White Christian Nationalism, Biblical Proof Texting, and Literacy Curriculum and Instruction

IF 3.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mary Juzwik, Rebecca Witte, Kevin Burke, Esther Prins
{"title":"White Christian Nationalism, Biblical Proof Texting, and Literacy Curriculum and Instruction","authors":"Mary Juzwik, Rebecca Witte, Kevin Burke, Esther Prins","doi":"10.1002/rrq.571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If the White Christian nationalist movement has significantly galvanized parent, community, and larger‐scale political groups whose guiding ethos challenges teacher professional roles in shaping literacy curriculum and instruction, then how can literacy teachers and teacher educators better understand this movement, its interpretive orientation to biblical proof texting, and implications for literacy scholarship and education? We focus on the locality of Ottawa County and surrounding areas of western Michigan, where Reformed [Calvinist] Christianity became the dominant ethnoreligious group after Dutch immigrants colonized the area in the 1800s. Grounded in this context, the essay describes the Christian nationalist movement, distinguishing it from the American evangelical movement and exploring the significance of biblical proof texting to it. We then discuss implications of our argument about biblical proof texting and White Christian nationalism, focusing around three questions: (a) What is the significance of naming, identifying, and situating the White Christian nationalist movement (as a type of ethnoreligious nationalism) for literacy stakeholders? (b) How, if at all, can the Bible and biblical interpretation be engaged in US public school literacy classrooms—and other commons concerned with literacy teaching and learning—without embracing “cultural uniformity through coercion”? and (c) How can Christian school literacy educators engage the Bible in ways that challenge White Christian nationalism appropriations of it? We engage these questions by sharing examples from our own teaching and from an elementary teacher whose literacy pedagogy in a Reformed Christian (Calvinist) school in western Michigan gently challenges the core assumptions of this movement and its orientation to biblical interpretation.","PeriodicalId":48160,"journal":{"name":"Reading Research Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If the White Christian nationalist movement has significantly galvanized parent, community, and larger‐scale political groups whose guiding ethos challenges teacher professional roles in shaping literacy curriculum and instruction, then how can literacy teachers and teacher educators better understand this movement, its interpretive orientation to biblical proof texting, and implications for literacy scholarship and education? We focus on the locality of Ottawa County and surrounding areas of western Michigan, where Reformed [Calvinist] Christianity became the dominant ethnoreligious group after Dutch immigrants colonized the area in the 1800s. Grounded in this context, the essay describes the Christian nationalist movement, distinguishing it from the American evangelical movement and exploring the significance of biblical proof texting to it. We then discuss implications of our argument about biblical proof texting and White Christian nationalism, focusing around three questions: (a) What is the significance of naming, identifying, and situating the White Christian nationalist movement (as a type of ethnoreligious nationalism) for literacy stakeholders? (b) How, if at all, can the Bible and biblical interpretation be engaged in US public school literacy classrooms—and other commons concerned with literacy teaching and learning—without embracing “cultural uniformity through coercion”? and (c) How can Christian school literacy educators engage the Bible in ways that challenge White Christian nationalism appropriations of it? We engage these questions by sharing examples from our own teaching and from an elementary teacher whose literacy pedagogy in a Reformed Christian (Calvinist) school in western Michigan gently challenges the core assumptions of this movement and its orientation to biblical interpretation.
白人基督教民族主义、圣经证明文字以及扫盲课程和教学
如果说白人基督教民族主义运动极大地激励了家长、社区和更大规模的政治团体,而这些团体的指导精神对教师在制定扫盲课程和教学中的专业角色提出了挑战,那么扫盲教师和教师教育工作者如何才能更好地理解这一运动、其对圣经证明文本的解释取向以及对扫盲学术和教育的影响?我们将重点放在密歇根州西部的渥太华县及周边地区,19 世纪荷兰移民殖民该地区后,改革宗(加尔文宗)基督教成为该地区的主要民族宗教团体。文章以这一背景为基础,描述了基督教民族主义运动,将其与美国福音派运动区分开来,并探讨了圣经证明文本对其的意义。然后,我们围绕三个问题讨论了我们关于圣经校对文本和白人基督教民族主义的论点的意义:(a) 命名、识别和定位白人基督教民族主义运动(作为一种民族宗教民族主义)对扫盲利益相关者有什么意义?(b) 在美国公立学校的扫盲课堂以及其他与扫盲教学相关的公共场所,如何才能在不接受 "通过强制实现文化统一 "的情况下运用《圣经》和《圣经》阐释? (c) 基督教学校的扫盲教育者如何才能以挑战白人基督教民族主义的方式运用《圣经》?我们将通过分享我们自己的教学实例和一位小学教师的教学实例来探讨这些问题,这位小学教师在密歇根州西部的一所改革宗基督教(加尔文宗)学校中开展扫盲教学,她的扫盲教学法有力地挑战了这一运动的核心假设及其对圣经解释的取向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: For more than 40 years, Reading Research Quarterly has been essential reading for those committed to scholarship on literacy among learners of all ages. The leading research journal in the field, each issue of RRQ includes •Reports of important studies •Multidisciplinary research •Various modes of investigation •Diverse viewpoints on literacy practices, teaching, and learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信