Risk-Aware Quantitative Mineral Prospectivity Mapping with Quantile-based Regression Models

IF 4.8 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jixian Huang, Shijun Wan, Weifang Mao, Hao Deng, Jin Chen, Weiyang Tang
{"title":"Risk-Aware Quantitative Mineral Prospectivity Mapping with Quantile-based Regression Models","authors":"Jixian Huang, Shijun Wan, Weifang Mao, Hao Deng, Jin Chen, Weiyang Tang","doi":"10.1007/s11053-024-10403-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the realm of deep resource exploration, risk is a factor that cannot be neglected. This study innovated existing quantitative mineralization prediction models with consideration of risk. Different from conventional approaches, which primarily focus on the conditional means and show obvious limitations in handling enriched or barren mineralization that deviate significantly from the mean, quantile regression (QR), as a method to predict the conditional distribution instead of conditional means, is expected to break through these limitations and to be used further for risk prediction. Drawing upon data from the Xiadian gold deposit, five geological factors were extracted as explanatory variables and gold grade was used as response variable. Four QR-based regression models were employed to predict the conditional distributions of gold grade. The comprehensive performance evaluation and comparison of these models focus on reliability, clarity, and their combination. The results unequivocally indicate that the quantile regression forest (QRF) model outperformed the other QR-based prediction models. Subsequently, a detailed performance analysis was conducted on the optimal QRF model, followed by a comparison with the RF model to validate its effectiveness. Building upon this foundation, by analyzing the predictive results of QRF models at certain quantiles in unknown regions, several discernible targets were delineated at different risk levels. Overall, this paper introduces the consideration of risk in mineral prospectivity prediction and attempts to predict the conditional distribution of mineralization in deep mineral prospectivity mapping contexts. These insights can offer valuable guidance in identifying optimal targets and in reducing exploration risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":54284,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Research","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10403-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the realm of deep resource exploration, risk is a factor that cannot be neglected. This study innovated existing quantitative mineralization prediction models with consideration of risk. Different from conventional approaches, which primarily focus on the conditional means and show obvious limitations in handling enriched or barren mineralization that deviate significantly from the mean, quantile regression (QR), as a method to predict the conditional distribution instead of conditional means, is expected to break through these limitations and to be used further for risk prediction. Drawing upon data from the Xiadian gold deposit, five geological factors were extracted as explanatory variables and gold grade was used as response variable. Four QR-based regression models were employed to predict the conditional distributions of gold grade. The comprehensive performance evaluation and comparison of these models focus on reliability, clarity, and their combination. The results unequivocally indicate that the quantile regression forest (QRF) model outperformed the other QR-based prediction models. Subsequently, a detailed performance analysis was conducted on the optimal QRF model, followed by a comparison with the RF model to validate its effectiveness. Building upon this foundation, by analyzing the predictive results of QRF models at certain quantiles in unknown regions, several discernible targets were delineated at different risk levels. Overall, this paper introduces the consideration of risk in mineral prospectivity prediction and attempts to predict the conditional distribution of mineralization in deep mineral prospectivity mapping contexts. These insights can offer valuable guidance in identifying optimal targets and in reducing exploration risks.

Abstract Image

基于定量回归模型的风险意识矿产远景定量绘图
在深部资源勘探领域,风险是一个不容忽视的因素。本研究在考虑风险的基础上对现有的定量成矿预测模型进行了创新。传统方法主要关注条件均值,在处理明显偏离均值的富矿化或贫矿化时存在明显的局限性,而量化回归(QR)作为一种预测条件分布而非条件均值的方法,有望突破这些局限性,进一步用于风险预测。利用夏甸金矿的数据,提取五个地质因素作为解释变量,金品位作为响应变量。采用四个基于 QR 的回归模型来预测金品位的条件分布。对这些模型的可靠性、清晰度及其组合进行了全面的性能评估和比较。结果明确显示,量化回归森林(QRF)模型优于其他基于 QR 的预测模型。随后,对最优 QRF 模型进行了详细的性能分析,并与 RF 模型进行了比较,以验证其有效性。在此基础上,通过分析 QRF 模型在未知区域中某些定量的预测结果,在不同的风险水平上划分出了几个可识别的目标。总之,本文介绍了在矿产远景预测中对风险的考虑,并尝试在深部矿产远景测绘背景下预测矿化的条件分布。这些见解可为确定最佳目标和降低勘探风险提供有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Resources Research
Natural Resources Research Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: This journal publishes quantitative studies of natural (mainly but not limited to mineral) resources exploration, evaluation and exploitation, including environmental and risk-related aspects. Typical articles use geoscientific data or analyses to assess, test, or compare resource-related aspects. NRR covers a wide variety of resources including minerals, coal, hydrocarbon, geothermal, water, and vegetation. Case studies are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信