The impact of preoperative treatments on the immune environment of rectal cancer

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Apmis Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1111/apm.13467
Erkki‐Ville Wirta, Hanna Elomaa, Maarit Ahtiainen, Marja Hyöty, Toni T. Seppälä, Teijo Kuopio, Jan Böhm, Jukka‐Pekka Mecklin, Juha P. Väyrynen
{"title":"The impact of preoperative treatments on the immune environment of rectal cancer","authors":"Erkki‐Ville Wirta, Hanna Elomaa, Maarit Ahtiainen, Marja Hyöty, Toni T. Seppälä, Teijo Kuopio, Jan Böhm, Jukka‐Pekka Mecklin, Juha P. Väyrynen","doi":"10.1111/apm.13467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To improve local disease control, the use of preoperative radiotherapy either alone or combined with chemotherapy has become standard practice in rectal cancer, but it is unclear how these treatments modify the antitumoral immune response. We aimed to evaluate tumor histopathologic features and the prognostic effect of host immune response in rectal cancer with variable treatment modalities. Ninety‐five rectal cancers with short‐course radiotherapy (SRT), 97 with long‐course chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and 154 without preoperative treatments, were evaluated for histopathologic features including Crohn's‐like reaction (CLR). CD3+ and CD8+ immunohistochemistry and tumor cells were analyzed from tumor tissue microarray samples to calculate T‐cell densities and G‐cross function values to estimate cancer cell–T‐cell co‐localization (proximity score). We found that lymphocyte densities were diminished after SRT, but CLR was scarcer after CRT. Proximity score and CLR density were prognostic for survival in cancer without preoperative treatments and could be combined into an enhanced prognostic score (immune grade). In the irradiated tumors, CLR density remained prognostic while the impact of T‐cell infiltration was insufficient alone. In multivariable analysis, the immune grade proved to be an independent prognostic factor for survival. In conclusion, the immune contexture of rectal cancer harbors prognostic significance even after preoperative radiotherapy.","PeriodicalId":8167,"journal":{"name":"Apmis","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apmis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To improve local disease control, the use of preoperative radiotherapy either alone or combined with chemotherapy has become standard practice in rectal cancer, but it is unclear how these treatments modify the antitumoral immune response. We aimed to evaluate tumor histopathologic features and the prognostic effect of host immune response in rectal cancer with variable treatment modalities. Ninety‐five rectal cancers with short‐course radiotherapy (SRT), 97 with long‐course chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and 154 without preoperative treatments, were evaluated for histopathologic features including Crohn's‐like reaction (CLR). CD3+ and CD8+ immunohistochemistry and tumor cells were analyzed from tumor tissue microarray samples to calculate T‐cell densities and G‐cross function values to estimate cancer cell–T‐cell co‐localization (proximity score). We found that lymphocyte densities were diminished after SRT, but CLR was scarcer after CRT. Proximity score and CLR density were prognostic for survival in cancer without preoperative treatments and could be combined into an enhanced prognostic score (immune grade). In the irradiated tumors, CLR density remained prognostic while the impact of T‐cell infiltration was insufficient alone. In multivariable analysis, the immune grade proved to be an independent prognostic factor for survival. In conclusion, the immune contexture of rectal cancer harbors prognostic significance even after preoperative radiotherapy.
术前治疗对直肠癌免疫环境的影响
为改善局部疾病控制,术前单独放疗或结合化疗已成为直肠癌的标准治疗方法,但这些治疗方法如何改变抗肿瘤免疫反应尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估肿瘤组织病理学特征以及宿主免疫反应对采用不同治疗方式的直肠癌预后的影响。我们对接受短程放疗(SRT)的 95 例直肠癌、接受长程化放疗(CRT)的 97 例直肠癌和未接受术前治疗的 154 例直肠癌进行了组织病理学特征评估,包括克罗恩病样反应(CLR)。通过对肿瘤组织芯片样本中的 CD3+ 和 CD8+ 免疫组化及肿瘤细胞进行分析,计算出 T 细胞密度和 G-cross 函数值,从而估算出癌细胞-T 细胞共定位(邻近度评分)。我们发现,SRT 后淋巴细胞密度降低,但 CRT 后 CLR 减少。邻近度评分和CLR密度可预测未接受术前治疗的癌症患者的生存率,并可合并成一个增强的预后评分(免疫分级)。在接受过放射治疗的肿瘤中,CLR密度仍是预后因素,而T细胞浸润的单独影响则不足。在多变量分析中,免疫分级被证明是生存率的独立预后因素。总之,即使在术前放疗后,直肠癌的免疫环境仍对预后有重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Apmis
Apmis 医学-病理学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: APMIS, formerly Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, has been published since 1924 by the Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology as a non-profit-making scientific journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信