The fate of pollen in two morphologically contrasting buzz-pollinated Solanum flowers

Christian Ary Vasquez-Castro, Elodie Morel, Bernardo Garcia-Simpson, Mario Vallejo-Marin
{"title":"The fate of pollen in two morphologically contrasting buzz-pollinated Solanum flowers","authors":"Christian Ary Vasquez-Castro, Elodie Morel, Bernardo Garcia-Simpson, Mario Vallejo-Marin","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.01.610688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study premise: Pollen transfer efficiency (PTE) and pollen deposition patterns on a pollinator's body significantly influence plant reproductive success. However, studies on pollen fates (i.e., the destination of pollen grains after being released) in animal-pollinated species, particularly those offering pollen as the sole reward, are limited. Here, we investigated pollen fates in two nectarless, buzz-pollinated Solanum species with contrasting floral morphology. Methods: We conducted experimental trials involving one pollen donor and four recipient flowers of Solanum rostratum and S. dulcamara, using captive Bombus terrestris as pollinator. After each trial, we assessed the amount of pollen remaining in the anthers, deposited on stigmas, placed on the pollinator, and falling to the ground. We then estimated pollen fates and PTE, and modelled their pollen deposition curves. Key results: We found that S. rostratum produced more pollen but had a more restricted pollen dispensing schedule compared to S. dulcamara. Although PTE was similar between species (0.72% vs. 1.07%, for S. rostratum and S. dulcamara, respectively), pollen loss mainly occurred due to falling to the ground in S. rostratum and bee grooming in S. dulcamara, potentially explained by their different floral architectures. Both species exhibited a typical exponential decay pattern in pollen deposition, with the first visited flowers receiving the most outcross pollen. Conclusions: Our results suggest that PTE in pollen-rewarding, buzz-pollinated species is quantitatively similar to that in nectar-rewarding flowers with single pollen units (PTE = 1-2%), and that different buzz-pollinated flower architectures achieve similar PTE although through different pollen-loss pathways.","PeriodicalId":501341,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Plant Biology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Plant Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.01.610688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study premise: Pollen transfer efficiency (PTE) and pollen deposition patterns on a pollinator's body significantly influence plant reproductive success. However, studies on pollen fates (i.e., the destination of pollen grains after being released) in animal-pollinated species, particularly those offering pollen as the sole reward, are limited. Here, we investigated pollen fates in two nectarless, buzz-pollinated Solanum species with contrasting floral morphology. Methods: We conducted experimental trials involving one pollen donor and four recipient flowers of Solanum rostratum and S. dulcamara, using captive Bombus terrestris as pollinator. After each trial, we assessed the amount of pollen remaining in the anthers, deposited on stigmas, placed on the pollinator, and falling to the ground. We then estimated pollen fates and PTE, and modelled their pollen deposition curves. Key results: We found that S. rostratum produced more pollen but had a more restricted pollen dispensing schedule compared to S. dulcamara. Although PTE was similar between species (0.72% vs. 1.07%, for S. rostratum and S. dulcamara, respectively), pollen loss mainly occurred due to falling to the ground in S. rostratum and bee grooming in S. dulcamara, potentially explained by their different floral architectures. Both species exhibited a typical exponential decay pattern in pollen deposition, with the first visited flowers receiving the most outcross pollen. Conclusions: Our results suggest that PTE in pollen-rewarding, buzz-pollinated species is quantitatively similar to that in nectar-rewarding flowers with single pollen units (PTE = 1-2%), and that different buzz-pollinated flower architectures achieve similar PTE although through different pollen-loss pathways.
两种形态截然不同的嗡嗡授粉茄花的花粉命运
研究前提:花粉传递效率(PTE)和花粉在授粉者身体上的沉积模式对植物的繁殖成功率有很大影响。然而,有关动物授粉物种花粉命运(即花粉粒释放后的去向)的研究非常有限,尤其是那些以花粉作为唯一回报的物种。在此,我们研究了两种无花蜜、嗡嗡授粉且花朵形态截然不同的茄科植物的花粉命运。研究方法我们使用人工饲养的土蜂作为授粉昆虫,对茄科植物茄属(Solanum rostratum)和茄属(S. dulcamara)的一朵授粉花和四朵受粉花进行了实验。每次试验后,我们都会评估花粉在花药中的剩余量、柱头上的沉积量、授粉器上的花粉量以及掉落地面的花粉量。然后,我们估算了花粉的命运和PTE,并模拟了它们的花粉沉积曲线。主要结果我们发现,与杜鹃花相比,萝藦科植物产生的花粉更多,但花粉散布时间更有限。虽然两种植物的 PTE 相似(S. rostratum 和 S. dulcamara 的 PTE 分别为 0.72% 和 1.07%),但花粉损失主要发生在 S. rostratum 落到地面和 S. dulcamara 被蜜蜂梳理的过程中,这可能是它们不同的花卉结构造成的。两个物种的花粉沉积都呈现出典型的指数衰减模式,最先到访的花朵获得的外交花粉最多。结论我们的研究结果表明,花粉奖励型嗡嗡授粉物种的PTE与花蜜奖励型单花粉单位花卉的PTE(PTE = 1-2%)在数量上相似,不同的嗡嗡授粉花卉结构虽然通过不同的花粉损失途径实现相似的PTE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信