Analysis of Velocity, Power and Skin Temperature in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes with Fixed and Variable Resistance

IF 2.2 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.3390/sports12090250
Gildo Francisco dos Santos Filho, Felipe J. Aidar, Márcio Getirana-Mota, Ciro José Brito, Esteban Aedo-Muñoz, Ângelo de Almeida Paz, Joilson Alves de Souza Leite Júnior, Edson Lucas Monteiro Vieira, Pantelis T. Nikolaidis
{"title":"Analysis of Velocity, Power and Skin Temperature in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes with Fixed and Variable Resistance","authors":"Gildo Francisco dos Santos Filho, Felipe J. Aidar, Márcio Getirana-Mota, Ciro José Brito, Esteban Aedo-Muñoz, Ângelo de Almeida Paz, Joilson Alves de Souza Leite Júnior, Edson Lucas Monteiro Vieira, Pantelis T. Nikolaidis","doi":"10.3390/sports12090250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Variable resistance training has been widely used in athletic preparation. Objectives: To analyze the use of currents (VRT) and the traditional method (TRAD) on speed, power and temperature in a training session. Methods: Fourteen paralympic powerlifting (PP) athletes took part over three weeks. In week 1, familiarization and 1RM tests took place, and, in weeks 2 and 3, pre- and post-training took place, where the propulsive mean velocity and power and temperatures were assessed before and after, at 24 h and 48 h. Results: There was a difference in the sternal pectoral temperatures before and after VRT (p = 0.040) and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (p = 0.018); in the clavicular pectoralis before and after VRT and TRAD (p = 0.003); in the anterior deltoid after and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (p = 0.026 and p = 0.017); and in the triceps after and at 24 h and 48 h between TRAD and VRT (p = 0.005). In the training series, the MPV was significant in TRAD between Set1 and Set5 (p = 0.003), in training (VRT) between Set1 and Set5 (p = 0.001) and in Set5 between the methods (p = 0.047). For power, there was a difference between Set1 and 5 in TRAD (p = 0.016) and VRT (p = 0.002). Conclusion: We conclude that training with currents (VRT) promoted greater muscle fatigue when compared to traditional training.","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12090250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Variable resistance training has been widely used in athletic preparation. Objectives: To analyze the use of currents (VRT) and the traditional method (TRAD) on speed, power and temperature in a training session. Methods: Fourteen paralympic powerlifting (PP) athletes took part over three weeks. In week 1, familiarization and 1RM tests took place, and, in weeks 2 and 3, pre- and post-training took place, where the propulsive mean velocity and power and temperatures were assessed before and after, at 24 h and 48 h. Results: There was a difference in the sternal pectoral temperatures before and after VRT (p = 0.040) and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (p = 0.018); in the clavicular pectoralis before and after VRT and TRAD (p = 0.003); in the anterior deltoid after and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (p = 0.026 and p = 0.017); and in the triceps after and at 24 h and 48 h between TRAD and VRT (p = 0.005). In the training series, the MPV was significant in TRAD between Set1 and Set5 (p = 0.003), in training (VRT) between Set1 and Set5 (p = 0.001) and in Set5 between the methods (p = 0.047). For power, there was a difference between Set1 and 5 in TRAD (p = 0.016) and VRT (p = 0.002). Conclusion: We conclude that training with currents (VRT) promoted greater muscle fatigue when compared to traditional training.
残奥会举重运动员在固定和可变阻力下的速度、力量和皮肤温度分析
变阻力训练已被广泛用于运动准备。目的分析在训练中使用电流(VRT)和传统方法(TRAD)对速度、力量和体温的影响。方法:14 名残奥会举重运动员14 名残奥会举重运动员参加了为期三周的训练。第 1 周进行了熟悉和 1RM 测试,第 2 周和第 3 周进行了训练前和训练后测试,分别在训练前后 24 小时和 48 小时评估了推进平均速度、力量和体温:在 VRT 前后(P = 0.040)以及 TRAD 和 VRT 48 h 时(P = 0.018),胸骨胸肌温度存在差异;在 VRT 和 TRAD 前后,锁骨胸肌温度存在差异(P = 0.003);TRAD 和 VRT 训练后和训练 48 小时后三角肌前部(p = 0.026 和 p = 0.017);TRAD 和 VRT 训练后和训练 24 小时和训练 48 小时后肱三头肌(p = 0.005)。在训练系列中,在 TRAD 中,Set1 和 Set5 之间的 MPV 有显著差异(p = 0.003);在训练(VRT)中,Set1 和 Set5 之间的 MPV 有显著差异(p = 0.001);在 Set5 中,各种方法之间的 MPV 有显著差异(p = 0.047)。就功率而言,Set1 和 Set5 在 TRAD(p = 0.016)和 VRT(p = 0.002)方面存在差异。结论我们得出的结论是,与传统训练相比,使用电流训练(VRT)更能促进肌肉疲劳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信