Laura Lopera Congote, Michael M. McGlue, Kevin M. Yeager, Karlyn S. Westover, Jeffery R. Stone
{"title":"Diatom spatial variations in Gull Lake (California) sediments: implications for improving paleolimnological interpretations in small glacial lakes","authors":"Laura Lopera Congote, Michael M. McGlue, Kevin M. Yeager, Karlyn S. Westover, Jeffery R. Stone","doi":"10.1007/s10750-024-05670-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Diatoms have been extensively used as paleolimnological indicators because they acutely respond to changes in their environment. Diatom assemblages recovered from sediment cores are a mixture of benthic and planktic assemblages that may have been transported away from their source environment or deposited near their habitat. Thus, there is an inherent variability in the diatom deposition across the sediments of a lake. With the aim of characterizing this variability and identifying how it may affect palaeoecological reconstructions, we identified diatom communities and assemblages from a series of sediment cores, surface sediment samples, and samples from different lake microenvironments (submerged macrophytes, sediments, marsh, meadow and attached algae). Comparing the sediment cores, we found differences in the timing of diatom assemblage shifts, which we attribute to differences in the diatom distribution in the sediments. Additionally, we identified gradients of diatom deposition where benthic and tychoplanktic diatoms dominate assemblages near shorelines and planktic assemblages dominate toward the lake center. We attribute benthic and tychoplanktic distribution to distance to the source and recognize that diatoms associated with modern microenvironments are underrepresented in the sediments because of their attachment to a substrate.</p>","PeriodicalId":13147,"journal":{"name":"Hydrobiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05670-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Diatoms have been extensively used as paleolimnological indicators because they acutely respond to changes in their environment. Diatom assemblages recovered from sediment cores are a mixture of benthic and planktic assemblages that may have been transported away from their source environment or deposited near their habitat. Thus, there is an inherent variability in the diatom deposition across the sediments of a lake. With the aim of characterizing this variability and identifying how it may affect palaeoecological reconstructions, we identified diatom communities and assemblages from a series of sediment cores, surface sediment samples, and samples from different lake microenvironments (submerged macrophytes, sediments, marsh, meadow and attached algae). Comparing the sediment cores, we found differences in the timing of diatom assemblage shifts, which we attribute to differences in the diatom distribution in the sediments. Additionally, we identified gradients of diatom deposition where benthic and tychoplanktic diatoms dominate assemblages near shorelines and planktic assemblages dominate toward the lake center. We attribute benthic and tychoplanktic distribution to distance to the source and recognize that diatoms associated with modern microenvironments are underrepresented in the sediments because of their attachment to a substrate.
期刊介绍:
Hydrobiologia publishes original research, reviews and opinions regarding the biology of all aquatic environments, including the impact of human activities. We welcome molecular-, organism-, community- and ecosystem-level studies in contributions dealing with limnology and oceanography, including systematics and aquatic ecology. Hypothesis-driven experimental research is preferred, but also theoretical papers or articles with large descriptive content will be considered, provided they are made relevant to a broad hydrobiological audience. Applied aspects will be considered if firmly embedded in an ecological context.