Naveenkumar Rajendran , Troy Runge , Richard D. Bergman , Prakash Nepal , Nithya Nair , Warda Ashraf
{"title":"Economic and environmental impact analysis of cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture production","authors":"Naveenkumar Rajendran , Troy Runge , Richard D. Bergman , Prakash Nepal , Nithya Nair , Warda Ashraf","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Incorporating cellulose nanofibers into concrete has a positive impact on its strength. This study evaluated how cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete affected the economic and environmental performance compared to conventional concrete. The estimated minimum selling price per unit mass (m<sup>3</sup>) per unit compressive strength (MPa) of cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture is 12 % lower ($2.52/m<sup>3</sup>/MPa) compared to the minimum selling price of conventional concrete mixture ($2.87/m<sup>3</sup>/MPa). However, when comparing the minimum selling price on a mass basis, the cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture showed a 3.33 % higher minimum selling price ($150/m<sup>3</sup>) than the conventional concrete mixture ($145/m<sup>3</sup>). Similarly, the estimated global warming impact of cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture was higher by 0.59 % when evaluated on a mass basis (509.88 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq<sub>/</sub>m<sup>3</sup>) but 14.5 % lower when evaluated on per m<sup>3</sup> per unit compressive strength basis (8.57 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq/m<sup>3</sup>/MPa), compared to conventional concrete mixture (506.88 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq/m<sup>3</sup> or 10.02 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq/m<sup>3</sup>/MPa).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107917"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492400510X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Incorporating cellulose nanofibers into concrete has a positive impact on its strength. This study evaluated how cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete affected the economic and environmental performance compared to conventional concrete. The estimated minimum selling price per unit mass (m3) per unit compressive strength (MPa) of cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture is 12 % lower ($2.52/m3/MPa) compared to the minimum selling price of conventional concrete mixture ($2.87/m3/MPa). However, when comparing the minimum selling price on a mass basis, the cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture showed a 3.33 % higher minimum selling price ($150/m3) than the conventional concrete mixture ($145/m3). Similarly, the estimated global warming impact of cellulose nanofiber-reinforced concrete mixture was higher by 0.59 % when evaluated on a mass basis (509.88 kg CO2 eq/m3) but 14.5 % lower when evaluated on per m3 per unit compressive strength basis (8.57 kg CO2 eq/m3/MPa), compared to conventional concrete mixture (506.88 kg CO2 eq/m3 or 10.02 kg CO2 eq/m3/MPa).
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.