Protocol of a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PLACES intervention: a supported employment intervention aimed at enhancing work participation of unemployed and/or work-disabled cancer survivors

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
F. van Ommen, S. F. A. Duijts, P. Coenen, S. O. Dalton, A. Kliffen, R. van Hummel, A. G. E. M. de Boer, M. A. Greidanus
{"title":"Protocol of a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PLACES intervention: a supported employment intervention aimed at enhancing work participation of unemployed and/or work-disabled cancer survivors","authors":"F. van Ommen, S. F. A. Duijts, P. Coenen, S. O. Dalton, A. Kliffen, R. van Hummel, A. G. E. M. de Boer, M. A. Greidanus","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08441-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximately onethird of cancer survivors encounter challenges reintegrating into the workforce, often experiencing involuntary unemployment and/or partial or full work disability following diagnosis and treatment. Returning to paid employment presents evident challenges due to uncertainties regarding work ability, perceived employer discrimination, and a lack of support, thereby risking social exclusion. However, interventions addressing return to paid employment among unemployed and/or work-disabled cancer survivors are scarce. Here, we describe the protocol of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), including a process and economic evaluation, evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PLACES (unemPLoyed cAnCEr survivors Support) intervention aimed at supporting unemployed and/or work-disabled cancer survivors returning to paid employment. A two-armed RCT with a 12-month follow-up period will be conducted. Eligible participants: (1) are of working age (18–65 years), (2) are diagnosed with cancer between 6 months and 10 years ago, (3) are unemployed and/or partially or fully work-disabled, (4) have completed cancer treatment, and (5) are seeking paid employment and are motivated to initiate work immediately. Participants will primarily be identified through the Dutch Social Security Agency and the Netherlands Cancer Registry and recruited via healthcare professionals. Participants randomly allocated to the intervention group (n = 82) will receive the PLACES intervention: a tailored supported employment intervention based on the principles of Individual Placement and Support (IPS). This includes support in seeking, returning to, and maintaining paid employment. Participants allocated to the control group (n = 82) will receive care as usual. All participants will be asked to complete questionnaires, at baseline (T0), and after 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 (T3) months of follow-up. The primary outcome is paid employment [yes/no]. Secondary outcomes are time until paid employment, change in working hours, work ability, quality of (working) life, and self-efficacy regarding return to work. Additionally, process and economic evaluations will be conducted. We hypothesize that the PLACES intervention will be effective in obtaining paid employment, enhancing work ability, and improving quality of life. In addition, we expect the intervention to be cost-effective. If proven effective and cost-effective, actions should be taken to implement the intervention in usual care. NCT06028048.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08441-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately onethird of cancer survivors encounter challenges reintegrating into the workforce, often experiencing involuntary unemployment and/or partial or full work disability following diagnosis and treatment. Returning to paid employment presents evident challenges due to uncertainties regarding work ability, perceived employer discrimination, and a lack of support, thereby risking social exclusion. However, interventions addressing return to paid employment among unemployed and/or work-disabled cancer survivors are scarce. Here, we describe the protocol of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), including a process and economic evaluation, evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PLACES (unemPLoyed cAnCEr survivors Support) intervention aimed at supporting unemployed and/or work-disabled cancer survivors returning to paid employment. A two-armed RCT with a 12-month follow-up period will be conducted. Eligible participants: (1) are of working age (18–65 years), (2) are diagnosed with cancer between 6 months and 10 years ago, (3) are unemployed and/or partially or fully work-disabled, (4) have completed cancer treatment, and (5) are seeking paid employment and are motivated to initiate work immediately. Participants will primarily be identified through the Dutch Social Security Agency and the Netherlands Cancer Registry and recruited via healthcare professionals. Participants randomly allocated to the intervention group (n = 82) will receive the PLACES intervention: a tailored supported employment intervention based on the principles of Individual Placement and Support (IPS). This includes support in seeking, returning to, and maintaining paid employment. Participants allocated to the control group (n = 82) will receive care as usual. All participants will be asked to complete questionnaires, at baseline (T0), and after 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 (T3) months of follow-up. The primary outcome is paid employment [yes/no]. Secondary outcomes are time until paid employment, change in working hours, work ability, quality of (working) life, and self-efficacy regarding return to work. Additionally, process and economic evaluations will be conducted. We hypothesize that the PLACES intervention will be effective in obtaining paid employment, enhancing work ability, and improving quality of life. In addition, we expect the intervention to be cost-effective. If proven effective and cost-effective, actions should be taken to implement the intervention in usual care. NCT06028048.
PLACES 干预措施的有效性和成本效益随机对照试验方案:旨在提高失业和/或有工作障碍的癌症幸存者参与工作的辅助就业干预措施
约有三分之一的癌症幸存者在重新就业时遇到困难,他们在诊断和治疗后往往非自愿失业和/或部分或全部丧失工作能力。由于工作能力不确定、认为雇主歧视和缺乏支持,重返有偿就业面临着明显的挑战,从而有可能被社会排斥。然而,针对失业和/或丧失工作能力的癌症幸存者重返有偿就业的干预措施却很少。在此,我们介绍了一项随机对照试验(RCT)的方案,其中包括一项过程和经济评估,以评估 PLACES(未就业癌症幸存者支持)干预措施的有效性和成本效益,该干预措施旨在支持失业和/或有工作障碍的癌症幸存者重返有偿就业。将进行一项为期 12 个月的双臂 RCT 随访。符合条件的参与者:(1) 处于工作年龄(18-65 岁);(2) 6 个月至 10 年前被诊断出患有癌症;(3) 失业和/或部分或完全丧失工作能力;(4) 已完成癌症治疗;(5) 正在寻找有偿工作,并有立即开始工作的动机。参与者主要通过荷兰社会保障局和荷兰癌症登记处确定,并通过医疗保健专业人员招募。随机分配到干预组的参与者(n = 82)将接受 PLACES 干预方案:这是一种基于个人安置和支持(IPS)原则的定制辅助就业干预方案。这包括在寻找、重返和保持有偿就业方面提供支持。对照组参与者(n = 82)将接受常规护理。所有参与者都将被要求在基线(T0)以及 3 个月(T1)、6 个月(T2)和 12 个月(T3)的随访后填写调查问卷。主要结果是有偿就业[是/否]。次要结果是有偿就业前的时间、工作时间的变化、工作能力、(工作)生活质量以及重返工作岗位的自我效能。此外,还将进行过程和经济评估。我们的假设是,PLACES 干预措施将有效地获得有偿就业、提高工作能力和改善生活质量。此外,我们还希望干预措施具有成本效益。如果证明有效且具有成本效益,则应采取行动在常规护理中实施该干预措施。NCT06028048。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信