Sherene E. Sharath, Courtney J. Balentine, David H. Berger, Min Zhan, Nader Zamani, Justin Chin-Bong Choi, Panos Kougias
{"title":"Variation in Long-Term Postoperative Mortality Risk by Race/Ethnicity After Major Non-cardiac Surgeries in the Veterans Health Administration","authors":"Sherene E. Sharath, Courtney J. Balentine, David H. Berger, Min Zhan, Nader Zamani, Justin Chin-Bong Choi, Panos Kougias","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02176-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Few large sample studies have examined whether disparities, as measured by the proxy of race/ethnicity, are observed in long-term mortality after high-risk operations performed in a United States national health system. We compared operation year-related mortality risk by race/ethnicity after high-risk operative interventions among patients receiving care within the VHA.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>From the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse and Surgical Quality Improvement Program, data were retrieved for 426,695 patients undergoing high-risk surgical procedures in non-cardiac, general, vascular, thoracic, orthopedic, neurosurgery, and genitourinary specialties between 2000 and 2018. Operation year was used as a surrogate measure of advances in technology and perioperative management. Underrepresented race/ethnicity groups were compared in a binary form with Caucasian/White race, as the reference category. The primary outcome was time to mortality, defined as death occurring at any time, due to any cause, during follow up, and after the initial, eligible surgery.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The median follow-up after 537,448 operations among 426,695 patients was 4.8 years. After adjustment for preoperative risk factors and demographics, long-term mortality risk decreased significantly to a hazard ratio of 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.962 to 0.964) over calendar time. Long-term mortality was not significantly higher among African Americans/Blacks compared to Caucasians/Whites (<i>p</i> = 0.22). Among Hispanics, differences in mortality risk favored Caucasians/Whites in the early years under study—a difference that dissipated as time progressed. In the most recent years, no difference in mortality was observed among Asian/Native Americans and Caucasians/Whites.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Risk-adjusted long-term mortality after high-risk operations among Veterans Affairs hospitals did not significantly vary between African Americans/Blacks, Hispanics, and Asian/Native Americans groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02176-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Few large sample studies have examined whether disparities, as measured by the proxy of race/ethnicity, are observed in long-term mortality after high-risk operations performed in a United States national health system. We compared operation year-related mortality risk by race/ethnicity after high-risk operative interventions among patients receiving care within the VHA.
Methods
From the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse and Surgical Quality Improvement Program, data were retrieved for 426,695 patients undergoing high-risk surgical procedures in non-cardiac, general, vascular, thoracic, orthopedic, neurosurgery, and genitourinary specialties between 2000 and 2018. Operation year was used as a surrogate measure of advances in technology and perioperative management. Underrepresented race/ethnicity groups were compared in a binary form with Caucasian/White race, as the reference category. The primary outcome was time to mortality, defined as death occurring at any time, due to any cause, during follow up, and after the initial, eligible surgery.
Results
The median follow-up after 537,448 operations among 426,695 patients was 4.8 years. After adjustment for preoperative risk factors and demographics, long-term mortality risk decreased significantly to a hazard ratio of 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.962 to 0.964) over calendar time. Long-term mortality was not significantly higher among African Americans/Blacks compared to Caucasians/Whites (p = 0.22). Among Hispanics, differences in mortality risk favored Caucasians/Whites in the early years under study—a difference that dissipated as time progressed. In the most recent years, no difference in mortality was observed among Asian/Native Americans and Caucasians/Whites.
Conclusions
Risk-adjusted long-term mortality after high-risk operations among Veterans Affairs hospitals did not significantly vary between African Americans/Blacks, Hispanics, and Asian/Native Americans groups.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.