Does adding legumes to tall fescue pastures before stockpiling improve productivity and animal performance?

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Michael D. Corbin, Renata L. G. Nave, Harley D. Naumann, Gary E. Bates, Christopher Boyer, Otávio G. de Almeida
{"title":"Does adding legumes to tall fescue pastures before stockpiling improve productivity and animal performance?","authors":"Michael D. Corbin,&nbsp;Renata L. G. Nave,&nbsp;Harley D. Naumann,&nbsp;Gary E. Bates,&nbsp;Christopher Boyer,&nbsp;Otávio G. de Almeida","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rising prices of N fertilizer led to exploring cost-saving efforts, such as intercropping cool- or warm-season legumes serving as alternative sources of N for managing fall-stockpiled tall fescue [<i>Schedonorus arundinaceus</i> (Schreb.) Dumort.; TF]. We aimed to evaluate red clover (<i>Trifolium pratense</i> L.; RC) and sunn hemp (<i>Crotalaria juncea</i> L.; SH) mixed with TF as alternative sources of N for stockpiling TF to increase productivity and animal performance. The experiment was conducted in Crossville, TN, in 2020 and 2021 and consisted of TF pastures mixed with RC (TRC) or SH (TSH), and TF fertilized with urea (TU). The experiment was divided into two periods: the pre-grazing period (stockpiling) (April–October) and the grazing period (October–December). After the stockpiling period, Black Angus beef (<i>Bos taurus</i>) steers were used for the grazing period. The study evaluated the botanical composition, herbage mass (HM), nutritive value, steer average daily gain (ADG), and net returns (NR). The TRC pastures had a greater proportion of legumes compared to TSH plots in May, October, November, and December of both years. There were no differences among treatments for the total HM and nutritive value in 2020; however, in 2021, TU had greater HM at the beginning of the grazing period and greater average crude protein values compared to the other treatments. In both years, there were no differences among treatments for ADG or NR. Therefore, producers can make the same profit considering the beef steer price and the cost of conventional and alternative N sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 6","pages":"3081-3096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21676","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rising prices of N fertilizer led to exploring cost-saving efforts, such as intercropping cool- or warm-season legumes serving as alternative sources of N for managing fall-stockpiled tall fescue [Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort.; TF]. We aimed to evaluate red clover (Trifolium pratense L.; RC) and sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.; SH) mixed with TF as alternative sources of N for stockpiling TF to increase productivity and animal performance. The experiment was conducted in Crossville, TN, in 2020 and 2021 and consisted of TF pastures mixed with RC (TRC) or SH (TSH), and TF fertilized with urea (TU). The experiment was divided into two periods: the pre-grazing period (stockpiling) (April–October) and the grazing period (October–December). After the stockpiling period, Black Angus beef (Bos taurus) steers were used for the grazing period. The study evaluated the botanical composition, herbage mass (HM), nutritive value, steer average daily gain (ADG), and net returns (NR). The TRC pastures had a greater proportion of legumes compared to TSH plots in May, October, November, and December of both years. There were no differences among treatments for the total HM and nutritive value in 2020; however, in 2021, TU had greater HM at the beginning of the grazing period and greater average crude protein values compared to the other treatments. In both years, there were no differences among treatments for ADG or NR. Therefore, producers can make the same profit considering the beef steer price and the cost of conventional and alternative N sources.

在高羊茅牧草堆放前添加豆科植物是否能提高生产率和动物表现?
氮肥价格上涨导致人们开始探索节约成本的方法,例如间作冷季或暖季型豆科植物,作为管理秋季堆放的高羊茅[Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort.; TF]的氮替代来源。我们旨在评估红三叶(Trifolium pratense L.;RC)和苘麻(Crotalaria juncea L.;SH)与高羊茅混合后作为氮的替代来源,用于储存高羊茅,以提高生产率和动物表现。实验于 2020 年和 2021 年在田纳西州克罗斯维尔市进行,包括与 RC(TRC)或 SH(TSH)混合的 TF 牧场,以及施肥尿素(TU)的 TF。实验分为两个阶段:放牧前(堆放期)(4 月至 10 月)和放牧期(10 月至 12 月)。储备期结束后,使用黑安格斯肉牛(Bos taurus)进行放牧。研究评估了植物成分、草料质量 (HM)、营养价值、肉牛平均日增重 (ADG) 和净收益 (NR)。在这两年的 5 月、10 月、11 月和 12 月,与 TSH 地块相比,TRC 草场的豆科植物比例更高。在 2020 年,各处理的总 HM 和营养价值没有差异;但在 2021 年,与其他处理相比,TU 在放牧期开始时的 HM 更大,平均粗蛋白值更高。在这两年中,各处理的 ADG 和 NR 没有差异。因此,考虑到肉牛价格以及传统氮源和替代氮源的成本,生产者可以获得相同的利润。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信