The potential impact of universal screening for vasa previa in the prevention of stillbirths

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Weiyu Zhang, Yinka Oyelese, Ali Javinani, Alireza Shamshirsaz, Ranjit Akolekar
{"title":"The potential impact of universal screening for vasa previa in the prevention of stillbirths","authors":"Weiyu Zhang, Yinka Oyelese, Ali Javinani, Alireza Shamshirsaz, Ranjit Akolekar","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To estimate the number of pregnancies complicated by vasa previa annually in nine developed countries, and the potential preventable stillbirths associated with undiagnosed cases. We also assessed the potential impact of universal screening for vasa previa on reducing stillbirth rates. Methods We utilized nationally-reported birth and stillbirth data from public databases in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Greece, Sweden, Portugal, and Australia. Using the annual number of births and the number and rate of stillbirths in each country, and the published incidence of vasa previa and stillbirth rates associated with the condition, we estimated the expected annual number of cases of vasa previa, those that would result in a livebirth, and the potential preventable stillbirths with and without prenatal diagnosis. Results There were 6,099,118 total annual births with 32,550 stillbirths, corresponding to a summary stillbirth rate of 5.34 per 1,000 pregnancies. The total expected vasa previa cases was estimated to be 5,007 (95 % CI: 3,208–7,201). The estimated number of livebirths would be 4,937 (95 % CI: 3,163–7,100) and 3,610 (95 % CI: 2,313–5,192) in pregnancies with and without a prenatal diagnosis of VP. This implies that prenatal diagnosis would potentially prevent 1,327 (95 % CI: 850–1,908) stillbirths in these countries, corresponding to a potential reduction in stillbirth rate by 4.72 % (95 % CI: 3.80–5.74) if routine screening for vasa previa was performed. Conclusions Our study highlights the importance of universal screening for vasa previa and suggests that prenatal diagnosis of prevention could potentially reduce 4–5 % of stillbirths.","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To estimate the number of pregnancies complicated by vasa previa annually in nine developed countries, and the potential preventable stillbirths associated with undiagnosed cases. We also assessed the potential impact of universal screening for vasa previa on reducing stillbirth rates. Methods We utilized nationally-reported birth and stillbirth data from public databases in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Greece, Sweden, Portugal, and Australia. Using the annual number of births and the number and rate of stillbirths in each country, and the published incidence of vasa previa and stillbirth rates associated with the condition, we estimated the expected annual number of cases of vasa previa, those that would result in a livebirth, and the potential preventable stillbirths with and without prenatal diagnosis. Results There were 6,099,118 total annual births with 32,550 stillbirths, corresponding to a summary stillbirth rate of 5.34 per 1,000 pregnancies. The total expected vasa previa cases was estimated to be 5,007 (95 % CI: 3,208–7,201). The estimated number of livebirths would be 4,937 (95 % CI: 3,163–7,100) and 3,610 (95 % CI: 2,313–5,192) in pregnancies with and without a prenatal diagnosis of VP. This implies that prenatal diagnosis would potentially prevent 1,327 (95 % CI: 850–1,908) stillbirths in these countries, corresponding to a potential reduction in stillbirth rate by 4.72 % (95 % CI: 3.80–5.74) if routine screening for vasa previa was performed. Conclusions Our study highlights the importance of universal screening for vasa previa and suggests that prenatal diagnosis of prevention could potentially reduce 4–5 % of stillbirths.
普遍筛查前置胎盘对预防死胎的潜在影响
目的 估计九个发达国家每年因前置胎盘而并发症的妊娠数量,以及与未确诊病例相关的潜在可预防死产数量。我们还评估了普及前置胎盘筛查对降低死胎率的潜在影响。方法 我们利用了美国、英国、加拿大、德国、爱尔兰、希腊、瑞典、葡萄牙和澳大利亚公共数据库中的全国性出生和死产数据。利用每个国家的年出生人数、死胎数和死胎率,以及已公布的前置胎盘的发病率和死胎率,我们估算了每年预计发生的前置胎盘病例数、可导致活产的病例数,以及进行和不进行产前诊断的潜在可预防死胎数。结果 每年共有 6,099,118 例新生儿,其中 32,550 例死胎,死胎率为 5.34‰。预计前置胎盘病例总数为 5,007 例(95 % CI:3,208-7,201)。在产前诊断出 VP 和未产前诊断出 VP 的孕妇中,估计活产数分别为 4,937 例(95 % CI:3,163-7,100 例)和 3,610 例(95 % CI:2,313-5,192 例)。这意味着,在这些国家,产前诊断将有可能防止 1,327 例(95 % CI:850-1,908 例)死胎的发生,如果常规筛查前置胎盘,死胎率将有可能降低 4.72 %(95 % CI:3.80-5.74)。结论 我们的研究强调了普遍筛查前置胎盘的重要性,并表明产前诊断预防可能会减少 4%-5% 的死胎率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信