Vorasidenib: a new hope or a false promise for patients with low-grade glioma?

IF 81.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Stanislav Lazarev, Kunal K. Sindhu
{"title":"Vorasidenib: a new hope or a false promise for patients with low-grade glioma?","authors":"Stanislav Lazarev, Kunal K. Sindhu","doi":"10.1038/s41571-024-00944-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite recent FDA approval, the clinical utility of vorasidenib in the treatment of IDH-mutant low-grade gliomas remains unclear. Herein, we critique the pivotal trial of vorasidenib, and highlight the questionable choice of control intervention and end points, ethical concerns, as well as the uncertain efficacy observed, and argue that the approval might be premature given the high cost of this drug and lack of clear benefit over standard treatments.","PeriodicalId":19079,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":81.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-024-00944-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite recent FDA approval, the clinical utility of vorasidenib in the treatment of IDH-mutant low-grade gliomas remains unclear. Herein, we critique the pivotal trial of vorasidenib, and highlight the questionable choice of control intervention and end points, ethical concerns, as well as the uncertain efficacy observed, and argue that the approval might be premature given the high cost of this drug and lack of clear benefit over standard treatments.
Vorasidenib:低级别胶质瘤患者的新希望还是虚假承诺?
尽管最近获得了美国食品药品管理局的批准,但vorasidenib治疗IDH突变低级别胶质瘤的临床效用仍不明确。在此,我们对vorasidenib的关键性试验进行了评论,并强调了对照干预和终点选择的问题、伦理问题以及观察到的不确定疗效,并认为鉴于该药物的高昂成本以及与标准疗法相比缺乏明显疗效,批准该药物的时机可能还不成熟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
99.40
自引率
0.40%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews publishes clinical content authored by internationally renowned clinical academics and researchers, catering to readers in the medical sciences at postgraduate levels and beyond. Although targeted at practicing doctors, researchers, and academics within specific specialties, the aim is to ensure accessibility for readers across various medical disciplines. The journal features in-depth Reviews offering authoritative and current information, contextualizing topics within the history and development of a field. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section provide topical discussions, opinions, and filtered primary research from diverse medical journals.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信