Genomic analysis of Enterococcus faecium from non-clinical settings: antimicrobial resistance, virulence, and clonal population in livestock and the urban environment

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Jéssica Lopes, Hermínia de Lencastre, Teresa Conceição
{"title":"Genomic analysis of Enterococcus faecium from non-clinical settings: antimicrobial resistance, virulence, and clonal population in livestock and the urban environment","authors":"Jéssica Lopes, Hermínia de Lencastre, Teresa Conceição","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2024.1466990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionEnterococci are commensals of the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals that evolved into opportunistic pathogens with high antimicrobial resistance and virulence. Multidrug-resistant <jats:italic>Enterococcus</jats:italic> is a major cause of hospital-acquired infections worldwide. For this reason, the characterization of non-clinical reservoirs of Enterococci and their epidemiological link to resistant hospital isolates is crucial for controlling their spread.MethodsA total of 295 samples collected from livestock (pigs and cows, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 135) and environment (public buses, passengers hands, and urban environments, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 160) were screened for <jats:italic>Enterococcus</jats:italic> spp. <jats:italic>E. faecium</jats:italic> antimicrobial resistance profiles, virulence potential, and clonal population were further characterized.ResultsEnterococci were detected in 90.5% (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 267) of the samples, with a higher prevalence in livestock (100%) than the environment (82.5%, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.0001), but none of the isolates exhibited vancomycin resistance. <jats:italic>E. faecalis</jats:italic> was the most prevalent species (51.7%), predominantly found in livestock (62.2%), while <jats:italic>E. faecium</jats:italic> was more common in the environment. Of the 59 <jats:italic>E. faecium</jats:italic> isolates, 78% showed resistance to ≥3 antibiotic classes and contained associated resistance genes, namely tetracyclines (<jats:italic>tetM</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>tetL</jats:italic>), beta-lactams (mutations in <jats:italic>pbp5</jats:italic>), and high-level resistance to aminoglycosides (<jats:italic>ant(6)-Ia</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>aac(6′)-aph(2″)</jats:italic>). A wide array of virulence factors was detected among <jats:italic>E. faecium</jats:italic>, associated with adherence, biofilm formation, and adaptation to host response, while hospital-associated virulence markers, such as IS16, were less frequent, probably due to the non-clinical nature of the isolates. Clonal population analysis revealed a diverse <jats:italic>E. faecium</jats:italic> population. Although no direct epidemiological link could be traced between our isolates and specific clinical isolates, infection-associated genetic backgrounds were identified in non-clinical isolates: one isolate from pigs belonged to CC17 (ST32), while four isolates belonged to CC94, including one recovered from pigs (ST296), one from cows (ST2206), one from the urban environment (ST1205), and other from buses (ST800).DiscussionThis study underscores a high prevalence of clinically relevant <jats:italic>Enterococcus</jats:italic> species among healthy livestock and the environment. Despite the absence of vancomycin resistance and limited hospital infection-associated clonal lineages, the presence of <jats:italic>E. faecium</jats:italic> with significant virulence potential and resistance to critical antibiotics in human and veterinary medicine highlights the need for continuing surveillance of non-clinical reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":12466,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1466990","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionEnterococci are commensals of the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals that evolved into opportunistic pathogens with high antimicrobial resistance and virulence. Multidrug-resistant Enterococcus is a major cause of hospital-acquired infections worldwide. For this reason, the characterization of non-clinical reservoirs of Enterococci and their epidemiological link to resistant hospital isolates is crucial for controlling their spread.MethodsA total of 295 samples collected from livestock (pigs and cows, n = 135) and environment (public buses, passengers hands, and urban environments, n = 160) were screened for Enterococcus spp. E. faecium antimicrobial resistance profiles, virulence potential, and clonal population were further characterized.ResultsEnterococci were detected in 90.5% (n = 267) of the samples, with a higher prevalence in livestock (100%) than the environment (82.5%, p &lt; 0.0001), but none of the isolates exhibited vancomycin resistance. E. faecalis was the most prevalent species (51.7%), predominantly found in livestock (62.2%), while E. faecium was more common in the environment. Of the 59 E. faecium isolates, 78% showed resistance to ≥3 antibiotic classes and contained associated resistance genes, namely tetracyclines (tetM and tetL), beta-lactams (mutations in pbp5), and high-level resistance to aminoglycosides (ant(6)-Ia and aac(6′)-aph(2″)). A wide array of virulence factors was detected among E. faecium, associated with adherence, biofilm formation, and adaptation to host response, while hospital-associated virulence markers, such as IS16, were less frequent, probably due to the non-clinical nature of the isolates. Clonal population analysis revealed a diverse E. faecium population. Although no direct epidemiological link could be traced between our isolates and specific clinical isolates, infection-associated genetic backgrounds were identified in non-clinical isolates: one isolate from pigs belonged to CC17 (ST32), while four isolates belonged to CC94, including one recovered from pigs (ST296), one from cows (ST2206), one from the urban environment (ST1205), and other from buses (ST800).DiscussionThis study underscores a high prevalence of clinically relevant Enterococcus species among healthy livestock and the environment. Despite the absence of vancomycin resistance and limited hospital infection-associated clonal lineages, the presence of E. faecium with significant virulence potential and resistance to critical antibiotics in human and veterinary medicine highlights the need for continuing surveillance of non-clinical reservoirs.
非临床环境中的粪肠球菌基因组分析:牲畜和城市环境中的抗菌药耐药性、毒力和克隆种群
导言肠球菌是人类和动物胃肠道中的共生菌,后来进化成机会性病原体,具有很强的抗菌性和毒力。耐多药肠道球菌是全球医院感染的主要原因。因此,确定肠球菌非临床储库的特征及其与耐药医院分离物的流行病学联系对于控制其传播至关重要。结果 在 90.5%(n = 267)的样本中检测到了肠球菌,其中家畜(100%)的感染率高于环境(82.5%,p&lt; 0.0001),但没有一个分离株表现出万古霉素耐药性。粪肠球菌是最常见的菌种(51.7%),主要存在于家畜中(62.2%),而粪肠球菌在环境中更为常见。在 59 个粪肠球菌分离物中,78% 显示出对≥3 类抗生素的耐药性,并含有相关的耐药基因,即四环素类(tetM 和 tetL)、β-内酰胺类(pbp5 突变)以及对氨基糖苷类(ant(6)-Ia 和 aac(6′)-aph(2″) )的高度耐药性。在粪肠球菌中检测到了与粘附、生物膜形成和适应宿主反应相关的多种毒力因子,而医院相关的毒力标记(如 IS16)则较少出现,这可能是由于分离物的非临床性质。克隆种群分析表明,粪肠球菌种群具有多样性。虽然我们的分离物与特定的临床分离物之间没有直接的流行病学联系,但在非临床分离物中发现了与感染相关的遗传背景:一个来自猪的分离物属于 CC17(ST32),而四个分离物属于 CC94,包括一个从猪身上采集的分离物(ST296)、一个从奶牛身上采集的分离物(ST2206)、一个从城市环境中采集的分离物(ST1205)和另一个从公共汽车上采集的分离物(ST800)。讨论本研究强调了临床相关肠球菌在健康家畜和环境中的高流行率。尽管不存在万古霉素耐药性和有限的医院感染相关克隆菌系,但粪肠球菌具有强大的致病力,并且对人类和兽医领域的重要抗生素具有耐药性,这突出表明有必要对非临床储库进行持续监控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
4837
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Microbiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire spectrum of microbiology. Field Chief Editor Martin G. Klotz at Washington State University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信