Who accessed STI testing in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic and how: Findings from Natsal-COVID, a cross-sectional quasi-representative survey.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Nuria Gallego Marquez,Alison R Howarth,Emily Dema,Fiona Burns,Andrew J Copas,Catherine H Mercer,Pam Sonnenberg,Kirstin R Mitchell,Nigel Field,Jo Gibbs
{"title":"Who accessed STI testing in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic and how: Findings from Natsal-COVID, a cross-sectional quasi-representative survey.","authors":"Nuria Gallego Marquez,Alison R Howarth,Emily Dema,Fiona Burns,Andrew J Copas,Catherine H Mercer,Pam Sonnenberg,Kirstin R Mitchell,Nigel Field,Jo Gibbs","doi":"10.1177/09564624241277582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, online sexual health service delivery increased across Britain. We investigated inequalities in STI testing access and methods of access during the first year of the pandemic.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nNatsal-COVID, an online-survey of people 18-59 years in Britain, explored sexual health experiences in the first year of the pandemic. We describe the socio-demographics of participants who used STI testing services and compare those who reported being \"online service users\", defined as using services with no direct clinician interactions (regardless of whether they also used other methods), with those who were exclusively \"other service users\", defined as face-to-face, telephone, or video calls.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n246/6,064 participants (4.2%) reported STI testing between 03/2020-03/2021. Of those, 35.8% (95%CI 29.2-42.8) used online services. Online service users (compared to other service users) were more often white (74.9% (62.2-84.4) versus 68.5% (59.4-76.3)), less often had anxiety (39.0% (28.4-50.9) versus 57.2% (48.4-65.6)) and less often had disabilities (25.8% (16.8-37.4) versus 48.1% (39.4-56.9)). Among women (only), online users were more often in good health (91.4% (81.3-96.2) versus 69.3% (57.4-79.2)).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nMore than one third of STI testers used online services during this period. Differences exist in the characteristics of people accessing online versus other testing services. These data suggest that online services were more likely to be accessed by groups with typically lower risk of poor sexual health (white and in good health). Further investigation is needed, especially if online services are the only option offered, as differences in ability to access services could widen inequalities.","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":"64 1","pages":"9564624241277582"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624241277582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, online sexual health service delivery increased across Britain. We investigated inequalities in STI testing access and methods of access during the first year of the pandemic. METHODS Natsal-COVID, an online-survey of people 18-59 years in Britain, explored sexual health experiences in the first year of the pandemic. We describe the socio-demographics of participants who used STI testing services and compare those who reported being "online service users", defined as using services with no direct clinician interactions (regardless of whether they also used other methods), with those who were exclusively "other service users", defined as face-to-face, telephone, or video calls. RESULTS 246/6,064 participants (4.2%) reported STI testing between 03/2020-03/2021. Of those, 35.8% (95%CI 29.2-42.8) used online services. Online service users (compared to other service users) were more often white (74.9% (62.2-84.4) versus 68.5% (59.4-76.3)), less often had anxiety (39.0% (28.4-50.9) versus 57.2% (48.4-65.6)) and less often had disabilities (25.8% (16.8-37.4) versus 48.1% (39.4-56.9)). Among women (only), online users were more often in good health (91.4% (81.3-96.2) versus 69.3% (57.4-79.2)). CONCLUSIONS More than one third of STI testers used online services during this period. Differences exist in the characteristics of people accessing online versus other testing services. These data suggest that online services were more likely to be accessed by groups with typically lower risk of poor sexual health (white and in good health). Further investigation is needed, especially if online services are the only option offered, as differences in ability to access services could widen inequalities.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,英国有哪些人接受了性传播感染检测,以及如何进行检测:Natsal-COVID 准代表性横断面调查的结果。
背景在 COVID-19 大流行期间,英国各地的在线性健康服务有所增加。我们调查了大流行第一年性传播感染检测服务的不平等情况以及检测方法。方法SNatsal-COVID 是一项针对英国 18-59 岁人群的在线调查,调查了大流行第一年的性健康体验。我们描述了使用性传播感染检测服务的参与者的社会人口统计学特征,并将那些报告为 "在线服务用户"(定义为使用没有直接临床医生互动的服务(无论他们是否还使用其他方法))的参与者与那些完全为 "其他服务用户"(定义为面对面、电话或视频通话)的参与者进行了比较。其中,35.8%(95%CI 29.2-42.8)使用了在线服务。在线服务用户(与其他服务用户相比)多为白人(74.9%(62.2-84.4)对 68.5%(59.4-76.3)),较少焦虑(39.0%(28.4-50.9)对 57.2%(48.4-65.6)),较少残疾(25.8%(16.8-37.4)对 48.1%(39.4-56.9))。结论超过三分之一的性传播感染检测者在此期间使用过在线服务。使用在线服务和其他检测服务的人群特征存在差异。这些数据表明,性健康状况不佳风险通常较低的人群(白人且健康状况良好)更有可能使用在线服务。需要进一步调查,尤其是如果在线服务是唯一的选择,因为获得服务的能力差异可能会扩大不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信