Development and Validation of a Culturally Adapted, Event-related Potential Paradigm for Assessing Alcohol Cue Reactivity and Error Processing in Alcohol Dependence

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Anupa Arunkumar Shenoy, Samir Kumar Praharaj, Shweta Rai, Kirtana R. Nayak, Arun Sasidharan, Hari Prakash Palaniswamy, Chinmay Ajit Suryavanshi, Sumit Sharma, Umesh Shreekantiah, Vrinda Marigowda
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Culturally Adapted, Event-related Potential Paradigm for Assessing Alcohol Cue Reactivity and Error Processing in Alcohol Dependence","authors":"Anupa Arunkumar Shenoy, Samir Kumar Praharaj, Shweta Rai, Kirtana R. Nayak, Arun Sasidharan, Hari Prakash Palaniswamy, Chinmay Ajit Suryavanshi, Sumit Sharma, Umesh Shreekantiah, Vrinda Marigowda","doi":"10.1177/02537176241266879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Research on event-related potentials (ERP) in addiction highlights the importance of cognitive ERP markers, such as P300 and error-related negativity (ERN), in distinguishing between alcohol-dependent patients and healthy controls. We aimed to develop and validate ERP paradigms utilizing culturally validated stimuli to evoke P300 and ERN for the Indian population.Methods:In a cross-sectional study, 16 alcohol-dependent patients and age-matched healthy controls were recruited. For P300, we designed a visual oddball (Go/No-Go) task using culturally appropriate alcohol and non-alcohol-related images. To study ERN, we used the Assessing Neurocognition via Gamified Experimental Logic (ANGEL) task, developed in India, integrating its “game” levels to capture error monitoring with fewer trials. A 32-channel EEG-ERP system was used for data acquisition.Results:Participants showed high engagement in the visual Go/No-Go task, with 94.4% accuracy. The P300 difference wave showed significantly higher amplitudes ( p = .01, Cohen’s d = 0.97) and latencies ( p < .001, Cohen’s d = 1.62) in patients compared to controls at the Pz electrode. No significant group differences were found in accuracy or reaction times for frequent and rare stimuli. In the ANGEL task, patients had a significantly lower ERN difference wave amplitude at the Pz electrode than controls ( p < .001, Cohen’s d = 1.47), with no latency differences. Task accuracy was lower, and reaction time was longer in patients.Conclusions:The visual Go/No-Go task and the ANGEL task are promising tools for understanding the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying alcohol dependence in the Indian context.","PeriodicalId":13476,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176241266879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Research on event-related potentials (ERP) in addiction highlights the importance of cognitive ERP markers, such as P300 and error-related negativity (ERN), in distinguishing between alcohol-dependent patients and healthy controls. We aimed to develop and validate ERP paradigms utilizing culturally validated stimuli to evoke P300 and ERN for the Indian population.Methods:In a cross-sectional study, 16 alcohol-dependent patients and age-matched healthy controls were recruited. For P300, we designed a visual oddball (Go/No-Go) task using culturally appropriate alcohol and non-alcohol-related images. To study ERN, we used the Assessing Neurocognition via Gamified Experimental Logic (ANGEL) task, developed in India, integrating its “game” levels to capture error monitoring with fewer trials. A 32-channel EEG-ERP system was used for data acquisition.Results:Participants showed high engagement in the visual Go/No-Go task, with 94.4% accuracy. The P300 difference wave showed significantly higher amplitudes ( p = .01, Cohen’s d = 0.97) and latencies ( p < .001, Cohen’s d = 1.62) in patients compared to controls at the Pz electrode. No significant group differences were found in accuracy or reaction times for frequent and rare stimuli. In the ANGEL task, patients had a significantly lower ERN difference wave amplitude at the Pz electrode than controls ( p < .001, Cohen’s d = 1.47), with no latency differences. Task accuracy was lower, and reaction time was longer in patients.Conclusions:The visual Go/No-Go task and the ANGEL task are promising tools for understanding the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying alcohol dependence in the Indian context.
开发并验证一种适应不同文化的事件相关电位范式,用于评估酒精依赖症患者的酒精线索反应性和错误处理能力
背景:对成瘾事件相关电位(ERP)的研究强调了认知ERP标记(如P300和错误相关负性(ERN))在区分酒精依赖症患者和健康对照组方面的重要性。方法:在一项横断面研究中,我们招募了 16 名酒精依赖症患者和年龄匹配的健康对照者。为了研究 P300,我们设计了一个视觉怪球(Go/No-Go)任务,使用文化上适当的酒精和非酒精相关图像。为了研究 ERN,我们使用了印度开发的 "通过游戏化实验逻辑评估神经认知"(ANGEL)任务,该任务整合了 "游戏 "水平,以较少的试验次数捕捉错误监测。结果:参与者在视觉 "去/不去 "任务中表现出很高的参与度,准确率达到 94.4%。与对照组相比,患者在 Pz 电极处的 P300 差异波的振幅(p = .01,Cohen's d = 0.97)和潜伏期(p < .001,Cohen's d = 1.62)明显更高。在频繁刺激和罕见刺激的准确性或反应时间方面,没有发现明显的组间差异。在 ANGEL 任务中,患者在 Pz 电极的 ERN 差搏波幅明显低于对照组(p < .001,Cohen's d = 1.47),且无潜伏期差异。结论:视觉 Go/No-Go 任务和 ANGEL 任务是了解印度酒精依赖症神经认知机制的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (ISSN 0253-7176) was started in 1978 as the official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society South Zonal Branch. The journal allows free access (Open Access) and is published Bimonthly. The Journal includes but is not limited to review articles, original research, opinions, and letters. The Editor and publisher accept no legal responsibility for any opinions, omissions or errors by the authors, nor do they approve of any product advertised within the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信