Vessel recovery using ultrasound localisation microscopy: An in silico comparative study between minimum variance and delay-and-sum beamformers

Abstract

The use of particle localisation and tracking algorithms on Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) or other ultrasound mode image data containing sparse microbubble (MB) populations, can produce super-resolved vascularization maps. Typically such data stem from conventional delay and sum (DAS) beamforming that is used widely in ultrasound imaging modes. Recently, adaptive beamforming has shown significant improvement in spatial resolution, but its value to super-resolution image analysis approaches is not fully understood. The in silico study here evaluates the performance of combining minimum variance beamformers (MV BF), established to provide improved lateral resolution, compared to DAS BFs with single particle detection. The isolated effect of a range of simplified image-affecting factors such as flow profile, pulse length, noise, vessel separations and data availability is considered. The study aims to assess the vessel recovery performance using the different beamformers and investigate the link with MB detection and localisation. The MV BF was shown to provide improved microvessel position accuracy compared to conventional DAS BFs. In particular, vessel separations between 0.3–4 λ provided superior localisation uncertainty with the MV. In addition, for a separation of 0.36λ, vessel recovery was achieved with both methods but the use of MV eliminated artifacts that appear as additional vessels. These results were found to be linked to improved MB detection and localisation for the MV BF, which is proposed as suitable for testing in Ultrasound Localisation Microscopy (ULM) imaging using patient data.