价值关系的非对称动态:面板自回归分布式滞后分析的启示
本研究旨在深入探讨研究与开发(R&D)支出对公司价值的影响,既考虑短期和长期动态,又考虑这种关系中任何潜在的不对称性。这项研究以 185 家印度制造业上市公司为样本,时间跨度为 18 年,即从 2006 年到 2023 年。对称和非对称自回归分布滞后(ARDL)均被用于 3330 个公司年观测数据的最终样本,以揭示上述关系的复杂性。对称自回归分布滞后模型的实证结果表明,研发支出在长期内对企业价值有积极影响,而在短期内没有显著影响。与此相反,非对称 ARDL 模型的结果提出了有趣的见解。在短期内,研发支出的正(负)变化似乎会降低(提高)企业价值。然而,从长期来看,正(负)变化往往会增加(减少)公司的价值。这项研究的关键与众不同之处在于发现了研发支出对公司价值的非对称影响。本文认为,虽然研发支出确实会影响公司价值,但两者之间的关系本质上并不对称。特别是,R&D 支出的影响从使用对称 ARDL 估计时的统计不显著变为使用非对称估计方法时的显著。在不同的子样本和变量的其他测量方法中,研究结果基本保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信