Descriptive analysis of recommendations made by county-level overdose fatality review teams in indiana to combat the opioid epidemic

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
{"title":"Descriptive analysis of recommendations made by county-level overdose fatality review teams in indiana to combat the opioid epidemic","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Overdose fatality review teams (OFRTs) are becoming more common across U.S. communities as a means of addressing the overdose epidemic and improving local overdose prevention strategies; however, empirical examinations of the work of OFRTs are lacking. The current study seeks to characterize recommendations for local overdose prevention strategies made by county-level OFRTs across Indiana in order to understand their practices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative descriptive content analysis was conducted on recommendations made by 19 county-level OFRTs across Indiana in 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>OFRTs generated 1512 recommendations during 2022 based on case reviews of 291 overdose deaths occurring across 19 Indiana counties; of those, 26.8 % (n=405) were specific to the case reviewed, rather than relevant to the broader community, and were not further coded. The remaining 1109 recommendations were coded according to their overall scope, recommendation strategy, and target agency. The most common recommendations addressed substance use more broadly (e.g., improving substance use screening/assessment in healthcare settings), followed by recommendations directly addressing overdose risk (e.g., naloxone distribution, increasing harm reduction programs). Other common recommendations related to mental health, OFRT practices, and addressing social determinants of health. Common recommendation strategies were to implement new services or service improvements.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results highlight the extent of further efforts needed to improve overdose prevention and the need for further research and support of OFRTs across the United States.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871624013395","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Overdose fatality review teams (OFRTs) are becoming more common across U.S. communities as a means of addressing the overdose epidemic and improving local overdose prevention strategies; however, empirical examinations of the work of OFRTs are lacking. The current study seeks to characterize recommendations for local overdose prevention strategies made by county-level OFRTs across Indiana in order to understand their practices.

Methods

A qualitative descriptive content analysis was conducted on recommendations made by 19 county-level OFRTs across Indiana in 2022.

Results

OFRTs generated 1512 recommendations during 2022 based on case reviews of 291 overdose deaths occurring across 19 Indiana counties; of those, 26.8 % (n=405) were specific to the case reviewed, rather than relevant to the broader community, and were not further coded. The remaining 1109 recommendations were coded according to their overall scope, recommendation strategy, and target agency. The most common recommendations addressed substance use more broadly (e.g., improving substance use screening/assessment in healthcare settings), followed by recommendations directly addressing overdose risk (e.g., naloxone distribution, increasing harm reduction programs). Other common recommendations related to mental health, OFRT practices, and addressing social determinants of health. Common recommendation strategies were to implement new services or service improvements.

Conclusion

Results highlight the extent of further efforts needed to improve overdose prevention and the need for further research and support of OFRTs across the United States.

印第安纳州县级用药过量致死审查小组为应对阿片类药物流行所提建议的描述性分析
用药过量致死审查小组(OFRTs)作为应对用药过量流行病和改进当地用药过量预防策略的一种手段,在美国各社区越来越普遍;然而,对 OFRTs 工作的实证研究却很缺乏。本研究试图描述印第安纳州县级药物过量预防小组对当地药物过量预防策略所提建议的特点,以了解他们的做法。方法对印第安纳州 19 个县级药物过量预防小组在 2022 年提出的建议进行了定性描述性内容分析。结果药物过量预防小组在 2022 年期间根据对印第安纳州 19 个县发生的 291 例药物过量死亡病例的审查提出了 1512 条建议;其中 26.8 %(n=405)的建议是针对所审查的病例提出的,而不是与更广泛的社区相关,因此没有进一步编码。其余 1109 条建议根据其总体范围、建议策略和目标机构进行了编码。最常见的建议涉及更广泛的药物使用问题(如改善医疗机构的药物使用筛查/评估),其次是直接针对用药过量风险的建议(如纳洛酮的分发、增加减低伤害计划)。其他常见建议涉及心理健康、OFRT 实践以及解决健康的社会决定因素。常见的建议策略是实施新的服务或改进服务。结论:研究结果突出表明,需要进一步努力改进用药过量预防工作,并需要在全美范围内进一步研究和支持 OFRT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence
Drug and alcohol dependence 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
409
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信