Postoperative pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery in elderly patients and its association with patient-controlled analgesia

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Qiulan He, Zhenyi Lai, Senyi Peng, Shiqing Lin, Guohui Mo, Xu Zhao, Zhongxing Wang
{"title":"Postoperative pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery in elderly patients and its association with patient-controlled analgesia","authors":"Qiulan He, Zhenyi Lai, Senyi Peng, Shiqing Lin, Guohui Mo, Xu Zhao, Zhongxing Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05337-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to identify the risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery and to investigate the relationship between patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and PPCs. A retrospective study. Clinical data and demographic information of elderly patients (aged ≥ 60 years) who underwent upper abdominal surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from 2017 to 2019 were retrospectively collected. Patients with PPCs were identified using the Melbourne Group Scale Version 2 scoring system. A directed acyclic graph was used to identify the potential confounders, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors for PPCs. Propensity score matching was utilized to compare PPC rates between patients with and without PCA, as well as between intravenous PCA (PCIA) and epidural PCA (PCEA) groups. A total of 1,467 patients were included, with a PPC rate of 8.7%. Multivariable analysis revealed that PCA was an independent protective factor for PPCs in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (odds ratio = 0.208, 95% confidence interval = 0.121 to 0.358; P < 0.001). After matching, patients receiving PCA demonstrated a significantly lower overall incidence of PPCs (8.6% vs. 26.3%, P < 0.001), unplanned transfer to the intensive care unit (1.1% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.001), and in-hospital mortality (0.7% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.021) compared to those not receiving PCA. No significant difference in outcomes was observed between patients receiving PCIA or PCEA after matching. Patient-controlled analgesia, whether administered intravenously or epidurally, is associated with a reduced risk of PPCs in elderly patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery.","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05337-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to identify the risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery and to investigate the relationship between patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and PPCs. A retrospective study. Clinical data and demographic information of elderly patients (aged ≥ 60 years) who underwent upper abdominal surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from 2017 to 2019 were retrospectively collected. Patients with PPCs were identified using the Melbourne Group Scale Version 2 scoring system. A directed acyclic graph was used to identify the potential confounders, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors for PPCs. Propensity score matching was utilized to compare PPC rates between patients with and without PCA, as well as between intravenous PCA (PCIA) and epidural PCA (PCEA) groups. A total of 1,467 patients were included, with a PPC rate of 8.7%. Multivariable analysis revealed that PCA was an independent protective factor for PPCs in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (odds ratio = 0.208, 95% confidence interval = 0.121 to 0.358; P < 0.001). After matching, patients receiving PCA demonstrated a significantly lower overall incidence of PPCs (8.6% vs. 26.3%, P < 0.001), unplanned transfer to the intensive care unit (1.1% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.001), and in-hospital mortality (0.7% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.021) compared to those not receiving PCA. No significant difference in outcomes was observed between patients receiving PCIA or PCEA after matching. Patient-controlled analgesia, whether administered intravenously or epidurally, is associated with a reduced risk of PPCs in elderly patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery.
老年患者腹部大手术后肺部并发症及其与患者自控镇痛的关系
本研究旨在确定接受大型腹部手术的老年患者术后肺部并发症(PPCs)的风险因素,并探讨患者自控镇痛(PCA)与 PPCs 之间的关系。这是一项回顾性研究。回顾性收集2017年至2019年在中山大学附属第一医院接受上腹部手术的老年患者(年龄≥60岁)的临床资料和人口统计学信息。采用墨尔本组量表第2版评分系统识别PPC患者。采用有向无环图确定潜在混杂因素,并进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定PPCs的独立风险因素。利用倾向得分匹配法比较了有 PCA 和无 PCA 患者之间以及静脉 PCA (PCIA) 和硬膜外 PCA (PCEA) 组之间的 PPC 发生率。共纳入了 1,467 名患者,PPC 发生率为 8.7%。多变量分析显示,PCA是老年腹部大手术患者发生PPC的独立保护因素(几率比=0.208,95%置信区间=0.121至0.358;P<0.001)。匹配后,与未接受 PCA 的患者相比,接受 PCA 的患者 PPCs(8.6% vs. 26.3%,P < 0.001)、意外转入重症监护室(1.1% vs. 8.4%,P = 0.001)和院内死亡率(0.7% vs. 5.3%,P = 0.021)的总体发生率均显著降低。在匹配后,接受 PCIA 或 PCEA 的患者在预后方面无明显差异。在接受上腹部大手术的老年患者中,患者自控镇痛(无论是静脉内给药还是硬膜外给药)与降低 PPCs 风险有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信