Magnitude and predictors of elasticity of demand for morphine are similar in male and female rats

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Andrew C. Harris, Peter Muelken, Shirelle X. Liu, John R. Smethells, Mark G. LeSage, Jonathan C. Gewirtz
{"title":"Magnitude and predictors of elasticity of demand for morphine are similar in male and female rats","authors":"Andrew C. Harris, Peter Muelken, Shirelle X. Liu, John R. Smethells, Mark G. LeSage, Jonathan C. Gewirtz","doi":"10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1443364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionSex differences in vulnerability to opioid use disorder (OUD) have been reported in some clinical and preclinical studies, but findings are mixed and further research is needed in this area. The goal of this study was to compare elasticity of demand (reinforcement efficacy) in an i.v. morphine self-administration (SA) model in male and female rats using a translationally relevant behavioral economics approach. Rate of acquisition and predictors of individual differences in demand (e.g., cumulative morphine infusions during acquisition) were also evaluated in both sexes.Materials, methods, and resultsAcquisition of morphine SA (0.4 mg/kg/infusion) under a fixed ratio (FR) 1 schedule of reinforcement was slower and infusions earned were lower in females than in males (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 30–31/sex), but infusions earned did not differ between sexes during the FR 2 and FR 3 phases of acquisition. Increases in the FR response requirement across sessions during demand testing (FR 1–FR 96) resulted in a progressive reduction in morphine infusions in both sexes. Morphine consumption was well-described by an exponential demand function in both sexes and was associated with considerable individual vulnerability. There were no sex differences in elasticity of demand (rate of decline in morphine consumption with increasing price) or intensity of demand (consumption at zero price). A higher number of infusions earned during the FR 2 and FR 3 phases of acquisition and greater maximum response rates during demand testing were associated with lower demand elasticity (i.e., greater reinforcing efficacy) in both males and females, whereas other relationships were sex-specific (e.g., higher intensity of demand was associated with lower elasticity of demand in males but not in females).ConclusionOur findings indicate similar elasticity of demand and predictors of individual differences in demand for morphine in male and female rats, although sex differences were observed in initial rate of acquisition and in some correlations between morphine SA measures. These data are consistent with findings of similar OUD vulnerability in males and females in some human and animal studies.","PeriodicalId":12368,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1443364","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionSex differences in vulnerability to opioid use disorder (OUD) have been reported in some clinical and preclinical studies, but findings are mixed and further research is needed in this area. The goal of this study was to compare elasticity of demand (reinforcement efficacy) in an i.v. morphine self-administration (SA) model in male and female rats using a translationally relevant behavioral economics approach. Rate of acquisition and predictors of individual differences in demand (e.g., cumulative morphine infusions during acquisition) were also evaluated in both sexes.Materials, methods, and resultsAcquisition of morphine SA (0.4 mg/kg/infusion) under a fixed ratio (FR) 1 schedule of reinforcement was slower and infusions earned were lower in females than in males (n = 30–31/sex), but infusions earned did not differ between sexes during the FR 2 and FR 3 phases of acquisition. Increases in the FR response requirement across sessions during demand testing (FR 1–FR 96) resulted in a progressive reduction in morphine infusions in both sexes. Morphine consumption was well-described by an exponential demand function in both sexes and was associated with considerable individual vulnerability. There were no sex differences in elasticity of demand (rate of decline in morphine consumption with increasing price) or intensity of demand (consumption at zero price). A higher number of infusions earned during the FR 2 and FR 3 phases of acquisition and greater maximum response rates during demand testing were associated with lower demand elasticity (i.e., greater reinforcing efficacy) in both males and females, whereas other relationships were sex-specific (e.g., higher intensity of demand was associated with lower elasticity of demand in males but not in females).ConclusionOur findings indicate similar elasticity of demand and predictors of individual differences in demand for morphine in male and female rats, although sex differences were observed in initial rate of acquisition and in some correlations between morphine SA measures. These data are consistent with findings of similar OUD vulnerability in males and females in some human and animal studies.
雌雄大鼠对吗啡需求弹性的大小和预测因素相似
导言:一些临床和临床前研究已经报道了阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)易感性的性别差异,但研究结果喜忧参半,该领域还需要进一步研究。本研究的目的是采用一种可转化的行为经济学方法,比较雌雄大鼠在静脉注射吗啡自我给药(SA)模型中的需求弹性(强化效能)。材料、方法和结果在固定比率(FR)1强化计划下,雌性大鼠获得吗啡自我给药(0.4 mg/kg/次)的速度比雄性大鼠慢,获得的吗啡输注量也比雄性大鼠低(n = 30-31/性别),但在获得吗啡自我给药的FR 2和FR 3阶段,雌雄大鼠获得的吗啡输注量没有差异。在需求测试(FR 1-FR 96)期间,FR反应要求的增加导致了两性吗啡输注量的逐渐减少。两性的吗啡消耗量都可以用指数需求函数很好地描述,并且与个体的易损性有关。在需求弹性(吗啡消耗量随价格上涨而下降的速度)或需求强度(零价格时的消耗量)方面没有性别差异。在获取吗啡的 FR 2 和 FR 3 阶段,男性和女性获得的输液次数越多,在需求测试期间的最大反应率越高,则需求弹性越低(即强化效果越强),而其他关系则具有性别特异性(例如,需求强度越高,则需求弹性越低)、结论我们的研究结果表明,尽管在初始获取率和吗啡 SA 测量值之间的某些相关性方面观察到了性别差异,但雌雄大鼠对吗啡的需求弹性和个体差异的预测因素相似。这些数据与一些人类和动物研究中发现的雌雄大鼠类似的 OUD 易感性是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying behavior. Field Chief Editor Nuno Sousa at the Instituto de Pesquisa em Ciências da Vida e da Saúde (ICVS) is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. This journal publishes major insights into the neural mechanisms of animal and human behavior, and welcomes articles studying the interplay between behavior and its neurobiological basis at all levels: from molecular biology and genetics, to morphological, biochemical, neurochemical, electrophysiological, neuroendocrine, pharmacological, and neuroimaging studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信