Economic and environmental impact analysis of cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture production

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Naveenkumar Rajendran , Troy Runge , Richard D. Bergman , Prakash Nepal , Nithya Nair , Warda Ashraf
{"title":"Economic and environmental impact analysis of cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture production","authors":"Naveenkumar Rajendran ,&nbsp;Troy Runge ,&nbsp;Richard D. Bergman ,&nbsp;Prakash Nepal ,&nbsp;Nithya Nair ,&nbsp;Warda Ashraf","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Incorporating cellulose nanofibers into concrete has a positive impact on its strength. This study evaluated how cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete affected the economic and environmental performance compared to conventional concrete. The estimated minimum selling price per unit mass (m<sup>3</sup>) per unit compressive strength (MPa) of cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture is 12 % lower ($2.52/m<sup>3</sup>/MPa) compared to the minimum selling price of conventional concrete mixture ($2.87/m<sup>3</sup>/MPa). However, when comparing the minimum selling price on a mass basis, the cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture showed a 3.33 % higher minimum selling price ($150/m<sup>3</sup>) than the conventional concrete mixture ($145/m<sup>3</sup>). Similarly, the estimated global warming impact of cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture was higher by 0.59 % when evaluated on a mass basis (509.88 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq<sub>/</sub>m<sup>3</sup>) but 14.5 % lower when evaluated on per m<sup>3</sup> per unit compressive strength basis (8.57 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq/m<sup>3</sup>/MPa), compared to conventional concrete mixture (506.88 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq/m<sup>3</sup> or 10.02 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq/m<sup>3</sup>/MPa).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107917"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492400510X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incorporating cellulose nanofibers into concrete has a positive impact on its strength. This study evaluated how cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete affected the economic and environmental performance compared to conventional concrete. The estimated minimum selling price per unit mass (m3) per unit compressive strength (MPa) of cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture is 12 % lower ($2.52/m3/MPa) compared to the minimum selling price of conventional concrete mixture ($2.87/m3/MPa). However, when comparing the minimum selling price on a mass basis, the cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture showed a 3.33 % higher minimum selling price ($150/m3) than the conventional concrete mixture ($145/m3). Similarly, the estimated global warming impact of cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture was higher by 0.59 % when evaluated on a mass basis (509.88 kg CO2 eq/m3) but 14.5 % lower when evaluated on per m3 per unit compressive strength basis (8.57 kg CO2 eq/m3/MPa), compared to conventional concrete mixture (506.88 kg CO2 eq/m3 or 10.02 kg CO2 eq/m3/MPa).

Abstract Image

纤维素纳米纤维增强混凝土混合物生产的经济和环境影响分析
在混凝土中加入纤维素纳米纤维对其强度有积极影响。与传统混凝土相比,本研究评估了纤维素纳米纤维增强混凝土对经济和环境性能的影响。与传统混凝土混合物的最低售价(2.87 美元/立方米/兆帕)相比,纤维素纳米纤维增强混凝土混合物每单位质量(立方米)每单位抗压强度(兆帕)的最低售价估计低 12%(2.52 美元/立方米/兆帕)。然而,如果按质量比较最低售价,纤维素纳米纤维增强混凝土混合物的最低售价(150 美元/立方米)比传统混凝土混合物(145 美元/立方米)高 3.33%。同样,与传统混凝土混合物(506.88 千克二氧化碳当量/立方米或 10.02 千克二氧化碳当量/立方米/兆帕)相比,按质量(509.88 千克二氧化碳当量/立方米)评估纤维素纳米纤维增强混凝土混合物的全球变暖影响估计值高 0.59%,但按每立方米单位抗压强度(8.57 千克二氧化碳当量/立方米/兆帕)评估则低 14.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信