Short Versus Long Antibiotic Duration in Streptococcus pneumoniae Bacteremia

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Matthew Crotty, Hadley Devall, Natalie Cook, Francis Fischer, Julie Alexander, Leigh Hunter, Edward Dominguez
{"title":"Short Versus Long Antibiotic Duration in Streptococcus pneumoniae Bacteremia","authors":"Matthew Crotty, Hadley Devall, Natalie Cook, Francis Fischer, Julie Alexander, Leigh Hunter, Edward Dominguez","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Streptococcus pneumoniae is a common pathogen associated with bloodstream infections (BSI), respiratory infections, peritonitis, infective endocarditis, and meningitis. Literature assessing duration of antibiotic therapy for a S. pneumoniae bacteremia secondary to common infection is scarce, leading to variability in practice. Therefore, this study evaluated the effectiveness of short (5-10 days) versus long (11-16 days) antibiotic durations for S. pneumoniae bacteremia. Methods This retrospective, single-center cohort study assessed hospitalized patients with S. pneumoniae positive blood cultures, who received active antibiotics within 48 hours of first positive blood culture collection and achieved clinical stability by day 10 of the first positive blood culture collection. Exclusion criteria included treatment duration <5 or >16 days, death before completion of 10 days of therapy, polymicrobial BSI, and invasive infection. Rates of clinical failure (composite of 30-day hospital readmission, bacteremia recurrence, and mortality) were compared between the groups. Results A total of 162 patients were included with 51 patients in the short and 111 patients in the long duration group. Pneumonia was the suspected source of bacteremia in 90.1% of patients. Rates of clinical failure were not significantly different between the two groups. Patients received a median antibiotic course of 7 days in the short group compared to 14 days in the long group, however, there was no significant difference observed in the median hospital length of stay (LOS), median ICU LOS, or rate of Clostridioides difficile infection. Conclusion Shorter antibiotic courses may be appropriate in patients with S. pneumoniae bacteremia secondary to community-acquired pneumonia.","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Streptococcus pneumoniae is a common pathogen associated with bloodstream infections (BSI), respiratory infections, peritonitis, infective endocarditis, and meningitis. Literature assessing duration of antibiotic therapy for a S. pneumoniae bacteremia secondary to common infection is scarce, leading to variability in practice. Therefore, this study evaluated the effectiveness of short (5-10 days) versus long (11-16 days) antibiotic durations for S. pneumoniae bacteremia. Methods This retrospective, single-center cohort study assessed hospitalized patients with S. pneumoniae positive blood cultures, who received active antibiotics within 48 hours of first positive blood culture collection and achieved clinical stability by day 10 of the first positive blood culture collection. Exclusion criteria included treatment duration <5 or >16 days, death before completion of 10 days of therapy, polymicrobial BSI, and invasive infection. Rates of clinical failure (composite of 30-day hospital readmission, bacteremia recurrence, and mortality) were compared between the groups. Results A total of 162 patients were included with 51 patients in the short and 111 patients in the long duration group. Pneumonia was the suspected source of bacteremia in 90.1% of patients. Rates of clinical failure were not significantly different between the two groups. Patients received a median antibiotic course of 7 days in the short group compared to 14 days in the long group, however, there was no significant difference observed in the median hospital length of stay (LOS), median ICU LOS, or rate of Clostridioides difficile infection. Conclusion Shorter antibiotic courses may be appropriate in patients with S. pneumoniae bacteremia secondary to community-acquired pneumonia.
肺炎链球菌菌血症中抗生素使用时间长短的比较
背景 肺炎链球菌是一种常见的病原体,与血流感染(BSI)、呼吸道感染、腹膜炎、感染性心内膜炎和脑膜炎有关。评估继发于普通感染的肺炎双球菌菌血症的抗生素治疗持续时间的文献很少,导致实践中的差异。因此,本研究评估了短期(5-10 天)与长期(11-16 天)抗生素治疗肺炎双球菌菌血症的效果。方法 该回顾性单中心队列研究评估了肺炎双球菌血培养阳性的住院患者,这些患者在首次血培养阳性后 48 小时内接受了积极的抗生素治疗,并在首次血培养阳性后第 10 天达到临床稳定。排除标准包括治疗持续时间<5或>16天、治疗10天前死亡、多菌性BSI和侵袭性感染。比较了两组患者的临床失败率(30 天再入院、菌血症复发和死亡率的综合)。结果 共纳入 162 名患者,其中短病程组 51 人,长病程组 111 人。90.1%的患者怀疑菌血症来源于肺炎。两组患者的临床失败率无明显差异。短疗程组患者的中位抗生素疗程为 7 天,而长疗程组为 14 天,但在中位住院时间(LOS)、中位重症监护室住院时间或艰难梭菌感染率方面均无明显差异。结论 对于继发于社区获得性肺炎的肺炎双球菌菌血症患者,缩短抗生素疗程可能是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信