Gajasinghe Arachchige Ganga Kavindi, Longlong Tang, Yuma Sasaki
{"title":"Assessing GHG Emission Reduction in Biomass-Derived Biochar Production via Slow Pyrolysis: A Cradle-to-gate LCA Approach","authors":"Gajasinghe Arachchige Ganga Kavindi, Longlong Tang, Yuma Sasaki","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biochar, a potent negative emission technology (NET), sequesters carbon through biomass thermochemical conversion. Despite greenhouse gas (GHG) storage in biochar being well-understood, analyzing GHG emissions during production is challenging due to diverse carbonization methods. We utilized life cycle assessment (LCA) to address this complexity. In a literature survey, we analyzed contemporary biochar LCA studies, extracting GHG data for emission factor (EF) determination. A scenario-specific case study assesses GHG emission reduction in crop residue-derived biochar. Key factors influencing biochar emissions include feedstock type, surplus energy use, and carbonization scale. Biochar contains EFs ranging from −1.10 to 0.68 ton-CO<sub>2</sub>e/ton-biochar. The case study demonstrates that biochar total abatements span from −625,775 to −215,712 ton-CO<sub>2</sub>e/year (derived from 840,000 ton-crop residue/year). While overall emission reduction relies on GHG storage, carbonization emissions significantly contribute to total emission diversity. The study proposes a meticulous LCA approach for realistic biochar production, crucial for assessing carbon crediting or offsetting schemes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107900"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924004932/pdfft?md5=87f3ef919f7716248be79f371c093d22&pid=1-s2.0-S0921344924004932-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924004932","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biochar, a potent negative emission technology (NET), sequesters carbon through biomass thermochemical conversion. Despite greenhouse gas (GHG) storage in biochar being well-understood, analyzing GHG emissions during production is challenging due to diverse carbonization methods. We utilized life cycle assessment (LCA) to address this complexity. In a literature survey, we analyzed contemporary biochar LCA studies, extracting GHG data for emission factor (EF) determination. A scenario-specific case study assesses GHG emission reduction in crop residue-derived biochar. Key factors influencing biochar emissions include feedstock type, surplus energy use, and carbonization scale. Biochar contains EFs ranging from −1.10 to 0.68 ton-CO2e/ton-biochar. The case study demonstrates that biochar total abatements span from −625,775 to −215,712 ton-CO2e/year (derived from 840,000 ton-crop residue/year). While overall emission reduction relies on GHG storage, carbonization emissions significantly contribute to total emission diversity. The study proposes a meticulous LCA approach for realistic biochar production, crucial for assessing carbon crediting or offsetting schemes.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.