Atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in-situ, flat epithelial atypia, and future risk of developing breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jannah Baker , Naomi Noguchi , M Luke Marinovich , Brian L. Sprague , Elizabeth Salisbury , Nehmat Houssami
{"title":"Atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in-situ, flat epithelial atypia, and future risk of developing breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jannah Baker ,&nbsp;Naomi Noguchi ,&nbsp;M Luke Marinovich ,&nbsp;Brian L. Sprague ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Salisbury ,&nbsp;Nehmat Houssami","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Biopsy-proven breast lesions such as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and flat epithelial atypia (FEA) increase subsequent risk of breast cancer (BC), but long-term risk has not been synthesized. A systematic review was conducted to quantify future risk of breast cancer accounting for time since diagnosis of these high-risk lesions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search of literature from 2000 was performed to identify studies reporting BC as an outcome following core-needle or excision biopsy histology diagnosis of ADH, ALH, LCIS, lobular neoplasia (LN) or FEA. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate cumulative BC incidence at five-yearly intervals following initial diagnosis for each histology type.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy studies reporting on 47,671 subjects met eligibility criteria. BC incidence at five years post-diagnosis with a high-risk lesion was estimated to be 9.3 % (95 % CI 6.9–12.5 %) for LCIS, 6.6 % (95 % CI 4.4–9.7 %) for ADH, 9.7 % (95 % CI 5.3–17.2 %) for ALH, 8.6 % (95 % CI 6.5–11.4 %) for LN, and 3.8 % (95 % CI 1.2–11.7 %) for FEA. At ten years post-diagnosis, BC incidence was estimated to be 11.8 % (95 % CI 9.0–15.3 %) for LCIS, 13.9 % (95 % CI 7.8–23.6 %) for ADH, 15.4 % (95 % CI 7.2–29.3 %) for ALH, 17.0 % (95 % CI 7.2–35.3 %) for LN and 7.2 % (95 % CI 2.2–21.2 %) for FEA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings demonstrate increased BC risk sustained over time since initial diagnosis of high-risk breast lesions, varying by lesion type, with relatively less evidence for FEA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 103807"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624001383/pdfft?md5=90f4ed83118422b63c55aacd89e17b30&pid=1-s2.0-S0960977624001383-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624001383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Biopsy-proven breast lesions such as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and flat epithelial atypia (FEA) increase subsequent risk of breast cancer (BC), but long-term risk has not been synthesized. A systematic review was conducted to quantify future risk of breast cancer accounting for time since diagnosis of these high-risk lesions.

Methods

A systematic search of literature from 2000 was performed to identify studies reporting BC as an outcome following core-needle or excision biopsy histology diagnosis of ADH, ALH, LCIS, lobular neoplasia (LN) or FEA. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate cumulative BC incidence at five-yearly intervals following initial diagnosis for each histology type.

Results

Seventy studies reporting on 47,671 subjects met eligibility criteria. BC incidence at five years post-diagnosis with a high-risk lesion was estimated to be 9.3 % (95 % CI 6.9–12.5 %) for LCIS, 6.6 % (95 % CI 4.4–9.7 %) for ADH, 9.7 % (95 % CI 5.3–17.2 %) for ALH, 8.6 % (95 % CI 6.5–11.4 %) for LN, and 3.8 % (95 % CI 1.2–11.7 %) for FEA. At ten years post-diagnosis, BC incidence was estimated to be 11.8 % (95 % CI 9.0–15.3 %) for LCIS, 13.9 % (95 % CI 7.8–23.6 %) for ADH, 15.4 % (95 % CI 7.2–29.3 %) for ALH, 17.0 % (95 % CI 7.2–35.3 %) for LN and 7.2 % (95 % CI 2.2–21.2 %) for FEA.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate increased BC risk sustained over time since initial diagnosis of high-risk breast lesions, varying by lesion type, with relatively less evidence for FEA.

非典型导管或小叶增生、小叶原位癌、扁平上皮不典型性与未来罹患乳腺癌的风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景经活检证实的乳腺病变,如非典型导管增生(ADH)或非典型小叶增生(ALH)、小叶原位癌(LCIS)和扁平上皮不典型性(FEA)会增加罹患乳腺癌(BC)的风险,但长期风险尚未得到综合分析。研究人员对 2000 年以来的文献进行了系统性检索,以确定在核心针或切除活检组织学诊断为 ADH、ALH、LCIS、小叶肿瘤(LN)或 FEA 后,将 BC 作为结果之一进行报告的研究。对每种组织学类型进行了元分析,以估计初次诊断后每五年的累积 BC 发病率。据估计,LCIS、ADH、ALH、LN、FEA诊断后五年的高危病变 BC 发病率分别为 9.3% (95 % CI 6.9-12.5%)、6.6% (95 % CI 4.4-9.7%)、9.7% (95 % CI 5.3-17.2%)、8.6% (95 % CI 6.5-11.4%)、3.8% (95 % CI 1.2-11.7%)。在诊断后十年,LCIS 的 BC 发病率估计为 11.8 %(95 % CI 9.0-15.3%),ADH 为 13.9 %(95 % CI 7.8-23.6%),ALH 为 15.4 %(95 % CI 7.2-29.3%),LN 为 17.0 %(95 % CI 7.2-35.3%),FEA 为 7.2 %(95 % CI 2.2-11.7%)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,自初次诊断出高危乳腺病变以来,随着时间的推移,BC 风险会持续增加,病变类型各不相同,而 FEA 的证据相对较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast
Breast 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Breast is an international, multidisciplinary journal for researchers and clinicians, which focuses on translational and clinical research for the advancement of breast cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信