Data-driven computational mechanics: comparison of model-free and model-based methods in constitutive modeling

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS
Julien Philipp Stöcker, Selina Heinzig, Abhinav Anil Khedkar, Michael Kaliske
{"title":"Data-driven computational mechanics: comparison of model-free and model-based methods in constitutive modeling","authors":"Julien Philipp Stöcker,&nbsp;Selina Heinzig,&nbsp;Abhinav Anil Khedkar,&nbsp;Michael Kaliske","doi":"10.1007/s00419-024-02664-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In computational homogenization approaches, data-driven methods entail advantages due to their ability to capture complex behavior without assuming a specific material model. Within this domain, constitutive model-based and model-free data-driven methods are distinguished. The former employ artificial neural networks as models to approximate a constitutive relation, whereas the latter directly incorporate stress–strain data in the analysis. Neural network-based constitutive descriptions are one of the most widely used data-driven approaches in computational mechanics. In contrast, distance-minimizing data-driven computational mechanics enables substituting the material modeling step entirely by iteratively obtaining a physically consistent solution close to the material behavior represented by the data. The maximum entropy data-driven solver is a generalization of this method, providing increased robustness concerning outliers in the underlying data set. Additionally, a tensor voting enhancement based on incorporating locally linear tangent spaces enables interpolating in regions of sparse sampling. In this contribution, a comparison of neural network-based constitutive models and data-driven computational mechanics is made. General differences between machine learning, distance minimizing, and entropy maximizing data-driven methods are explored. These include the pre-processing of data and the required computational effort for optimization as well as evaluation. Numerical examples with synthetically generated datasets obtained by numerical material tests are employed to demonstrate the capabilities of the investigated methods. An anisotropic nonlinear elastic constitutive law is chosen for the investigation. The resulting constitutive representations are then applied in structural simulations. Thereby, differences in the solution procedure as well as use-case accuracy of the methods are investigated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":477,"journal":{"name":"Archive of Applied Mechanics","volume":"94 9","pages":"2683 - 2718"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00419-024-02664-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive of Applied Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00419-024-02664-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In computational homogenization approaches, data-driven methods entail advantages due to their ability to capture complex behavior without assuming a specific material model. Within this domain, constitutive model-based and model-free data-driven methods are distinguished. The former employ artificial neural networks as models to approximate a constitutive relation, whereas the latter directly incorporate stress–strain data in the analysis. Neural network-based constitutive descriptions are one of the most widely used data-driven approaches in computational mechanics. In contrast, distance-minimizing data-driven computational mechanics enables substituting the material modeling step entirely by iteratively obtaining a physically consistent solution close to the material behavior represented by the data. The maximum entropy data-driven solver is a generalization of this method, providing increased robustness concerning outliers in the underlying data set. Additionally, a tensor voting enhancement based on incorporating locally linear tangent spaces enables interpolating in regions of sparse sampling. In this contribution, a comparison of neural network-based constitutive models and data-driven computational mechanics is made. General differences between machine learning, distance minimizing, and entropy maximizing data-driven methods are explored. These include the pre-processing of data and the required computational effort for optimization as well as evaluation. Numerical examples with synthetically generated datasets obtained by numerical material tests are employed to demonstrate the capabilities of the investigated methods. An anisotropic nonlinear elastic constitutive law is chosen for the investigation. The resulting constitutive representations are then applied in structural simulations. Thereby, differences in the solution procedure as well as use-case accuracy of the methods are investigated.

Abstract Image

数据驱动的计算力学:比较无模型和基于模型的构成建模方法
在计算均质化方法中,数据驱动方法因其无需假定特定材料模型即可捕捉复杂行为的能力而具有优势。在这一领域,有基于构成模型的方法和无模型数据驱动方法之分。前者采用人工神经网络作为模型来逼近构成关系,而后者则直接将应力应变数据纳入分析。基于神经网络的构造描述是计算力学中应用最广泛的数据驱动方法之一。相比之下,距离最小化数据驱动计算力学可以通过迭代获得与数据所代表的材料行为相近的物理一致解,从而完全取代材料建模步骤。最大熵数据驱动求解器是对这一方法的概括,提高了对基础数据集中异常值的鲁棒性。此外,基于局部线性切线空间的张量投票增强功能可以在采样稀疏的区域进行插值。本文对基于神经网络的构成模型和数据驱动的计算力学进行了比较。本文探讨了机器学习、距离最小化和熵最大化数据驱动方法之间的一般差异。这些差异包括数据的预处理、优化和评估所需的计算工作量。通过数值材料测试合成的数据集来展示所研究方法的能力。研究选择了各向异性的非线性弹性结构定律。然后,在结构模拟中应用所得到的构成表征。由此,研究了这些方法在求解过程中的差异以及使用情况下的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archive of Applied Mechanics serves as a platform to communicate original research of scholarly value in all branches of theoretical and applied mechanics, i.e., in solid and fluid mechanics, dynamics and vibrations. It focuses on continuum mechanics in general, structural mechanics, biomechanics, micro- and nano-mechanics as well as hydrodynamics. In particular, the following topics are emphasised: thermodynamics of materials, material modeling, multi-physics, mechanical properties of materials, homogenisation, phase transitions, fracture and damage mechanics, vibration, wave propagation experimental mechanics as well as machine learning techniques in the context of applied mechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信