Zifan Lin, Hong Shao, Jun Chen, Wei Yao, Chang Liu, Zhengbiao Jin, Yunxia Li
{"title":"Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Reduces Pain and Improves Internal Rotation after Arthroscopic Capsular Release: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Zifan Lin, Hong Shao, Jun Chen, Wei Yao, Chang Liu, Zhengbiao Jin, Yunxia Li","doi":"10.1155/2024/1940643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. There is still no consensus on the treatment of frozen shoulder (FS). Clinical studies on extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) combined with arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) for FS are still lacking. <i>Objectives</i>. To investigate the effect of ESWT on short-term functional recovery after arthroscopic capsular release (ACR). <i>Methods</i>. A randomized clinical trial including 49 patients who under ACR was included. The patients were assigned to the ESWT group (<i>n</i> = 24) or non-ESWT group (<i>n</i> = 25) 2 weeks after surgery. Routine advanced rehabilitation program are given to all participants, while the ESWT group additionally received 5 times shockwave therapy. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Constant score, University of California Los Angeles score (UCLA), UCLA-satisfaction, and shoulder range of motion (ROM) in four directions of flexion, abduction, internal, and external rotation were analyzed at the baseline (2 weeks postsurgery), 2 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks of follow-up. Repeated measure ANOVA is used to analyze the above outcomes. <i>Results</i>. A total of 46 participants completed all assessments. Pain and function improved in both groups. Comparing between the groups, we found that lower VAS pain scores and higher internal rotation were found in the ESWT group at each follow-up stage (all <i>P</i> < 0.05, 12 weeks VAS-pain 95% CI: [ESWT: 1.55–2.19, non-ESWT: 2.11–2.76], and 12 weeks internal rotation 95% CI: [ESWT: 5.42–7.27, non-ESWT: 7.20–9.06]). Regarding functional scores, the UCLA and UCLA-satisfaction of the ESWT group was significantly higher than that of the control group at 8 weeks and 12 weeks of follow-up (all <i>P</i> < 0.05, 12 weeks UCLA 95% CI: [ESWT: 31.94-33.45, non-ESWT: 27.94-29.45], 12 weeks UCLA-satisfaction 95% CI: [ESWT: 4.32–5.00, non-ESWT: 2.50–4.32]), but there was no significant difference in Constant (<i>P</i> > 0.05, 12 weeks Constant 95% CI: [ESWT: 82.98-92.94, non-ESWT: 78.24–88.20]). <i>Conclusion</i>. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy has a good analgesic effect and improves internal rotation after arthroscopic capsular release through short-term follow-up.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1940643","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1940643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background. There is still no consensus on the treatment of frozen shoulder (FS). Clinical studies on extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) combined with arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) for FS are still lacking. Objectives. To investigate the effect of ESWT on short-term functional recovery after arthroscopic capsular release (ACR). Methods. A randomized clinical trial including 49 patients who under ACR was included. The patients were assigned to the ESWT group (n = 24) or non-ESWT group (n = 25) 2 weeks after surgery. Routine advanced rehabilitation program are given to all participants, while the ESWT group additionally received 5 times shockwave therapy. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Constant score, University of California Los Angeles score (UCLA), UCLA-satisfaction, and shoulder range of motion (ROM) in four directions of flexion, abduction, internal, and external rotation were analyzed at the baseline (2 weeks postsurgery), 2 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks of follow-up. Repeated measure ANOVA is used to analyze the above outcomes. Results. A total of 46 participants completed all assessments. Pain and function improved in both groups. Comparing between the groups, we found that lower VAS pain scores and higher internal rotation were found in the ESWT group at each follow-up stage (all P < 0.05, 12 weeks VAS-pain 95% CI: [ESWT: 1.55–2.19, non-ESWT: 2.11–2.76], and 12 weeks internal rotation 95% CI: [ESWT: 5.42–7.27, non-ESWT: 7.20–9.06]). Regarding functional scores, the UCLA and UCLA-satisfaction of the ESWT group was significantly higher than that of the control group at 8 weeks and 12 weeks of follow-up (all P < 0.05, 12 weeks UCLA 95% CI: [ESWT: 31.94-33.45, non-ESWT: 27.94-29.45], 12 weeks UCLA-satisfaction 95% CI: [ESWT: 4.32–5.00, non-ESWT: 2.50–4.32]), but there was no significant difference in Constant (P > 0.05, 12 weeks Constant 95% CI: [ESWT: 82.98-92.94, non-ESWT: 78.24–88.20]). Conclusion. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy has a good analgesic effect and improves internal rotation after arthroscopic capsular release through short-term follow-up.
期刊介绍:
IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal.
IJCP publishes:
Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed]
Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
International scope
IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.