Dating in social anxiety disorder: A daily diary study

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
{"title":"Dating in social anxiety disorder: A daily diary study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Romantic relationships are vital for health, well-being and quality of life, and an increasing percentage of romantic relations begin via use of dating apps and subsequently progress to dates. In the present study we examined dating application use and dates among individuals with SAD (<em>n</em> = 54) and without SAD (n = 54). Our sample included young adults (age range 18 to 33) who were not in a romantic relationship at the time of the study. For both individuals with SAD and without SAD, half of the participants were men, and half were women. We used a daily diary measurement in which participants reported on their dating application use and dates, as well as on concomitant emotions and perceptions for 21 consecutive days. We found that individuals with and without SAD did not differ in the frequency/duration of application use nor in the number of dates attended. However, individuals with SAD experienced dates as more negative compared to individuals without SAD (Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.65). Interestingly, individuals with SAD did not significantly differ in their experience of dates as positive compared to individuals without SAD. Moreover, use of dating applications/going on dates were associated with increases in shame (Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.59) and embarrassment (Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.45) and this was found to a greater extent among individuals with SAD compared to individuals without SAD (Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.50, 0.39 for shame and embarrassment respectively). Findings are discussed in the context of cognitive behavioral models of SAD and implications for treatment are considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524001038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Romantic relationships are vital for health, well-being and quality of life, and an increasing percentage of romantic relations begin via use of dating apps and subsequently progress to dates. In the present study we examined dating application use and dates among individuals with SAD (n = 54) and without SAD (n = 54). Our sample included young adults (age range 18 to 33) who were not in a romantic relationship at the time of the study. For both individuals with SAD and without SAD, half of the participants were men, and half were women. We used a daily diary measurement in which participants reported on their dating application use and dates, as well as on concomitant emotions and perceptions for 21 consecutive days. We found that individuals with and without SAD did not differ in the frequency/duration of application use nor in the number of dates attended. However, individuals with SAD experienced dates as more negative compared to individuals without SAD (Cohen’s d = 0.65). Interestingly, individuals with SAD did not significantly differ in their experience of dates as positive compared to individuals without SAD. Moreover, use of dating applications/going on dates were associated with increases in shame (Cohen’s d = 0.59) and embarrassment (Cohen’s d = 0.45) and this was found to a greater extent among individuals with SAD compared to individuals without SAD (Cohen’s d = 0.50, 0.39 for shame and embarrassment respectively). Findings are discussed in the context of cognitive behavioral models of SAD and implications for treatment are considered.

社交焦虑症患者的约会:每日日记研究
恋爱关系对健康、幸福和生活质量至关重要,越来越多的恋爱关系开始于使用约会应用程序,随后发展为约会。在本研究中,我们调查了患有 SAD(54 人)和未患有 SAD(54 人)的人使用约会应用程序和约会的情况。我们的样本包括在研究期间没有恋爱关系的年轻人(年龄在 18 到 33 岁之间)。在患有 SAD 和未患有 SAD 的人群中,男性和女性各占一半。我们采用每日日记的测量方法,让参与者连续 21 天报告其约会应用程序的使用情况和约会日期,以及伴随的情绪和看法。我们发现,患有和未患有 SAD 的人在使用应用程序的频率/持续时间和参加约会的次数上没有差异。然而,与没有 SAD 的人相比,有 SAD 的人对约会的体验更消极(Cohen's d = 0.65)。有趣的是,与没有 SAD 的人相比,有 SAD 的人对约会的积极体验没有明显差异。此外,使用约会应用程序/进行约会与羞耻感(科恩氏 d = 0.59)和尴尬感(科恩氏 d = 0.45)的增加有关,与没有 SAD 的人相比,SAD 患者的羞耻感和尴尬感增加的程度更大(羞耻感和尴尬感的科恩氏 d 分别为 0.50 和 0.39)。研究结果将在 SAD 认知行为模型的背景下进行讨论,并考虑对治疗的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信