Barrier assessment of EV business model innovation in China: An MCDM-based FMEA

IF 7.3 1区工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2024.104404

{"title":"Barrier assessment of EV business model innovation in China: An MCDM-based FMEA","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2024.104404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Business model innovation is imperative for electric vehicles (EVs) firms to maintain a competitive edge and the transition towards transportation electrification. However, numerous socio-technical barriers are likely to impede this innovation process. This study aims to assess the risks of various barriers through a novel fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM)-based failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) model. To accomplish this, a panel of experts was convened to identify potential barriers, prioritizing risk criteria by interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFSs) and analytic hierarchy process, and utilizing the IVIF-improved grey relational projection for evaluating and ranking barriers. The model underscores the importance of considering the unique characteristics of EV business model innovation, and a hierarchical system of risk criteria for evaluating barriers is formulated based on the traditional risk factors of FMEA. The findings corroborate that ‘blocked network nodes’, ‘unprofitable revenue models’, and ‘inadequate market segmentation’ are the foremost barriers in China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920924003614","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Business model innovation is imperative for electric vehicles (EVs) firms to maintain a competitive edge and the transition towards transportation electrification. However, numerous socio-technical barriers are likely to impede this innovation process. This study aims to assess the risks of various barriers through a novel fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM)-based failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) model. To accomplish this, a panel of experts was convened to identify potential barriers, prioritizing risk criteria by interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFSs) and analytic hierarchy process, and utilizing the IVIF-improved grey relational projection for evaluating and ranking barriers. The model underscores the importance of considering the unique characteristics of EV business model innovation, and a hierarchical system of risk criteria for evaluating barriers is formulated based on the traditional risk factors of FMEA. The findings corroborate that ‘blocked network nodes’, ‘unprofitable revenue models’, and ‘inadequate market segmentation’ are the foremost barriers in China.

查看原文本刊更多论文

中国电动汽车商业模式创新的障碍评估：基于 MCDM 的 FMEA

电动汽车（EV）企业要保持竞争优势并向交通电气化转型，就必须进行商业模式创新。然而，许多社会技术障碍可能会阻碍这一创新进程。本研究旨在通过一种基于模糊多重标准决策（MCDM）的新型故障模式与影响分析（FMEA）模型，评估各种障碍的风险。为此，召集了一个专家小组来确定潜在的障碍，通过区间值直观模糊集（IVIFS）和层次分析法来确定风险标准的优先次序，并利用 IVIF 改进的灰色关系投影来评估和排列障碍。该模型强调了考虑电动汽车商业模式创新独特性的重要性，并在 FMEA 传统风险因素的基础上，制定了评估障碍的分层风险标准体系。研究结果证实，在中国，"网络节点受阻"、"收入模式无利可图 "和 "市场细分不足 "是最主要的障碍。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment 工程技术-运输科技

CiteScore

14.40

自引率

9.20%

发文量

314

审稿时长

39 days

期刊介绍： Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution. We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.