Risk factors and a prediction model for pain recurrence after pancreatic stent removal in painful chronic pancreatitis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Tetsuya Takikawa,Kiyoshi Kume,Yu Tanaka,Kazuhiro Kikuta,Yohei Ogata,Waku Hatta,Shin Hamada,Shin Miura,Ryotaro Matsumoto,Takanori Sano,Akira Sasaki,Hidehiro Hayashi,Misako Sakano,Tomoo Manaka,Atsushi Masamune
{"title":"Risk factors and a prediction model for pain recurrence after pancreatic stent removal in painful chronic pancreatitis.","authors":"Tetsuya Takikawa,Kiyoshi Kume,Yu Tanaka,Kazuhiro Kikuta,Yohei Ogata,Waku Hatta,Shin Hamada,Shin Miura,Ryotaro Matsumoto,Takanori Sano,Akira Sasaki,Hidehiro Hayashi,Misako Sakano,Tomoo Manaka,Atsushi Masamune","doi":"10.1097/mpa.0000000000002392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nEndoscopic pancreatic stenting (EPS) is an effective treatment modality for painful chronic pancreatitis. However, little is known about the factors that cause pain recurrence after stent removal, and there are no clear criteria for stent removal. We aimed to develop a prediction model for pain recurrence by identifying its risk factors.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe retrospectively reviewed 95 patients who underwent EPS due to pain for the first time using a single plastic stent between January 2007 and July 2022 at our institute. Univariate and multivariate stepwise Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the risk factors for pain recurrence, and a prediction model was developed based on the identified factors.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 95 enrolled patients, 89 (93.7%) achieved pain relief and 73 (76.8%) did stent removal. Of the 69 patients with a follow-up period ≥6 months after stent removal, 29 (42.0%) had pain recurrence during the median follow-up period of 59 months. Serum lipase level (p = 0.034) and pancreatic parenchymal thickness (p = 0.022) on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were identified as independent risk factors for pain recurrence. The prediction model based on the identified factors had good discrimination ability, with a concordance index of 0.74, and could stratify pain recurrence rates.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWe identified the risk factors and developed a new prediction model for pain recurrence following stent removal. This model might be useful for decision-making in pancreatic stent management, such as deciding whether to remove a pancreatic stent, continue EPS, or convert to surgery.","PeriodicalId":19733,"journal":{"name":"Pancreas","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0000000000002392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Endoscopic pancreatic stenting (EPS) is an effective treatment modality for painful chronic pancreatitis. However, little is known about the factors that cause pain recurrence after stent removal, and there are no clear criteria for stent removal. We aimed to develop a prediction model for pain recurrence by identifying its risk factors. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 95 patients who underwent EPS due to pain for the first time using a single plastic stent between January 2007 and July 2022 at our institute. Univariate and multivariate stepwise Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the risk factors for pain recurrence, and a prediction model was developed based on the identified factors. RESULTS Of the 95 enrolled patients, 89 (93.7%) achieved pain relief and 73 (76.8%) did stent removal. Of the 69 patients with a follow-up period ≥6 months after stent removal, 29 (42.0%) had pain recurrence during the median follow-up period of 59 months. Serum lipase level (p = 0.034) and pancreatic parenchymal thickness (p = 0.022) on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were identified as independent risk factors for pain recurrence. The prediction model based on the identified factors had good discrimination ability, with a concordance index of 0.74, and could stratify pain recurrence rates. CONCLUSIONS We identified the risk factors and developed a new prediction model for pain recurrence following stent removal. This model might be useful for decision-making in pancreatic stent management, such as deciding whether to remove a pancreatic stent, continue EPS, or convert to surgery.
疼痛性慢性胰腺炎患者胰腺支架移除后疼痛复发的风险因素和预测模型。
目的内镜下胰腺支架植入术(EPS)是治疗疼痛性慢性胰腺炎的有效方法。然而,人们对导致支架取出后疼痛复发的因素知之甚少,而且没有明确的支架取出标准。我们旨在通过识别疼痛复发的风险因素来建立疼痛复发的预测模型。方法 我们回顾性地查看了本院在 2007 年 1 月至 2022 年 7 月间因疼痛首次使用单个塑料支架接受 EPS 的 95 例患者。采用单变量和多变量逐步Cox比例危险模型来确定疼痛复发的风险因素,并根据确定的因素建立了预测模型。结果 在95例入选患者中,89例(93.7%)疼痛缓解,73例(76.8%)支架拆除。在支架移除后随访时间≥6个月的69名患者中,有29人(42.0%)在中位随访59个月期间疼痛复发。血清脂肪酶水平(p = 0.034)和计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像显示的胰腺实质厚度(p = 0.022)被确定为疼痛复发的独立风险因素。结论我们确定了支架取出后疼痛复发的风险因素,并建立了一个新的预测模型。该模型可能有助于胰腺支架治疗的决策,如决定是移除胰腺支架、继续使用 EPS 还是转为手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pancreas
Pancreas 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
289
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Pancreas provides a central forum for communication of original works involving both basic and clinical research on the exocrine and endocrine pancreas and their interrelationships and consequences in disease states. This multidisciplinary, international journal covers the whole spectrum of basic sciences, etiology, prevention, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and surgical and medical management of pancreatic diseases, including cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信