Application of Gaussian Process Regression for Bench Blasting Rock Fragmentation Prediction and Optimization at Wolongan Open-Pit Mine

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING
Eric Munene Kinyua, Zhang Jianhua, Gang Huang, Randriamamphionona M. Dinaniaina, Richard M. Kasomo, Sami Ullah
{"title":"Application of Gaussian Process Regression for Bench Blasting Rock Fragmentation Prediction and Optimization at Wolongan Open-Pit Mine","authors":"Eric Munene Kinyua, Zhang Jianhua, Gang Huang, Randriamamphionona M. Dinaniaina, Richard M. Kasomo, Sami Ullah","doi":"10.1007/s42461-024-01050-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study developed a Gaussian process regression (GPR) model to predict and optimize blast fragmentation at Wolongan Mine by using the primary data from the mine and secondary data from other mines. The blast data comprised 125 datasets, each containing seven blast design parameters as inputs and the muckpile mean fragment size as the model output. Additionally, the study developed artificial neural networks (ANNs), support vector regression (SVR), and multiple linear regression (MLR) models, and compared their prediction performances with the GPR model. The models’ accuracies were evaluated using five statistical metrics, including coefficient of determination (<span>\\({R}^{2}\\)</span>), root mean square error (RMSE), variance accounted for (VAF), mean absolute bias error (MABE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The GPR model outperformed the other models, with <span>\\({R}^{2}\\)</span>, RMSE, VAF, MABE, and MAPE values of 0.9302, 0.0487, 93.2670, 0.0383, and 13.9405, respectively, for the test data. Based on the top-down correlation and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance analyses on the four sensitivity analysis methods used, the study found that the in situ block size and Young’s modulus of the rock were the most important parameters affecting fragmentation. Using the GPR model, the study showed that reducing the blast burden by 13–23% could decrease the mean fragment size of the muckpile at Wolongan Mine by 6–12%, leading to a significant reduction in the percentage of boulders.</p>","PeriodicalId":18588,"journal":{"name":"Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-024-01050-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study developed a Gaussian process regression (GPR) model to predict and optimize blast fragmentation at Wolongan Mine by using the primary data from the mine and secondary data from other mines. The blast data comprised 125 datasets, each containing seven blast design parameters as inputs and the muckpile mean fragment size as the model output. Additionally, the study developed artificial neural networks (ANNs), support vector regression (SVR), and multiple linear regression (MLR) models, and compared their prediction performances with the GPR model. The models’ accuracies were evaluated using five statistical metrics, including coefficient of determination (\({R}^{2}\)), root mean square error (RMSE), variance accounted for (VAF), mean absolute bias error (MABE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The GPR model outperformed the other models, with \({R}^{2}\), RMSE, VAF, MABE, and MAPE values of 0.9302, 0.0487, 93.2670, 0.0383, and 13.9405, respectively, for the test data. Based on the top-down correlation and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance analyses on the four sensitivity analysis methods used, the study found that the in situ block size and Young’s modulus of the rock were the most important parameters affecting fragmentation. Using the GPR model, the study showed that reducing the blast burden by 13–23% could decrease the mean fragment size of the muckpile at Wolongan Mine by 6–12%, leading to a significant reduction in the percentage of boulders.

Abstract Image

卧龙岗露天矿台阶爆破岩石破碎预测与优化中的高斯过程回归应用
本研究利用卧龙庵煤矿的原始数据和其他煤矿的二手数据,建立了一个高斯过程回归(GPR)模型,用于预测和优化卧龙庵煤矿的爆破破碎率。爆破数据由 125 个数据集组成,每个数据集包含七个爆破设计参数作为输入,泥堆平均破碎尺寸作为模型输出。此外,研究还开发了人工神经网络 (ANN)、支持向量回归 (SVR) 和多元线性回归 (MLR) 模型,并将其预测性能与 GPR 模型进行了比较。研究使用五个统计指标评估了模型的准确性,包括决定系数(\({R}^{2}\))、均方根误差(RMSE)、方差占比(VAF)、平均绝对偏差误差(MABE)和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)。对于测试数据,GPR 模型的 \({R}^{2}\)、RMSE、VAF、MABE 和 MAPE 值分别为 0.9302、0.0487、93.2670、0.0383 和 13.9405,优于其他模型。根据对所使用的四种灵敏度分析方法进行的自上而下的相关性和 Kendall 协整系数分析,研究发现原位块度和岩石的杨氏模量是影响破碎的最重要参数。通过使用 GPR 模型,研究表明减少 13-23% 的爆破负荷可使卧龙庵矿区泥石堆的平均碎块尺寸减少 6-12%,从而显著降低巨石的比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: The aim of this international peer-reviewed journal of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration (SME) is to provide a broad-based forum for the exchange of real-world and theoretical knowledge from academia, government and industry that is pertinent to mining, mineral/metallurgical processing, exploration and other fields served by the Society. The journal publishes high-quality original research publications, in-depth special review articles, reviews of state-of-the-art and innovative technologies and industry methodologies, communications of work of topical and emerging interest, and other works that enhance understanding on both the fundamental and practical levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信