Lucy Hutchinson and the English Revolution: Gender, Genre, and History Writing by Claire Gheeraert-Graffeuille (review)

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
PARERGON Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1353/pgn.2024.a935352
Paul Salzman
{"title":"Lucy Hutchinson and the English Revolution: Gender, Genre, and History Writing by Claire Gheeraert-Graffeuille (review)","authors":"Paul Salzman","doi":"10.1353/pgn.2024.a935352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Lucy Hutchinson and the English Revolution: Gender, Genre, and History Writing</em> by Claire Gheeraert-Graffeuille <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Paul Salzman </li> </ul> Gheeraert-Graffeuille, Claire, <em>Lucy Hutchinson and the English Revolution: Gender, Genre, and History Writing</em>, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022; hardback; pp. 368; R.R.P. £76.00; ISBN 9780192857538. <p>Early modern women's writing has been experiencing a golden era over the last decade, with increasing numbers of fine critical studies, editions, and (with the occasional hiccup) a steep rise in general interest. While a growing acknowledgement of the variety of early modern women's writing has been especially important, with attention being given to everything from recipes to advice manuals, to women's libraries and book use, there has also been a growing sense of the canonisation of some of the writers who fit clearly into established literary and historical categories of worth. Three that I think are especially notable in this regard are Mary Wroth, Lucy Hutchinson, and Aphra Behn, with perhaps Margaret Cavendish and Katherine Philips following closely. Scholarly editions remain a marker of literary merit, however arbitrary that might seem. In the case of Wroth, thanks to Josephine Roberts's pioneering editorial work we have editions of both parts of <em>Urania</em> and of her poetry, with the <em>oeuvre</em> completed by the recent Revels edition of <em>Loves Victory</em> by Alison Findlay and others. Following on from Janet Todd's <em>The Secret Life of Aphra Behn</em> (Rutgers University Press, 1997) we are now seeing a Cambridge University Press edition of Behn's complete works, headed up by Elaine Hobby. Hutchinson's <em>Memoir</em> of her husband was well known in the nineteenth century, where it went through several editions, and was edited by James Sutherland in the 1970s and by N. H. Keeble in the mid-1990s.</p> <p>With the attribution of Hutchinson's epic <em>Order and Disorder</em> by David Norbrook, and his subsequent edition (Wiley-Blackwell, 2001), and the attention paid to her remarkable translation of Lucretius, she is now an indispensable example of the entanglement of seventeenth-century literature with the momentous events of the Civil War and its aftermath. Oxford University Press is now halfway through an authoritative edition of Hutchinson's work under the general editorship of David Norbrook. It is in this context that Claire Gheeraert-Graffeuille's detailed study of Hutchinson's <em>Memoir</em> and its multiple contexts makes an extremely important contribution to our understanding of her as a writer, and of late seventeenth-century historiography in general. This is a very clever book because it manages to make a narrow focus on a single text into a wide-ranging account of Hutchinson, of early modern women's writing, and of the way that the idea of history in the later seventeenth century was an amalgam of what to a modern reader might seem like irreconcilable genres (for example, history/fiction). <strong>[End Page 317]</strong></p> <p>In the first chapter, Gheeraert-Graffeuille relates the <em>Memoir</em> to life writing and the idea of exemplarity, as well as the refinement of that idea in the seventeenth century, to take into account more modern notions of biography and history. The second chapter expands this account of theories of history and explores seventeenth-century tensions between what might be called exemplary history and critical history. Here Gheeraert-Graffeuille clarifies how the <em>Memoir</em>, as a blend 'of several genres of writing' (p. 109), allows Hutchinson to encompass the personal and ideological responses to the events of the Civil War. In the third chapter, Gheeraert-Graffeuille analyses the way that Hutchinson draws on her own direct experience of the Civil War, centred in Nottingham, and a variety of sources that Hutchinson also uses to flesh out her account.</p> <p>Hutchinson pieced together her account of the Civil War from a combination of personal experience and information provided by others—notably, in a remarkable but not unusual ideological balance, from her husband and her Royalist brother Sir Allen Apsley. In particular, Gheeraert-Graffeuille notes that 'Lucy Hutchinson's local point of view, anchored in Nottinghamshire affairs, allows her to write a history of the Civil War in which the local and national are tightly intertwined, as well as to give the reader an exceptional insight...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43576,"journal":{"name":"PARERGON","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PARERGON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pgn.2024.a935352","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Lucy Hutchinson and the English Revolution: Gender, Genre, and History Writing by Claire Gheeraert-Graffeuille
  • Paul Salzman
Gheeraert-Graffeuille, Claire, Lucy Hutchinson and the English Revolution: Gender, Genre, and History Writing, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022; hardback; pp. 368; R.R.P. £76.00; ISBN 9780192857538.

Early modern women's writing has been experiencing a golden era over the last decade, with increasing numbers of fine critical studies, editions, and (with the occasional hiccup) a steep rise in general interest. While a growing acknowledgement of the variety of early modern women's writing has been especially important, with attention being given to everything from recipes to advice manuals, to women's libraries and book use, there has also been a growing sense of the canonisation of some of the writers who fit clearly into established literary and historical categories of worth. Three that I think are especially notable in this regard are Mary Wroth, Lucy Hutchinson, and Aphra Behn, with perhaps Margaret Cavendish and Katherine Philips following closely. Scholarly editions remain a marker of literary merit, however arbitrary that might seem. In the case of Wroth, thanks to Josephine Roberts's pioneering editorial work we have editions of both parts of Urania and of her poetry, with the oeuvre completed by the recent Revels edition of Loves Victory by Alison Findlay and others. Following on from Janet Todd's The Secret Life of Aphra Behn (Rutgers University Press, 1997) we are now seeing a Cambridge University Press edition of Behn's complete works, headed up by Elaine Hobby. Hutchinson's Memoir of her husband was well known in the nineteenth century, where it went through several editions, and was edited by James Sutherland in the 1970s and by N. H. Keeble in the mid-1990s.

With the attribution of Hutchinson's epic Order and Disorder by David Norbrook, and his subsequent edition (Wiley-Blackwell, 2001), and the attention paid to her remarkable translation of Lucretius, she is now an indispensable example of the entanglement of seventeenth-century literature with the momentous events of the Civil War and its aftermath. Oxford University Press is now halfway through an authoritative edition of Hutchinson's work under the general editorship of David Norbrook. It is in this context that Claire Gheeraert-Graffeuille's detailed study of Hutchinson's Memoir and its multiple contexts makes an extremely important contribution to our understanding of her as a writer, and of late seventeenth-century historiography in general. This is a very clever book because it manages to make a narrow focus on a single text into a wide-ranging account of Hutchinson, of early modern women's writing, and of the way that the idea of history in the later seventeenth century was an amalgam of what to a modern reader might seem like irreconcilable genres (for example, history/fiction). [End Page 317]

In the first chapter, Gheeraert-Graffeuille relates the Memoir to life writing and the idea of exemplarity, as well as the refinement of that idea in the seventeenth century, to take into account more modern notions of biography and history. The second chapter expands this account of theories of history and explores seventeenth-century tensions between what might be called exemplary history and critical history. Here Gheeraert-Graffeuille clarifies how the Memoir, as a blend 'of several genres of writing' (p. 109), allows Hutchinson to encompass the personal and ideological responses to the events of the Civil War. In the third chapter, Gheeraert-Graffeuille analyses the way that Hutchinson draws on her own direct experience of the Civil War, centred in Nottingham, and a variety of sources that Hutchinson also uses to flesh out her account.

Hutchinson pieced together her account of the Civil War from a combination of personal experience and information provided by others—notably, in a remarkable but not unusual ideological balance, from her husband and her Royalist brother Sir Allen Apsley. In particular, Gheeraert-Graffeuille notes that 'Lucy Hutchinson's local point of view, anchored in Nottinghamshire affairs, allows her to write a history of the Civil War in which the local and national are tightly intertwined, as well as to give the reader an exceptional insight...

露西-哈钦森与英国革命:Claire Gheeraert-Graffeuille 所著《性别、体裁与历史写作》(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 露西-哈钦森与英国革命:Gheeraert-Graffeuille, Claire, Lucy Hutchinson and the English Revolution: Gender, Genre, and History Writing by Claire Gheeraert-Graffeuille Paul Salzman Gheeraert-Graffeuille, Claire, Lucy Hutchinson and the English Revolution:性别、体裁与历史写作》,牛津,牛津大学出版社,2022 年;精装本;368 页;零售价 76.00 英镑;国际标准书号 9780192857538。在过去的十年中,早期现代女性写作经历了一个黄金时代,越来越多的优秀评论性研究和版本,以及(偶尔出现的小插曲)普遍兴趣的急剧上升。对早期现代女性写作多样性的日益认可尤为重要,从食谱到建议手册,再到女性图书馆和书籍使用等各个方面都受到了关注,与此同时,一些明显符合既定文学和历史价值类别的作家也日益被奉为典范。在这方面,我认为玛丽-沃思(Mary Wroth)、露西-哈钦森(Lucy Hutchinson)和阿芙拉-贝恩(Aphra Behn)这三位作家尤为突出,玛格丽特-卡文迪什(Margaret Cavendish)和凯瑟琳-菲利浦斯(Katherine Philips)或许紧随其后。学术版本仍然是文学价值的标志,无论这看起来多么武断。就弗罗斯而言,由于约瑟芬-罗伯茨的开创性编辑工作,我们拥有了《乌拉尼亚》和她的诗歌的版本,而最近由艾莉森-芬德利等人出版的《爱的胜利》Revels 版本则使弗罗斯的作品更加完整。继珍妮特-托德(Janet Todd)的《阿芙拉-贝恩的秘密生活》(罗格斯大学出版社,1997 年)之后,我们现在又看到了由伊莱恩-霍比(Elaine Hobby)领导的剑桥大学出版社出版的贝恩作品全集。哈钦森的《丈夫回忆录》在 19 世纪就广为人知,历经多个版本,20 世纪 70 年代由詹姆斯-萨瑟兰编辑,20 世纪 90 年代中期由 N. H. 基布尔编辑。戴维-诺布鲁克 (David Norbrook) 将哈钦森的史诗《秩序与混乱》归功于哈钦森及其随后的版本(Wiley-Blackwell, 2001 年),她对卢克莱修的出色翻译也受到了关注,因此她现在是十七世纪文学与内战及其后的重大事件纠缠不清的一个不可或缺的例子。牛津大学出版社在大卫-诺布鲁克(David Norbrook)的总编辑下对哈钦森的作品进行了权威性的编辑,目前已经完成了一半。正是在这种背景下,克莱尔-盖拉尔-格拉弗耶对哈钦森的《回忆录》及其多重背景进行了详细研究,为我们了解她作为一名作家以及整个 17 世纪晚期历史学做出了极其重要的贡献。这是一本非常聪明的书,因为它成功地将对单一文本的狭隘关注变成了对哈钦森、对早期现代女性写作以及对 17 世纪晚期的历史观念是如何将现代读者看来似乎不可调和的体裁(如历史/小说)融合在一起的广泛论述。[在第一章中,Gheeraert-Graffeuille 将《回忆录》与生平写作和典范思想联系起来,并在 17 世纪对这一思想进行了完善,以考虑到更现代的传记和历史概念。第二章扩展了对历史理论的阐述,探讨了十七世纪典范史与批判史之间的紧张关系。在这里,Gheeraert-Graffeuille 阐明了《回忆录》作为 "几种写作体裁 "的融合(第 109 页),如何让哈钦森将个人和意识形态对内战事件的反应囊括其中。在第三章中,Gheeraert-Graffeuille 分析了哈钦森如何利用自己在诺丁汉的直接内战经历,以及哈钦森用来充实其叙述的各种资料来源。哈钦森从个人经历和他人提供的信息中拼凑出了她对内战的描述--尤其是她的丈夫和她的保皇党兄弟艾伦-阿普斯利爵士(Sir Allen Apsley)提供的信息,这在意识形态上是一种非同寻常的平衡。Gheeraert-Graffeuille 特别指出,"露西-哈钦森立足于诺丁汉郡事务,从地方视角出发,写出了一部地方与国家紧密交织的内战史,并为读者提供了非凡的洞察力......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PARERGON
PARERGON MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Parergon publishes articles and book reviews on all aspects of medieval and early modern studies. It has a particular focus on research which takes new approaches and crosses traditional disciplinary boundaries. Fully refereed and with an international Advisory Board, Parergon is the Southern Hemisphere"s leading journal for early European research. It is published by the Australian and New Zealand Association of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (Inc.) and has close links with the ARC Network for Early European Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信