Pain neuroscience education and motor imagery-based exercise protocol for patients with fibromyalgia: A randomized controlled trial

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Selin Kircali, Öznur Özge Özcan, Mesut Karahan
{"title":"Pain neuroscience education and motor imagery-based exercise protocol for patients with fibromyalgia: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Selin Kircali,&nbsp;Öznur Özge Özcan,&nbsp;Mesut Karahan","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study is a randomized controlled, biopsychosocial study investigating the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education (PNE) and motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP) on fibromyalgia pain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Our study has four groups (MIEP <i>n</i> = 12, PNE <i>n</i> = 12, MIEP + PNE <i>n</i> = 14, Control <i>n</i> = 12) and all participants (<i>n</i> = 50) consist of patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia with chronic back pain. The primary outcome measure was pain intensity, and secondary outcome measures were beliefs, kinesiophobia, anxiety–depression, cognitive–mood, self-esteem, and body awareness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A statistically significant decrease in pain intensity was observed in all experimental groups, without any group being superior (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]: MIEP + PNE <i>p</i> = .003, 95% confidence interval [CI], −4.7078 to −0.9922; MIEP <i>p</i> = .003, 95% CI, −5.4806 to −1.0194; PNE <i>p</i> = .002, 95% CI, −3.6139 to −1.5461). There was a significant improvement in organic beliefs in both groups where PNE was applied (MIEP + PNE: <i>p</i> = .017, 95% CI, −7.8211 to −0.3189; PNE: <i>p</i> = .003, 95% CI, −9.7999 to −0.0401). A significant superiority in organic pain beliefs was detected in the MIEP + PNE group compared to the control group (<i>p</i> = .008, 95% CI, 1.7241–9.4959).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>According to this study, in which MIEP and PNE were combined, there was a decrease in pain intensity when both applications were applied together and when they were applied one by one. MIEP has improved her motor imagery ability, improved pain and increased body awareness. PNE has improved people's organic pain beliefs; removed people from fears, catastrophizing, and negative thoughts about pain; improved easier management of psychological processes and cognitive–emotion regulation ability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study is a randomized controlled, biopsychosocial study investigating the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education (PNE) and motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP) on fibromyalgia pain.

Methods

Our study has four groups (MIEP n = 12, PNE n = 12, MIEP + PNE n = 14, Control n = 12) and all participants (n = 50) consist of patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia with chronic back pain. The primary outcome measure was pain intensity, and secondary outcome measures were beliefs, kinesiophobia, anxiety–depression, cognitive–mood, self-esteem, and body awareness.

Results

A statistically significant decrease in pain intensity was observed in all experimental groups, without any group being superior (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]: MIEP + PNE p = .003, 95% confidence interval [CI], −4.7078 to −0.9922; MIEP p = .003, 95% CI, −5.4806 to −1.0194; PNE p = .002, 95% CI, −3.6139 to −1.5461). There was a significant improvement in organic beliefs in both groups where PNE was applied (MIEP + PNE: p = .017, 95% CI, −7.8211 to −0.3189; PNE: p = .003, 95% CI, −9.7999 to −0.0401). A significant superiority in organic pain beliefs was detected in the MIEP + PNE group compared to the control group (p = .008, 95% CI, 1.7241–9.4959).

Conclusions

According to this study, in which MIEP and PNE were combined, there was a decrease in pain intensity when both applications were applied together and when they were applied one by one. MIEP has improved her motor imagery ability, improved pain and increased body awareness. PNE has improved people's organic pain beliefs; removed people from fears, catastrophizing, and negative thoughts about pain; improved easier management of psychological processes and cognitive–emotion regulation ability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

针对纤维肌痛患者的疼痛神经科学教育和基于运动图像的锻炼方案:随机对照试验
背景 本研究是一项随机对照生物心理社会研究,旨在探讨疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)和基于运动想象的运动方案(MIEP)对纤维肌痛的疗效。 方法 我们的研究分为四组(MIEP=12 组,PNE=12 组,MIEP + PNE=14 组,对照组=12 组),所有参与者(50 人)均为被诊断为纤维肌痛并伴有慢性背痛的患者。主要结果指标为疼痛强度,次要结果指标为信念、运动恐惧、焦虑抑郁、认知情绪、自尊和身体意识。 结果 所有实验组的疼痛强度均有统计学意义上的明显降低,但没有任何一组具有优势(视觉模拟量表 [VAS]:MIEP + PNE p = .003,95% 置信区间[CI],-4.7078 至 -0.9922;MIEP p = .003,95% 置信区间[CI],-5.4806 至 -1.0194;PNE p = .002,95% 置信区间[CI],-3.6139 至 -1.5461)。应用 PNE 的两组患者的器质性信念均有明显改善(MIEP + PNE:p = .017,95% CI,-7.8211 至 -0.3189;PNE:p = .003,95% CI,-9.7999 至 -0.0401)。与对照组相比,MIEP + PNE 组在器质性疼痛信念方面具有明显优势(p = .008,95% CI,1.7241-9.4959)。 结论 根据这项将 MIEP 和 PNE 结合使用的研究,当两种方法同时使用或逐一使用时,疼痛强度均有所降低。MIEP提高了她的运动想象能力,改善了疼痛并增强了身体意识。PNE 改善了人们的有机疼痛信念;消除了人们对疼痛的恐惧、灾难化和消极想法;提高了心理过程的轻松管理和认知-情绪调节能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信