Combination of a Rapid Diagnostic Assay and Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention on Gram-negative Bacteremia

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Julian Ventres, Michelle H Ting, Diane M Parente, Ralph Rogers, Ashlyn M Norris, Gregorio Benitez, Fadi Shehadeh, April M Bobenchik, Eleftherios Mylonakis, Kimberle C Chapin, Cheston B Cunha
{"title":"Combination of a Rapid Diagnostic Assay and Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention on Gram-negative Bacteremia","authors":"Julian Ventres, Michelle H Ting, Diane M Parente, Ralph Rogers, Ashlyn M Norris, Gregorio Benitez, Fadi Shehadeh, April M Bobenchik, Eleftherios Mylonakis, Kimberle C Chapin, Cheston B Cunha","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Traditional blood cultures for gram-negative bacteremia can take up to 72 hours or more to return results, prolonging the duration of empiric broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. The Accelerate Pheno® system provides rapid identification and susceptibilities for blood cultures in gram-negative bacteremia. Current data on its clinical utility is mixed overall and requires further research. Methods A multi-center, retrospective quasi-experimental study was conducted comparing the Accelerate Pheno® rapid diagnostic system with antimicrobial stewardship intervention and traditional blood cultures alone. Results A total of 264 patients with blood cultures with gram-negative bacteria growth were included in the final analysis (102 pre-intervention, 162 post-intervention). The antimicrobial stewardship team made 364 recommendations in 152/162 (93.8%) patients in the post-group. Duration of intravenous therapy was shorter (p<0.001) for the post-intervention group (median 4.0 days) compared to the pre-intervention group (median 7.5 days). Hospital length of stay was also shorter (p<0.001) for the post-intervention group (median 5.1 days) compared to the pre-intervention group (median 7.0 days). Readmission rates within 30 days were reduced (p=0.042) post-intervention (13.0%) compared to pre-intervention (22.6%). In the post-intervention group, a larger proportion of patients were transitioned to oral therapy at any point (126/162, 77.8%) compared to pre-intervention (62/102, 60.8%) (p<0.001). Conclusions These results suggest that the Accelerate Pheno® with active review and intervention by a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team is a useful tool in improving both patient-centric and antimicrobial stewardship outcomes.","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Traditional blood cultures for gram-negative bacteremia can take up to 72 hours or more to return results, prolonging the duration of empiric broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. The Accelerate Pheno® system provides rapid identification and susceptibilities for blood cultures in gram-negative bacteremia. Current data on its clinical utility is mixed overall and requires further research. Methods A multi-center, retrospective quasi-experimental study was conducted comparing the Accelerate Pheno® rapid diagnostic system with antimicrobial stewardship intervention and traditional blood cultures alone. Results A total of 264 patients with blood cultures with gram-negative bacteria growth were included in the final analysis (102 pre-intervention, 162 post-intervention). The antimicrobial stewardship team made 364 recommendations in 152/162 (93.8%) patients in the post-group. Duration of intravenous therapy was shorter (p<0.001) for the post-intervention group (median 4.0 days) compared to the pre-intervention group (median 7.5 days). Hospital length of stay was also shorter (p<0.001) for the post-intervention group (median 5.1 days) compared to the pre-intervention group (median 7.0 days). Readmission rates within 30 days were reduced (p=0.042) post-intervention (13.0%) compared to pre-intervention (22.6%). In the post-intervention group, a larger proportion of patients were transitioned to oral therapy at any point (126/162, 77.8%) compared to pre-intervention (62/102, 60.8%) (p<0.001). Conclusions These results suggest that the Accelerate Pheno® with active review and intervention by a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team is a useful tool in improving both patient-centric and antimicrobial stewardship outcomes.
革兰氏阴性菌血症的快速诊断分析与抗菌药物管理干预相结合
背景 传统的革兰氏阴性菌血症血液培养需要 72 小时或更长时间才能得出结果,从而延长了静脉注射广谱抗生素的时间。Accelerate Pheno® 系统可对革兰氏阴性菌血症的血液培养物进行快速鉴定和药敏试验。目前有关该系统临床实用性的数据不一,需要进一步研究。方法 进行了一项多中心、回顾性准实验研究,比较了加速 Pheno® 快速诊断系统与抗菌药物管理干预和传统的单纯血培养。结果 共有 264 名血液培养结果显示有革兰氏阴性菌生长的患者被纳入最终分析(干预前 102 人,干预后 162 人)。抗菌药物管理团队对干预后组的 152/162 名患者(93.8%)提出了 364 项建议。与干预前(中位数为 7.5 天)相比,干预后组(中位数为 4.0 天)的静脉治疗时间更短(p<0.001)。干预后组的住院时间(中位数为 5.1 天)也比干预前组(中位数为 7.0 天)短(p<0.001)。干预后(13.0%)与干预前(22.6%)相比,30 天内再入院率有所降低(p=0.042)。与干预前(62/102,60.8%)相比,干预后组中有更大比例的患者在任何时候都转为口服治疗(126/162,77.8%)(p<0.001)。结论 这些结果表明,在多学科抗菌药物管理团队的积极审查和干预下,加速 Pheno® 是改善以患者为中心和抗菌药物管理结果的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信