Impact of crop residue removal on crop production, feedstock quality, and theoretical ethanol production in the Mid-Atlantic United States

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Martin L. Battaglia, Sirwan Babaei, Amir Sadeghpour, Wade E. Thomason, Subhan Danish, Mahmoud Seleiman, Ekrem Ozlu, Maythem AL-Amery, John H. Fike, Andre A. Diatta
{"title":"Impact of crop residue removal on crop production, feedstock quality, and theoretical ethanol production in the Mid-Atlantic United States","authors":"Martin L. Battaglia,&nbsp;Sirwan Babaei,&nbsp;Amir Sadeghpour,&nbsp;Wade E. Thomason,&nbsp;Subhan Danish,&nbsp;Mahmoud Seleiman,&nbsp;Ekrem Ozlu,&nbsp;Maythem AL-Amery,&nbsp;John H. Fike,&nbsp;Andre A. Diatta","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cellulosic biomass-to-bioenergy systems provide fuel, reduce emissions, and offer economic benefits. Corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) and wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) residues could be used as feedstocks for biofuel production. However, the impact of residue removal on crop productivity in the Mid-Atlantic region has not been thoroughly assessed. A trial was conducted to assess crop yield and quality response to different biomass retention rates in grain cropping systems during 2015–2017. Various combinations of corn stover (0–10 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and wheat straw (0–3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) were applied in a corn–wheat/soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] rotation in New Kent, VA. In Blacksburg, VA, corn stover (0–20 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) was applied in the continuous corn system. Residues were applied after grain harvest over two production cycles for each system. Residue retention showed no significant impact on grain or crop residue yields or nutrient uptake in either system. Treatment minimally impacted feedstock quality, except wheat straw's sulfur (S) concentration, optimized at around 70% retention in New Kent. Theoretical ethanol potential (TEP) and yield remained unaffected by total residue rates in New Kent. In Blacksburg, over 2 years, a minimum TEP for corn stover corresponded to a retention rate of approximately 30%. A retention rate of more than 30% increased TEP, likely due to improved feedstock quality. Nutrient replacement costs for primary macronutrients and S uptake ranged from $18.3 to $36.9 ha<sup>−1</sup> for corn stover and $6.1 to $11.8 ha<sup>−1</sup> for wheat straw. Residue harvest or addition did not harm short-term biomass yield in Virginia's grain-based cropping systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 6","pages":"3033-3052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21659","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cellulosic biomass-to-bioenergy systems provide fuel, reduce emissions, and offer economic benefits. Corn (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) residues could be used as feedstocks for biofuel production. However, the impact of residue removal on crop productivity in the Mid-Atlantic region has not been thoroughly assessed. A trial was conducted to assess crop yield and quality response to different biomass retention rates in grain cropping systems during 2015–2017. Various combinations of corn stover (0–10 Mg ha−1) and wheat straw (0–3 Mg ha−1) were applied in a corn–wheat/soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation in New Kent, VA. In Blacksburg, VA, corn stover (0–20 Mg ha−1) was applied in the continuous corn system. Residues were applied after grain harvest over two production cycles for each system. Residue retention showed no significant impact on grain or crop residue yields or nutrient uptake in either system. Treatment minimally impacted feedstock quality, except wheat straw's sulfur (S) concentration, optimized at around 70% retention in New Kent. Theoretical ethanol potential (TEP) and yield remained unaffected by total residue rates in New Kent. In Blacksburg, over 2 years, a minimum TEP for corn stover corresponded to a retention rate of approximately 30%. A retention rate of more than 30% increased TEP, likely due to improved feedstock quality. Nutrient replacement costs for primary macronutrients and S uptake ranged from $18.3 to $36.9 ha−1 for corn stover and $6.1 to $11.8 ha−1 for wheat straw. Residue harvest or addition did not harm short-term biomass yield in Virginia's grain-based cropping systems.

清除作物残茬对美国大西洋中部地区作物产量、原料质量和理论乙醇产量的影响
纤维素生物质转化生物能源系统可提供燃料、减少排放并带来经济效益。玉米(Zea mays L.)和小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)残留物可用作生物燃料生产的原料。然而,在大西洋中部地区,清除残留物对作物产量的影响尚未得到全面评估。在 2015-2017 年期间进行了一项试验,以评估谷物种植系统中不同生物质保留率对作物产量和品质的影响。在弗吉尼亚州新肯特的玉米-小麦-大豆(Glycine max (L.) Merr.)轮作中,施用了玉米秸秆(0-10 兆克/公顷-1)和小麦秸秆(0-3 兆克/公顷-1)的各种组合。在弗吉尼亚州的布莱克斯堡,玉米秸秆(0-20 兆克/公顷-1)被施用于玉米连作系统。在每个系统的两个生产周期中,谷物收获后施用残留物。残留物的保留对谷物或作物残留物产量或养分吸收均无明显影响。除小麦秸秆的硫(S)浓度外,处理对原料质量的影响微乎其微,新肯特郡的处理在 70% 左右的保留率时达到最佳。在新肯特,理论乙醇潜力(TEP)和产量仍然不受总残留率的影响。在布莱克斯堡,经过 2 年时间,玉米秸秆的最低 TEP 与约 30% 的保留率相对应。30% 以上的保留率提高了总秸秆利用率,这可能是由于原料质量的提高。玉米秸秆和小麦秸秆的主要常量营养元素和 S 吸收的养分替代成本分别为 18.3 美元至 36.9 美元/公顷和 6.1 美元至 11.8 美元/公顷。在弗吉尼亚州以谷物为基础的种植系统中,收割或添加残留物不会损害短期生物量产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信