The effect of a blooming artifact reduction filter on the dimensional analysis of implants

Matheus Akira Sakurada DDS MSc, Luiz Eduardo Gregoris Rabelo DDS MSc PhD, Ivonete Barreto Haagsma DDS, Luis Carlos do Carmo Filho DDS MSc PhD, Carlos Estrela DDS MSc PhD, Isabela Reginaldo DDS, Thais Marques Simek Vega Gonçalves DDS MSc PhD
{"title":"The effect of a blooming artifact reduction filter on the dimensional analysis of implants","authors":"Matheus Akira Sakurada DDS MSc, Luiz Eduardo Gregoris Rabelo DDS MSc PhD, Ivonete Barreto Haagsma DDS, Luis Carlos do Carmo Filho DDS MSc PhD, Carlos Estrela DDS MSc PhD, Isabela Reginaldo DDS, Thais Marques Simek Vega Gonçalves DDS MSc PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To assess the effect of a blooming artifact reduction (BAR) filter on cone beam computed tomography images (CBCT) in the dimensional analysis of dental implants. Six types of implants ( = 5 for each type) composed of titanium (3 types), titanium-zirconia alloy, zirconium oxide, and titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy, and made with 2 manufacturing processes (milled and printed) were individually installed in a bovine rib block according to the manufacturer's protocol. CBCT images were acquired with i-CAT and Carestream 9600 scanners, randomized, and analyzed without and with the e-Vol DX BAR filter (60 images for each scanner). Implant length, diameter, and thread-to-thread distance were measured by two radiologists, with a stereomicroscopic image of each implant as the reference standard for calculation of distortion in measurements. Repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were applied (α = 0.05). The BAR filter significantly reduced distortion in various parameters for specific implants, aligning closely with stereomicroscopic measurements. Titanium and printed implants showed reduced dimensional distortion regardless of BAR filter use. Carestream measurements presented smaller dimensional differences than i-CAT for most implants and parameters, especially without BAR ( < .05). Interexaminer reliability was good to excellent, with ICC ranging from 0.80 to 0.95. The BAR filter can enhance implant dimensional analysis, although variations based on implant material and manufacturing process were observed.","PeriodicalId":501075,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the effect of a blooming artifact reduction (BAR) filter on cone beam computed tomography images (CBCT) in the dimensional analysis of dental implants. Six types of implants ( = 5 for each type) composed of titanium (3 types), titanium-zirconia alloy, zirconium oxide, and titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy, and made with 2 manufacturing processes (milled and printed) were individually installed in a bovine rib block according to the manufacturer's protocol. CBCT images were acquired with i-CAT and Carestream 9600 scanners, randomized, and analyzed without and with the e-Vol DX BAR filter (60 images for each scanner). Implant length, diameter, and thread-to-thread distance were measured by two radiologists, with a stereomicroscopic image of each implant as the reference standard for calculation of distortion in measurements. Repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were applied (α = 0.05). The BAR filter significantly reduced distortion in various parameters for specific implants, aligning closely with stereomicroscopic measurements. Titanium and printed implants showed reduced dimensional distortion regardless of BAR filter use. Carestream measurements presented smaller dimensional differences than i-CAT for most implants and parameters, especially without BAR ( < .05). Interexaminer reliability was good to excellent, with ICC ranging from 0.80 to 0.95. The BAR filter can enhance implant dimensional analysis, although variations based on implant material and manufacturing process were observed.
减少模糊伪影过滤器对植入物尺寸分析的影响
目的:评估锥形束计算机断层扫描图像(CBCT)在牙科植入物的尺寸分析中使用花斑伪影减少(BAR)滤波器的效果。按照生产商的规程,将六种类型的种植体(每种类型 5 个)分别安装在牛肋骨块上,这些种植体由钛(3 种)、钛-氧化锆合金、氧化锆和钛-铝-钒合金组成,采用两种生产工艺(铣削和印刷)制造。使用 i-CAT 和 Carestream 9600 扫描仪采集 CBCT 图像,对图像进行随机化处理,并在不使用和使用 e-Vol DX BAR 过滤器的情况下对图像进行分析(每台扫描仪各采集 60 幅图像)。由两名放射科医生测量种植体的长度、直径和螺纹间距,并以每个种植体的立体显微镜图像作为计算测量失真的参考标准。采用重复测量方差分析,并进行 Bonferroni 校正和类内相关系数 (ICC) 计算(α = 0.05)。BAR 过滤器明显减少了特定种植体各种参数的失真,与体视显微镜测量结果非常吻合。无论是否使用 BAR 过滤器,钛和印刷种植体的尺寸变形都有所减少。对于大多数种植体和参数,Carestream 测量的尺寸差异比 i-CAT 测量的尺寸差异要小,尤其是在不使用 BAR 的情况下 ( < .05)。检查者之间的可靠性从良好到极佳,ICC 在 0.80 到 0.95 之间。BAR 过滤器可以提高种植体的尺寸分析能力,但根据种植体材料和生产工艺的不同也会出现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信