Career Imprints from Diverse Institutional Settings: a Comparative Study of Academic and Non-academic Partnered Ventures in Technopolis

IF 4 3区经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Journal of the Knowledge Economy Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1007/s13132-024-02192-5

Ülkü Neslihan Aktaş, Erdal Akdeve

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research focused on the effects of prior experiences based on the imprinting theory that how individual-level imprints are transferred to the organizational level. The research attempted to answer the question of how owners’ career imprints affect the performance of ventures. Ventures operating in the technology sector were categorized according to their academic and industry background. The results showed that although academic-partnered ventures were found to generate more patents, their performance is lower than non-academic partnered ventures. This research has theoretical and practical contributions providing results that show different institutional contexts lead to different outcomes through the occupational imprinting effect.

查看原文本刊更多论文

来自不同机构环境的职业印记：科技城学术和非学术合作企业的比较研究

这项研究以印记理论为基础，重点关注先前经历的影响，即个人层面的印记如何转移到组织层面。研究试图回答企业主的职业印记如何影响企业绩效的问题。根据学术和行业背景对科技领域的风险企业进行了分类。结果表明，虽然学术合作型风险企业产生的专利更多，但其绩效却低于非学术合作型风险企业。这项研究具有理论和实践贡献，其结果表明，不同的制度背景会通过职业印记效应产生不同的结果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of the Knowledge Economy ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

5.90

自引率

27.30%

发文量

228

期刊介绍： In the context of rapid globalization and technological capacity, the world’s economies today are driven increasingly by knowledge—the expertise, skills, experience, education, understanding, awareness, perception, and other qualities required to communicate, interpret, and analyze information. New wealth is created by the application of knowledge to improve productivity—and to create new products, services, systems, and process (i.e., to innovate). The Journal of the Knowledge Economy focuses on the dynamics of the knowledge-based economy, with an emphasis on the role of knowledge creation, diffusion, and application across three economic levels: (1) the systemic ''meta'' or ''macro''-level, (2) the organizational ''meso''-level, and (3) the individual ''micro''-level. The journal incorporates insights from the fields of economics, management, law, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and political science to shed new light on the evolving role of knowledge, with a particular emphasis on how innovation can be leveraged to provide solutions to complex problems and issues, including global crises in environmental sustainability, education, and economic development. Articles emphasize empirical studies, underscoring a comparative approach, and, to a lesser extent, case studies and theoretical articles. The journal balances practice/application and theory/concepts.