Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block Vs. Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through Perichondrial Approach for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Esra Turunc, Burhan Dost, Elif Sarikaya Ozel, Cengiz Kaya, Yasemin B. Ustun, Sezgin Bilgin, Gokhan S. Ozbalci, Ersin Koksal
{"title":"Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block Vs. Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through Perichondrial Approach for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study","authors":"Esra Turunc, Burhan Dost, Elif Sarikaya Ozel, Cengiz Kaya, Yasemin B. Ustun, Sezgin Bilgin, Gokhan S. Ozbalci, Ersin Koksal","doi":"10.1007/s11695-024-07454-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>The objective of the present study was to evaluate morphine consumption and pain scores 24 h postoperatively to compare the effects of a bilateral External Oblique Intercostal (EOI) block with those of a Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Trough Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) block in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Fifty-eight patients aged between 18 and 65 years of with American Society of Anesthesiologists class II–III were included in this randomized, double-blinded study. Patients were assigned into two groups either EOI block or M-TAPA block. The primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption within the first postoperative 24 h. Secondary outcomes were numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and during activity, QoR-15 Patient Questionnaire scores, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), number of patients requiring rescue analgesic and antiemetics drugs, and complications.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of morphine consumption in the first 24 h (EOI block; 10.74 ± 3.94 mg vs. M-TAPA block; 11.67 ± 4.66 mg, respectively). In addition, no significant difference between the two groups in the NRS and PONV scores, total QoR-15 scores, and the number of patients requiring rescue analgesics and antiemetics.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>EOI block and M-TAPA block showed similar effectiveness for morphine consumption within 24 h postoperatively and in pain scores in LSG.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07454-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The objective of the present study was to evaluate morphine consumption and pain scores 24 h postoperatively to compare the effects of a bilateral External Oblique Intercostal (EOI) block with those of a Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Trough Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) block in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

Methods

Fifty-eight patients aged between 18 and 65 years of with American Society of Anesthesiologists class II–III were included in this randomized, double-blinded study. Patients were assigned into two groups either EOI block or M-TAPA block. The primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption within the first postoperative 24 h. Secondary outcomes were numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and during activity, QoR-15 Patient Questionnaire scores, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), number of patients requiring rescue analgesic and antiemetics drugs, and complications.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of morphine consumption in the first 24 h (EOI block; 10.74 ± 3.94 mg vs. M-TAPA block; 11.67 ± 4.66 mg, respectively). In addition, no significant difference between the two groups in the NRS and PONV scores, total QoR-15 scores, and the number of patients requiring rescue analgesics and antiemetics.

Conclusions

EOI block and M-TAPA block showed similar effectiveness for morphine consumption within 24 h postoperatively and in pain scores in LSG.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术患者术后镇痛的双侧超声引导下肋间外斜神经阻滞与经软骨周围入路的改良胸腹神经阻滞:随机对照研究
引言 本研究旨在评估腹腔镜袖带胃切除术(LSG)术后 24 小时的吗啡消耗量和疼痛评分,比较双侧肋间外斜肌阻滞(EOI)和改良胸腹神经阻滞经软骨周围入路(M-TAPA)阻滞的效果。患者被分为两组,一组为 EOI 阻滞,另一组为 M-TAPA 阻滞。次要结果包括休息和活动时的数字评分量表(NRS)评分、QoR-15 患者问卷评分、术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)发生率、需要使用镇痛和止吐药的患者人数以及并发症。结果两组患者在头 24 小时的吗啡消耗量(EOI 阻滞:10.74±3.94 毫克;M-TAPA 阻滞:11.67±4.66 毫克)无统计学差异。结论EOI阻滞和M-TAPA阻滞在LSG术后24小时内的吗啡消耗量和疼痛评分方面显示出相似的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信