{"title":"Predation risk in a migratory butterfly increases southward along a latitudinal gradient","authors":"Constanti Stefanescu, Clàudia Pla‐Narbona, Andreu Ubach, Crinan Jarrett, Justinn Renelies‐Hamilton, Pau Colom","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In migratory insects performing multigenerational migration, such as the painted lady butterfly <jats:italic>Vanessa cardui</jats:italic>, successive generations face a wide variety of predator communities and may be subject to different predation risks. Here, we analyze the pattern of wing damage of over 2000 butterflies to investigate, for the first time, the risk of predation of adult painted ladies across a latitudinal range of ca 3500 km extending from the northern Mediterranean through the Maghreb to sub‐Saharan West Africa. Large number of butterflies showed substantial wing damage attributable to failed attacks, with birds, mantids and lizards being the most likely predators. The risk of attack increased towards the equator, even after controlling for wing wear. In addition, there was a strong effect of butterfly size on predation risk, with larger butterflies facing a higher risk compared to their smaller counterparts, and clear evidence that females suffered more attacks than males. Although size is a major factor, latitude was a stronger predictor of predation risk across the migratory system, as evidenced by greater wing damage in butterflies at lower latitudes, even though their size notably decreased. These results raise an interesting evolutionary conflict, with a tradeoff between size and predation risk, as larger butterflies are likely to be more fecund and efficient in migratory flight but, at the same time, more vulnerable to predation.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07308","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In migratory insects performing multigenerational migration, such as the painted lady butterfly Vanessa cardui, successive generations face a wide variety of predator communities and may be subject to different predation risks. Here, we analyze the pattern of wing damage of over 2000 butterflies to investigate, for the first time, the risk of predation of adult painted ladies across a latitudinal range of ca 3500 km extending from the northern Mediterranean through the Maghreb to sub‐Saharan West Africa. Large number of butterflies showed substantial wing damage attributable to failed attacks, with birds, mantids and lizards being the most likely predators. The risk of attack increased towards the equator, even after controlling for wing wear. In addition, there was a strong effect of butterfly size on predation risk, with larger butterflies facing a higher risk compared to their smaller counterparts, and clear evidence that females suffered more attacks than males. Although size is a major factor, latitude was a stronger predictor of predation risk across the migratory system, as evidenced by greater wing damage in butterflies at lower latitudes, even though their size notably decreased. These results raise an interesting evolutionary conflict, with a tradeoff between size and predation risk, as larger butterflies are likely to be more fecund and efficient in migratory flight but, at the same time, more vulnerable to predation.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.