Variation in Long-Term Postoperative Mortality Risk by Race/Ethnicity After Major Non-cardiac Surgeries in the Veterans Health Administration

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Sherene E. Sharath, Courtney J. Balentine, David H. Berger, Min Zhan, Nader Zamani, Justin Chin-Bong Choi, Panos Kougias
{"title":"Variation in Long-Term Postoperative Mortality Risk by Race/Ethnicity After Major Non-cardiac Surgeries in the Veterans Health Administration","authors":"Sherene E. Sharath, Courtney J. Balentine, David H. Berger, Min Zhan, Nader Zamani, Justin Chin-Bong Choi, Panos Kougias","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02176-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Few large sample studies have examined whether disparities, as measured by the proxy of race/ethnicity, are observed in long-term mortality after high-risk operations performed in a United States national health system. We compared operation year-related mortality risk by race/ethnicity after high-risk operative interventions among patients receiving care within the VHA.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>From the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse and Surgical Quality Improvement Program, data were retrieved for 426,695 patients undergoing high-risk surgical procedures in non-cardiac, general, vascular, thoracic, orthopedic, neurosurgery, and genitourinary specialties between 2000 and 2018. Operation year was used as a surrogate measure of advances in technology and perioperative management. Underrepresented race/ethnicity groups were compared in a binary form with Caucasian/White race, as the reference category. The primary outcome was time to mortality, defined as death occurring at any time, due to any cause, during follow up, and after the initial, eligible surgery.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The median follow-up after 537,448 operations among 426,695 patients was 4.8 years. After adjustment for preoperative risk factors and demographics, long-term mortality risk decreased significantly to a hazard ratio of 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.962 to 0.964) over calendar time. Long-term mortality was not significantly higher among African Americans/Blacks compared to Caucasians/Whites (<i>p</i> = 0.22). Among Hispanics, differences in mortality risk favored Caucasians/Whites in the early years under study—a difference that dissipated as time progressed. In the most recent years, no difference in mortality was observed among Asian/Native Americans and Caucasians/Whites.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Risk-adjusted long-term mortality after high-risk operations among Veterans Affairs hospitals did not significantly vary between African Americans/Blacks, Hispanics, and Asian/Native Americans groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02176-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Few large sample studies have examined whether disparities, as measured by the proxy of race/ethnicity, are observed in long-term mortality after high-risk operations performed in a United States national health system. We compared operation year-related mortality risk by race/ethnicity after high-risk operative interventions among patients receiving care within the VHA.

Methods

From the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse and Surgical Quality Improvement Program, data were retrieved for 426,695 patients undergoing high-risk surgical procedures in non-cardiac, general, vascular, thoracic, orthopedic, neurosurgery, and genitourinary specialties between 2000 and 2018. Operation year was used as a surrogate measure of advances in technology and perioperative management. Underrepresented race/ethnicity groups were compared in a binary form with Caucasian/White race, as the reference category. The primary outcome was time to mortality, defined as death occurring at any time, due to any cause, during follow up, and after the initial, eligible surgery.

Results

The median follow-up after 537,448 operations among 426,695 patients was 4.8 years. After adjustment for preoperative risk factors and demographics, long-term mortality risk decreased significantly to a hazard ratio of 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.962 to 0.964) over calendar time. Long-term mortality was not significantly higher among African Americans/Blacks compared to Caucasians/Whites (p = 0.22). Among Hispanics, differences in mortality risk favored Caucasians/Whites in the early years under study—a difference that dissipated as time progressed. In the most recent years, no difference in mortality was observed among Asian/Native Americans and Caucasians/Whites.

Conclusions

Risk-adjusted long-term mortality after high-risk operations among Veterans Affairs hospitals did not significantly vary between African Americans/Blacks, Hispanics, and Asian/Native Americans groups.

Abstract Image

退伍军人健康管理局重大非心脏手术后不同种族/族裔的术后长期死亡率风险差异
背景很少有大样本研究对美国国家医疗系统中高风险手术后的长期死亡率是否存在种族/人种代用指标的差异进行研究。我们比较了退伍军人事务部内接受治疗的患者在高风险手术干预后不同种族/族裔的手术年相关死亡率风险。方法从退伍军人事务部企业数据仓库和手术质量改进计划中检索了 2000 年至 2018 年期间接受非心脏、普通、血管、胸腔、骨科、神经外科和泌尿生殖专科高风险手术治疗的 426,695 名患者的数据。手术年份被用作衡量技术和围手术期管理进步的替代指标。代表性不足的种族/民族群体以二元形式与高加索人/白人种族作为参照类别进行比较。主要结果是死亡时间,即在随访期间和首次合格手术后的任何时间因任何原因导致的死亡。在对术前风险因素和人口统计学因素进行调整后,长期死亡风险随着时间的推移显著下降,危险比为 0.96(95% 置信区间,0.962 至 0.964)。非裔美国人/黑人的长期死亡率并没有明显高于高加索人/白人(p = 0.22)。在西班牙裔美国人中,死亡率风险的差异在研究的最初几年更倾向于白种人/高加索人,但随着时间的推移,这种差异逐渐消失。结论在退伍军人事务医院进行高风险手术后,非裔美国人/黑人、西班牙裔美国人和亚裔/原住民群体之间的风险调整后长期死亡率没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信