Risk of Suicide, Hair Loss, and Aspiration with GLP1-Receptor Agonists and Other Diabetic Agents: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Michael Nakhla, Ambica Nair, Prachi Balani, Aditi Ujjawal, Pramukh Arun Kumar, Mahati Dasari, Zeynep Yukselen, Kannu Bansal, Sarju Ganatra, Sourbha S. Dani
{"title":"Risk of Suicide, Hair Loss, and Aspiration with GLP1-Receptor Agonists and Other Diabetic Agents: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study","authors":"Michael Nakhla, Ambica Nair, Prachi Balani, Aditi Ujjawal, Pramukh Arun Kumar, Mahati Dasari, Zeynep Yukselen, Kannu Bansal, Sarju Ganatra, Sourbha S. Dani","doi":"10.1007/s10557-024-07613-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>With the increasing popularity of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs), numerous safety concerns arose pertaining to suicide, hair loss, and aspiration risks. We attempted to validate these concerns.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We queried four pharmacovigilance databases to compare GLP1-RAs to sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) with respect to these adverse events (AE): the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), the Australian Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN), the European Medicines Agency’s (EudraVigilance), and the World Health Organization-Vigibase. OpenVigil 2.1 was utilized to perform a disproportionality analysis for GLP1-RAs, SGLT2is, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4is), sulfonylureas, metformin, and insulin. The following indices were extracted from the FAERS database from Q4/2003 until Q3/2023: relative reporting ratio (RRR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), and chi-squared (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>). A positive signal was detected if PRR &gt; 2 and <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 4 for any drug-event pair.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>No positive signals were observed between GLP1-RAs and either suicide, hair loss, or aspiration risks. Semaglutide [ROR = 0.60 (0.51–0.71)] and liraglutide [ROR = 0.28 (0.23–0.35)] had higher suicidal events than DPP4is and SGLT2is. GLP1-RAs were the most reported class with hair loss [ROR = 0.61 (0.60–0.64)], and semaglutide, liraglutide, and dulaglutide were the three leading medications. GLP1-RAs ranked lower with aspiration events, which were led by sitagliptin and DPP4is as a group.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>GLP1-RAs exhibit higher reporting of suicide, hair loss, and aspiration events when compared to several other antidiabetic medications despite not meeting the criteria for positive signals yet. This warrants intensive monitoring and reporting.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":9557,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-024-07613-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

With the increasing popularity of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs), numerous safety concerns arose pertaining to suicide, hair loss, and aspiration risks. We attempted to validate these concerns.

Methods

We queried four pharmacovigilance databases to compare GLP1-RAs to sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) with respect to these adverse events (AE): the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), the Australian Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN), the European Medicines Agency’s (EudraVigilance), and the World Health Organization-Vigibase. OpenVigil 2.1 was utilized to perform a disproportionality analysis for GLP1-RAs, SGLT2is, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4is), sulfonylureas, metformin, and insulin. The following indices were extracted from the FAERS database from Q4/2003 until Q3/2023: relative reporting ratio (RRR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), and chi-squared (χ2). A positive signal was detected if PRR > 2 and χ2 > 4 for any drug-event pair.

Results

No positive signals were observed between GLP1-RAs and either suicide, hair loss, or aspiration risks. Semaglutide [ROR = 0.60 (0.51–0.71)] and liraglutide [ROR = 0.28 (0.23–0.35)] had higher suicidal events than DPP4is and SGLT2is. GLP1-RAs were the most reported class with hair loss [ROR = 0.61 (0.60–0.64)], and semaglutide, liraglutide, and dulaglutide were the three leading medications. GLP1-RAs ranked lower with aspiration events, which were led by sitagliptin and DPP4is as a group.

Conclusion

GLP1-RAs exhibit higher reporting of suicide, hair loss, and aspiration events when compared to several other antidiabetic medications despite not meeting the criteria for positive signals yet. This warrants intensive monitoring and reporting.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

GLP1 受体激动剂和其他糖尿病药物的自杀、脱发和吸入风险:真实世界药物警戒研究
目的随着胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂(GLP1-RA)越来越受欢迎,出现了许多有关自杀、脱发和吸入风险的安全问题。我们试图验证这些担忧。方法我们查询了四个药物警戒数据库,以比较 GLP1-RAs 和钠-葡萄糖转运体 2 抑制剂 (SGLT2is) 在这些不良事件 (AE) 方面的情况:FDA 不良事件报告系统 (FAERS)、澳大利亚不良事件通知数据库 (DAEN)、欧洲药品管理局 (EudraVigilance) 和世界卫生组织-Vigibase。OpenVigil 2.1 用于对 GLP1-RAs、SGLT2is、二肽基肽酶 4 抑制剂 (DPP4is)、磺脲类药物、二甲双胍和胰岛素进行比例失调分析。从 2003 年第四季度至 2023 年第三季度的 FAERS 数据库中提取了以下指数:相对报告比 (RRR)、比例报告比 (PRR)、报告几率比 (ROR) 和卡方 (χ2)。结果未观察到 GLP1-RAs 与自杀、脱发或吸入风险之间存在阳性信号。塞马鲁肽[ROR = 0.60 (0.51-0.71)]和利拉鲁肽[ROR = 0.28 (0.23-0.35)]的自杀事件高于DPP4is和SGLT2is。GLP1-RAs 是报告脱发事件最多的一类药物[ROR = 0.61 (0.60-0.64)],而塞马鲁肽、利拉鲁肽和度拉鲁肽是三种主要药物。结论尽管尚未达到阳性信号的标准,但与其他几种抗糖尿病药物相比,GLP1-RA 表现出较高的自杀、脱发和吸入事件报告率。这就需要加强监测和报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Designed to objectively cover the process of bench to bedside development of cardiovascular drug, device and cell therapy, and to bring you the information you need most in a timely and useful format, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy takes a fresh and energetic look at advances in this dynamic field. Homing in on the most exciting work being done on new therapeutic agents, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy focusses on developments in atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, ischemic syndromes and arrhythmias. The Journal is an authoritative source of current and relevant information that is indispensable for basic and clinical investigators aiming for novel, breakthrough research as well as for cardiologists seeking to best serve their patients. Providing you with a single, concise reference tool acknowledged to be among the finest in the world, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is listed in Web of Science and PubMed/Medline among other abstracting and indexing services. The regular articles and frequent special topical issues equip you with an up-to-date source defined by the need for accurate information on an ever-evolving field. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is a careful and accurate guide through the maze of new products and therapies which furnishes you with the details on cardiovascular pharmacology that you will refer to time and time again.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信