Comparative analysis between the impacts produced by centralized biowaste management – a hospitality sector case study in Brazil

IF 3.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Igor do Nascimento Quaresma, Audrey Tanguy, Gilson Barbosa Athayde Júnior, Mariana Moreira De Oliveira, Joácio de Araújo Morais Júnior, Armando Borges De Castilhos Junior, Igor Belli, Rémy Bayard
{"title":"Comparative analysis between the impacts produced by centralized biowaste management – a hospitality sector case study in Brazil","authors":"Igor do Nascimento Quaresma, Audrey Tanguy, Gilson Barbosa Athayde Júnior, Mariana Moreira De Oliveira, Joácio de Araújo Morais Júnior, Armando Borges De Castilhos Junior, Igor Belli, Rémy Bayard","doi":"10.1007/s13399-024-06075-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article aims to evaluate the environmental impacts of different centralized biowaste management scenarios from the hospitality sector of the tourist city of João Pessoa, Brazil. To this end, a life cycle assessment was carried out, comparing different scenarios for the centralized treatment of biowaste based on territorial characteristics. The life cycle inventory was built using the Ecoinvent 3.0.1 database and Simapro software. The environmental impacts were assessed using the CML method, considering eight categories of impacts, such as global warming by greenhouse gases (GHG) and ozone layer depletion. The results show that the disposal of biowaste in João Pessoa's landfill (current management scenario) has significant environmental impacts when compared to diverting this waste to composting or anaerobic digestion, for example, in the global warming category, where the net impact of the landfill is 1.045 kg CO2 eq, while that of composting and anaerobic digestion is 0.18 and 0.17 kg CO2 eq, respectively. Furthermore, the comparison between centralized composting and anaerobic digestion indicates that composting is the scenario that produces the least negative environmental impacts for 62% of the categories analyzed. Therefore, this article points out that the current management of biowaste from the hotel sector in João Pessoa has several negative environmental impacts, making it necessary to implement actions that promote diverting biowaste flow from the landfill to other centralized treatment systems. It should be noted that an interdisciplinary analysis is needed to assess the social and economic aspects of the best option for treating and recovering organic waste.</p>","PeriodicalId":488,"journal":{"name":"Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-06075-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to evaluate the environmental impacts of different centralized biowaste management scenarios from the hospitality sector of the tourist city of João Pessoa, Brazil. To this end, a life cycle assessment was carried out, comparing different scenarios for the centralized treatment of biowaste based on territorial characteristics. The life cycle inventory was built using the Ecoinvent 3.0.1 database and Simapro software. The environmental impacts were assessed using the CML method, considering eight categories of impacts, such as global warming by greenhouse gases (GHG) and ozone layer depletion. The results show that the disposal of biowaste in João Pessoa's landfill (current management scenario) has significant environmental impacts when compared to diverting this waste to composting or anaerobic digestion, for example, in the global warming category, where the net impact of the landfill is 1.045 kg CO2 eq, while that of composting and anaerobic digestion is 0.18 and 0.17 kg CO2 eq, respectively. Furthermore, the comparison between centralized composting and anaerobic digestion indicates that composting is the scenario that produces the least negative environmental impacts for 62% of the categories analyzed. Therefore, this article points out that the current management of biowaste from the hotel sector in João Pessoa has several negative environmental impacts, making it necessary to implement actions that promote diverting biowaste flow from the landfill to other centralized treatment systems. It should be noted that an interdisciplinary analysis is needed to assess the social and economic aspects of the best option for treating and recovering organic waste.

Abstract Image

集中式生物垃圾管理所产生影响的比较分析--巴西酒店业案例研究
本文旨在评估巴西旅游城市若昂佩索阿酒店业不同的生物垃圾集中管理方案对环境的影响。为此,我们进行了生命周期评估,比较了基于地域特征的不同生物垃圾集中处理方案。使用 Ecoinvent 3.0.1 数据库和 Simapro 软件建立了生命周期清单。使用 CML 方法评估了对环境的影响,考虑了八类影响,如温室气体导致的全球变暖和臭氧层破坏。结果表明,在若昂-佩索阿垃圾填埋场处理生物垃圾(目前的管理方案)与将这些垃圾转用于堆肥或厌氧发酵相比,对环境有重大影响,例如,在全球变暖类别中,垃圾填埋场的净影响为 1.045 千克二氧化碳当量,而堆肥和厌氧发酵的净影响分别为 0.18 千克和 0.17 千克二氧化碳当量。此外,集中堆肥和厌氧消化的比较表明,在 62% 的分析类别中,堆肥是对环境产生负面影响最小的方案。因此,本文指出,目前若昂佩索阿酒店业的生物废物管理对环境产生了一些负面影响,因此有必要采取行动,促进生物废物从垃圾填埋场流向其他集中处理系统。应该指出的是,需要进行跨学科分析,以评估处理和回收有机废物最佳方案的社会和经济方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1358
期刊介绍: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery presents articles and information on research, development and applications in thermo-chemical conversion; physico-chemical conversion and bio-chemical conversion, including all necessary steps for the provision and preparation of the biomass as well as all possible downstream processing steps for the environmentally sound and economically viable provision of energy and chemical products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信