Complex Considerations for Critical Qualitative Childhood Studies: A Perspective From Aotearoa (New Zealand)

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES
Jenny Ritchie
{"title":"Complex Considerations for Critical Qualitative Childhood Studies: A Perspective From Aotearoa (New Zealand)","authors":"Jenny Ritchie","doi":"10.1177/15327086241271947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the complexities of the historical and current context for critical qualitative childhood studies in Aotearoa (New Zealand), a country with a two-century history of colonization by Britain of the Indigenous people, the Māori. This was despite the undertakings of the British contained within a treaty, Te Tiriti o Waitangi to uphold Māori authority over their lands, resources, and things of value, as equal citizens to the British settlers. Māori children were traditionally deeply respected and their contributions to collective decision-making valued. In blatant disregard of these treaty obligations, Māori have been severely impacted by warfare, introduced diseases, and dispossession of lands, language, and identity. There remains within current educational practice a long-standing historical amnesia and wilful ignorance of the intergenerational trauma that has resulted. This extends to the pedagogical and research implications for working in this context of colonization. This piece therefore considers how those who work in tertiary settings, particularly critical childhood studies scholars, might challenge the ongoing hegemonies of White privilege and complacency to create new ethical imaginaries in our teaching and scholarship, research methodology courses, and ethical review processes, beyond token mention of Māori concerns.","PeriodicalId":46996,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086241271947","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers the complexities of the historical and current context for critical qualitative childhood studies in Aotearoa (New Zealand), a country with a two-century history of colonization by Britain of the Indigenous people, the Māori. This was despite the undertakings of the British contained within a treaty, Te Tiriti o Waitangi to uphold Māori authority over their lands, resources, and things of value, as equal citizens to the British settlers. Māori children were traditionally deeply respected and their contributions to collective decision-making valued. In blatant disregard of these treaty obligations, Māori have been severely impacted by warfare, introduced diseases, and dispossession of lands, language, and identity. There remains within current educational practice a long-standing historical amnesia and wilful ignorance of the intergenerational trauma that has resulted. This extends to the pedagogical and research implications for working in this context of colonization. This piece therefore considers how those who work in tertiary settings, particularly critical childhood studies scholars, might challenge the ongoing hegemonies of White privilege and complacency to create new ethical imaginaries in our teaching and scholarship, research methodology courses, and ethical review processes, beyond token mention of Māori concerns.
儿童定性批判研究的复杂考量:来自奥特亚罗瓦(新西兰)的视角
本文探讨了奥特亚罗瓦(新西兰)儿童定性批判研究的历史和现状的复杂性,英国曾对这个国家的土著居民毛利人进行了长达两个世纪的殖民统治。尽管英国人在《怀唐伊条约》(Te Tiriti o Waitangi)中承诺维护毛利人对其土地、资源和有价值物品的权力,将其视为与英国殖民者平等的公民。毛利儿童历来深受尊重,他们对集体决策的贡献也受到重视。毛利人公然无视这些条约义务,受到战争、传入的疾病以及土地、语言和身份被剥夺的严重影响。在当前的教育实践中,仍然存在着一种长期的历史健忘症,对由此造成的世代相传的创伤故意视而不见。这也影响了在殖民化背景下开展工作的教学和研究。因此,这篇文章探讨了那些在高等院校工作的人,尤其是批判性儿童研究学者,如何挑战当前的白人特权霸权和自满情绪,在我们的教学和学术研究、研究方法论课程和伦理审查过程中创造新的伦理想象,而不是象征性地提及毛利人的关切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The mandate for this interdisciplinary, international journal is to move methods talk in cultural studies to the forefront, into the regions of moral, ethical and political discourse. The commitment to imagine a more democratic society has been sa guiding feature of cultural studies from the very beginnnig. Contributors to this journal understand that the discourses of a critical, moral methodology are basic to any effort to re-engage the promise of the social sciences and the humanities for democracy in the 21st Century. We seek works that connect critical emanicipatory theories to new forms of social justice and democratic practice are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信