Does industrial land marketization reform faciliate urban land use efficiency?

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
{"title":"Does industrial land marketization reform faciliate urban land use efficiency?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2024.103609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As a key input factor and necessary space carrier for the development of various industries in the city, the market allocation mode of industrial land has a great impact on the land use efficiency of the whole city. This paper objectively evaluates the actual effect of industrial land marketization policy on urban land use efficiency, and finds that industrial land marketization reform further reflects land value, releases land dividend, increases land transfer income of local governments, and expands funds for land consolidation and development, thus effectively improving urban land use efficiency. By using the Slack-Based-Measure (SBM) model to evaluate the effective decision-making unit to measure the land use efficiency, and using the spatial Durbin difference-in-difference method to estimate the effect of industrial land marketization policy on improving urban land use efficiency in 2007, the main conclusions are as follows: (1) After using the static spatial difference-in-difference model and the dynamic spatial difference-in-difference model, it is found that the industrial land marketization policy implemented in 2007 significantly improved the urban land use efficiency. (2) The moderating effect shows that fiscal pressure has a negative impact on the positive role of industrial land marketization in improving urban land use efficiency, and promotion incentives have a positive impact on the positive role of industrial land marketization in improving urban land use efficiency. (3) Mechanism analysis shows that the market-oriented reform of industrial land will improve the efficiency of urban land use by promoting the upgrading of industrial structure and curbing real estate investment. The above research conclusions provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the allocation mode, management system and revenue and expenditure structure of industrial land transfer, improving the long-term assessment system of local governments, promoting the optimization and upgrading of industrial structure, and improving the unsustainable development of cities caused by excessive real estate investment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024006014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a key input factor and necessary space carrier for the development of various industries in the city, the market allocation mode of industrial land has a great impact on the land use efficiency of the whole city. This paper objectively evaluates the actual effect of industrial land marketization policy on urban land use efficiency, and finds that industrial land marketization reform further reflects land value, releases land dividend, increases land transfer income of local governments, and expands funds for land consolidation and development, thus effectively improving urban land use efficiency. By using the Slack-Based-Measure (SBM) model to evaluate the effective decision-making unit to measure the land use efficiency, and using the spatial Durbin difference-in-difference method to estimate the effect of industrial land marketization policy on improving urban land use efficiency in 2007, the main conclusions are as follows: (1) After using the static spatial difference-in-difference model and the dynamic spatial difference-in-difference model, it is found that the industrial land marketization policy implemented in 2007 significantly improved the urban land use efficiency. (2) The moderating effect shows that fiscal pressure has a negative impact on the positive role of industrial land marketization in improving urban land use efficiency, and promotion incentives have a positive impact on the positive role of industrial land marketization in improving urban land use efficiency. (3) Mechanism analysis shows that the market-oriented reform of industrial land will improve the efficiency of urban land use by promoting the upgrading of industrial structure and curbing real estate investment. The above research conclusions provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the allocation mode, management system and revenue and expenditure structure of industrial land transfer, improving the long-term assessment system of local governments, promoting the optimization and upgrading of industrial structure, and improving the unsustainable development of cities caused by excessive real estate investment.

工业用地市场化改革是否有助于提高城市土地利用效率?
工业用地作为城市各类产业发展的关键投入要素和必要空间载体,其市场化配置模式对整个城市的土地利用效率影响巨大。本文客观评价了工业用地市场化政策对城市土地利用效率的实际影响,发现工业用地市场化改革进一步体现了土地价值,释放了土地红利,增加了地方政府的土地出让收入,扩大了土地整理开发资金,从而有效提高了城市土地利用效率。利用基于松弛的测度模型(SBM)评价有效决策单元来测度土地利用效率,利用空间杜宾差分法估计 2007 年工业用地市场化政策对提高城市土地利用效率的影响,主要结论如下:(1)使用静态空间差分模型和动态空间差分模型后发现,2007 年实施的工业用地市场化政策显著提高了城市土地利用效率。(2)调节效应表明,财政压力对工业用地市场化提高城市土地利用效率的积极作用具有负向影响,而促进激励对工业用地市场化提高城市土地利用效率的积极作用具有正向影响。(3)机理分析表明,工业用地市场化改革将通过促进产业结构升级和抑制房地产投资来提高城市土地利用效率。上述研究结论为优化工业用地出让的配置方式、管理体制和收支结构,完善地方政府的长效考核体系,促进产业结构优化升级,改善过度房地产投资导致的城市不可持续发展提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信