Comparative life cycle assessment of woody biomass processing: air classification, drying, and size reduction powered by bioelectricity versus grid electricity

IF 3.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Ashlee Edmonson, Yingqian Lin, Mark Mba-Wright, Diana Byrne, Ling Ding, Jian Shi
{"title":"Comparative life cycle assessment of woody biomass processing: air classification, drying, and size reduction powered by bioelectricity versus grid electricity","authors":"Ashlee Edmonson, Yingqian Lin, Mark Mba-Wright, Diana Byrne, Ling Ding, Jian Shi","doi":"10.1007/s13399-024-06038-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sulfur accumulation during biofuel production is pollutive and toxic to conversion catalysts and causes the premature breakdown of processing equipment. Air classification is an effective preprocessing technology for ash and sulfur reduction from biomass feedstocks. A life cycle assessment (LCA) sought to understand the environmental impact of implementing air classification as a sulfur-mitigation technique to improve feedstock quality for pine residues using a grid electricity scenario (GES) versus a bioelectricity scenario (BES). Global warming potential (GWP) for preprocessing was simulated using inventory databases embedded in SimaPro and the Argonne National Laboratory’s GREET model, specifically focusing on comparing the GWP of a GES versus a BES. Overall, the GES had a GWP impact over seven times that of the BES (136 versus 18 kg CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent per tonne of usable feedstock), with steam generation during rotary drying accounting for 57% of the GES’s GWP. Air classification represents 0.4% and 1.6% of the total GWP impact for the GES and BES, respectively. Therefore, air classification can facilitate a 30% reduction in feedstock sulfur content to improve feedstock quality for biofuel conversion and lessen corrosion of equipment while contributing minimal GWP impact during preprocessing.</p>","PeriodicalId":488,"journal":{"name":"Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-06038-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sulfur accumulation during biofuel production is pollutive and toxic to conversion catalysts and causes the premature breakdown of processing equipment. Air classification is an effective preprocessing technology for ash and sulfur reduction from biomass feedstocks. A life cycle assessment (LCA) sought to understand the environmental impact of implementing air classification as a sulfur-mitigation technique to improve feedstock quality for pine residues using a grid electricity scenario (GES) versus a bioelectricity scenario (BES). Global warming potential (GWP) for preprocessing was simulated using inventory databases embedded in SimaPro and the Argonne National Laboratory’s GREET model, specifically focusing on comparing the GWP of a GES versus a BES. Overall, the GES had a GWP impact over seven times that of the BES (136 versus 18 kg CO2 equivalent per tonne of usable feedstock), with steam generation during rotary drying accounting for 57% of the GES’s GWP. Air classification represents 0.4% and 1.6% of the total GWP impact for the GES and BES, respectively. Therefore, air classification can facilitate a 30% reduction in feedstock sulfur content to improve feedstock quality for biofuel conversion and lessen corrosion of equipment while contributing minimal GWP impact during preprocessing.

Abstract Image

木质生物质加工的生命周期比较评估:以生物电力和电网电力为动力的空气分级、干燥和粒度减小工艺
在生物燃料生产过程中,硫的积累会对转化催化剂造成污染和毒害,并导致加工设备过早损坏。空气分级是减少生物质原料灰分和硫分的有效预处理技术。一项生命周期评估(LCA)试图了解采用空气分级作为硫减排技术对环境的影响,该技术利用电网电力方案(GES)和生物电力方案(BES)改善松树残渣的原料质量。使用 SimaPro 和阿贡国家实验室 GREET 模型中嵌入的清单数据库模拟了预处理的全球升温潜能值 (GWP),重点比较了 GES 和 BES 的全球升温潜能值。总体而言,GES 的全球升温潜能值是 BES 的七倍多(每吨可用原料产生 136 对 18 千克二氧化碳当量),旋转干燥过程中产生的蒸汽占 GES 全球升温潜能值的 57%。空气分级分别占 GES 和 BES 全球升温潜能值总影响的 0.4% 和 1.6%。因此,空气分级可将原料硫含量降低 30%,从而提高生物燃料转化的原料质量,减少对设备的腐蚀,同时将预处理期间的 GWP 影响降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1358
期刊介绍: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery presents articles and information on research, development and applications in thermo-chemical conversion; physico-chemical conversion and bio-chemical conversion, including all necessary steps for the provision and preparation of the biomass as well as all possible downstream processing steps for the environmentally sound and economically viable provision of energy and chemical products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信