The relation between perceptual retuning and articulatory restructuring: Individual differences in accommodating a novel phonetic variant

IF 1.9 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Patrice Speeter Beddor , Andries W. Coetzee , Ian Calloway , Stephen Tobin , Ruaridh Purse
{"title":"The relation between perceptual retuning and articulatory restructuring: Individual differences in accommodating a novel phonetic variant","authors":"Patrice Speeter Beddor ,&nbsp;Andries W. Coetzee ,&nbsp;Ian Calloway ,&nbsp;Stephen Tobin ,&nbsp;Ruaridh Purse","doi":"10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When language users accommodate a novel phonetic variant, they adjust their perceptual and articulatory spaces in listener- and speaker-specific ways. Motivated by the centrality of accommodation and the perception-production relation to theories of phonetics and sound change, this study tests the hypothesis that individuals who are adept at perceptually retuning for a novel variant will be more accurate imitators of that form. In perceptual eye-tracking and spontaneous imitation ultrasound-imaging tasks, 37 American English participants were exposed to a talker’s novel raised /æ/ before /ɡ/ (<em>bag</em>), and to their familiar unraised /æk/ (<em>back</em>) and /eɪk/ (<em>bake</em>). Consistent with the hypothesis, results showed that the more participants showed perceptual facilitation (i.e., used raised /æ(ɡ)/ to disambiguate <em>back-bag</em> trials), the more they imitated raised /æ(ɡ)/. Perceptual retuning, though, did not predict articulatory restructuring: imitators produced not context-dependent raising, but more general “imitative” raising. For theories of sound change, the findings provide circumscribed support for especially adept perceptual adapters to an innovation having the potential to be strong disseminators of that variant. For theories of accommodation, findings point toward the importance of studying imitation of a targeted variant in the broader context of how talkers and imitators situate that variant in relation to phonetically similar forms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phonetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447024000585/pdfft?md5=897dce2fd42f59ca368b5e7dc02d21a1&pid=1-s2.0-S0095447024000585-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447024000585","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When language users accommodate a novel phonetic variant, they adjust their perceptual and articulatory spaces in listener- and speaker-specific ways. Motivated by the centrality of accommodation and the perception-production relation to theories of phonetics and sound change, this study tests the hypothesis that individuals who are adept at perceptually retuning for a novel variant will be more accurate imitators of that form. In perceptual eye-tracking and spontaneous imitation ultrasound-imaging tasks, 37 American English participants were exposed to a talker’s novel raised /æ/ before /ɡ/ (bag), and to their familiar unraised /æk/ (back) and /eɪk/ (bake). Consistent with the hypothesis, results showed that the more participants showed perceptual facilitation (i.e., used raised /æ(ɡ)/ to disambiguate back-bag trials), the more they imitated raised /æ(ɡ)/. Perceptual retuning, though, did not predict articulatory restructuring: imitators produced not context-dependent raising, but more general “imitative” raising. For theories of sound change, the findings provide circumscribed support for especially adept perceptual adapters to an innovation having the potential to be strong disseminators of that variant. For theories of accommodation, findings point toward the importance of studying imitation of a targeted variant in the broader context of how talkers and imitators situate that variant in relation to phonetically similar forms.

知觉重谐与发音重组之间的关系:适应新语音变体的个体差异
当语言使用者适应一个新的语音变体时,他们会根据听者和说话者的具体情况调整他们的知觉和发音空间。在语音学和音变理论中,调适和感知-生成关系占据着核心地位,受此激励,本研究对以下假设进行了检验:善于对新变体进行感知调适的个体将更准确地模仿该形式。在知觉眼动跟踪和自发模仿超声波成像任务中,37 名美式英语参与者接触了说话者在 /ɡ/(bag)之前发出的新的上扬 /æ/,以及他们熟悉的未上扬 /æk/(back)和 /eɪk/(bake)。结果表明,参与者表现出的知觉促进越多(即使用提高的/æ(ɡ)/来消除背包试验的歧义),他们模仿提高的/æ(ɡ)/的次数就越多,这与假设是一致的。然而,知觉重谐并不能预测发音重组:模仿者产生的不是依赖于语境的提高,而是更普遍的 "模仿性 "提高。就声音变化理论而言,研究结果提供了有限的支持,即特别擅长感知适应创新的人有可能成为该变体的有力传播者。就调适理论而言,研究结果表明,在研究目标变体的模仿时,必须考虑到说话者和模仿者是如何将该变体与语音相似的形式联系起来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
26.30%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Phonetics publishes papers of an experimental or theoretical nature that deal with phonetic aspects of language and linguistic communication processes. Papers dealing with technological and/or pathological topics, or papers of an interdisciplinary nature are also suitable, provided that linguistic-phonetic principles underlie the work reported. Regular articles, review articles, and letters to the editor are published. Themed issues are also published, devoted entirely to a specific subject of interest within the field of phonetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信