Public and private institutional arrangements for early generation seed production: Cassava seed value chains in Southeast Asia

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Erik Delaquis , Conny J.M. Almekinders , Stef de Haan , Jonathan C. Newby , Cu Thi Le Thuy , Pao Srean , Wannasiri Wannarat , Pornsak Aiemnaka , Chareinsuk Rojanaridpiched , Pham Thi Nhan , Phalla Kang , Paul C. Struik
{"title":"Public and private institutional arrangements for early generation seed production: Cassava seed value chains in Southeast Asia","authors":"Erik Delaquis ,&nbsp;Conny J.M. Almekinders ,&nbsp;Stef de Haan ,&nbsp;Jonathan C. Newby ,&nbsp;Cu Thi Le Thuy ,&nbsp;Pao Srean ,&nbsp;Wannasiri Wannarat ,&nbsp;Pornsak Aiemnaka ,&nbsp;Chareinsuk Rojanaridpiched ,&nbsp;Pham Thi Nhan ,&nbsp;Phalla Kang ,&nbsp;Paul C. Struik","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Early generation seed (EGS) production and delivery pathways are critical components of so-called formal seed systems, of principal importance in the release of improved varieties into national seed systems. Vegetatively propagated crops (VPCs), with clonal reproductive ability and considerable differences in production and dissemination patterns from sexually propagated crops, often challenge generalized assumptions about ‘business models’ for private sector-led EGS production.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>We evaluate production trends and institutional arrangements for early generation ‘seed’ (stem cutting) production in the Greater Mekong Subregion of Southeast Asia to compare models, stakeholders, production pathways, and economic efficiency. We systematically document three cases of formal EGS production underpinning this globally important agricultural commodity, and contextualize their development in regional cassava production trends. We then interrogate whether the observed models support common assumptions in contemporary debates about how VPC seed system development, in particular the logic of public and private participation.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>To contextualize EGS initiatives, we compiled district-level production data and processing factory locations from national sources across the Greater Mekong subregion, paired with data on varietal releases and international trade of cassava products. To evaluate institutional arrangements for cassava EGS production in this context, we conducted ten key informant interviews with stakeholders involved with three case studies in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam. Using a seed value chains framework, we compared institutional participation, seed multiplication practices, and partial budgets of each case.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>The three cases represent diverse institutional arrangements that don't exhibit seed company-led, profit-motivated structures often recommended by experts. Despite the commercial nature of export-oriented Southeast Asian cassava products, public involvement remained central in cassava breeding and EGS delivery models, implemented via different actors and multiplication stages. Case histories and partial production budgets describe institutional arrangements with variable points of subsidy along the value chain, resulting in positive effects on varietal turnover and cassava production across the region.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>While private sector involvement was significant and variable, public involvement remains important, even for highly commercialized crops like cassava. Contrary to common assumptions, successful cassava EGS systems in Southeast Asia have initiated impressive impacts without pursuing conventionally profit-oriented seed business models. Value chain approaches reveal backing EGS yields tangible downstream benefits, but for VPCs additional innovations are required to ensure benefits support the sustainability of expensive upstream multiplication stages. Approaches considering institutional participation along seed and product value chains can identify mechanisms for doing so beyond conventional seed commercialization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 104131"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002816","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

Early generation seed (EGS) production and delivery pathways are critical components of so-called formal seed systems, of principal importance in the release of improved varieties into national seed systems. Vegetatively propagated crops (VPCs), with clonal reproductive ability and considerable differences in production and dissemination patterns from sexually propagated crops, often challenge generalized assumptions about ‘business models’ for private sector-led EGS production.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluate production trends and institutional arrangements for early generation ‘seed’ (stem cutting) production in the Greater Mekong Subregion of Southeast Asia to compare models, stakeholders, production pathways, and economic efficiency. We systematically document three cases of formal EGS production underpinning this globally important agricultural commodity, and contextualize their development in regional cassava production trends. We then interrogate whether the observed models support common assumptions in contemporary debates about how VPC seed system development, in particular the logic of public and private participation.

METHODS

To contextualize EGS initiatives, we compiled district-level production data and processing factory locations from national sources across the Greater Mekong subregion, paired with data on varietal releases and international trade of cassava products. To evaluate institutional arrangements for cassava EGS production in this context, we conducted ten key informant interviews with stakeholders involved with three case studies in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam. Using a seed value chains framework, we compared institutional participation, seed multiplication practices, and partial budgets of each case.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The three cases represent diverse institutional arrangements that don't exhibit seed company-led, profit-motivated structures often recommended by experts. Despite the commercial nature of export-oriented Southeast Asian cassava products, public involvement remained central in cassava breeding and EGS delivery models, implemented via different actors and multiplication stages. Case histories and partial production budgets describe institutional arrangements with variable points of subsidy along the value chain, resulting in positive effects on varietal turnover and cassava production across the region.

SIGNIFICANCE

While private sector involvement was significant and variable, public involvement remains important, even for highly commercialized crops like cassava. Contrary to common assumptions, successful cassava EGS systems in Southeast Asia have initiated impressive impacts without pursuing conventionally profit-oriented seed business models. Value chain approaches reveal backing EGS yields tangible downstream benefits, but for VPCs additional innovations are required to ensure benefits support the sustainability of expensive upstream multiplication stages. Approaches considering institutional participation along seed and product value chains can identify mechanisms for doing so beyond conventional seed commercialization.

Abstract Image

早期种子生产的公共和私营机构安排:东南亚木薯种子价值链
内容提要早期种子(EGS)的生产和交付途径是所谓正规种子系统的关键组成部分,在向国家种子系统发布改良品种方面具有重要意义。无性繁殖作物(VPCs)具有克隆繁殖能力,其生产和传播模式与有性繁殖作物有很大不同,这往往对私营部门主导的早繁种子生产 "商业模式 "的一般假设提出了挑战。 目标我们评估了东南亚大湄公河次区域早繁种子(茎切)生产的趋势和制度安排,以比较模式、利益相关者、生产途径和经济效益。我们系统地记录了支持这一全球重要农产品的三个正规 EGS 生产案例,并将其发展与地区木薯生产趋势相结合。然后,我们探讨了所观察到的模式是否支持当代关于如何发展 VPC 种子系统的辩论中的共同假设,特别是公共和私人参与的逻辑。方法为了将 EGS 举措与背景联系起来,我们汇编了来自大湄公河次区域各国的地区级生产数据和加工厂位置,以及关于木薯品种发布和木薯产品国际贸易的数据。为了评估木薯 EGS 生产的制度安排,我们对参与柬埔寨、泰国和越南三个案例研究的利益相关者进行了十次关键信息访谈。利用种子价值链框架,我们对每个案例的机构参与、种子繁殖实践和部分预算进行了比较。结果和结论这三个案例代表了不同的机构安排,它们并没有表现出专家通常建议的种子公司主导、以利润为导向的结构。尽管东南亚木薯产品以出口为导向,具有商业性质,但公众参与仍是木薯育种和 EGS 交付模式的核心,通过不同的参与者和繁殖阶段来实施。案例历史和部分生产预算描述了价值链上不同补贴点的制度安排,从而对整个地区的品种更替和木薯生产产生了积极影响。与通常的假设相反,东南亚成功的木薯 EGS 系统并没有采用传统的以利润为导向的种子商业模式,却产生了令人印象深刻的影响。价值链方法显示,支持环境商品和服务可产生有形的下游效益,但对于虚拟生产者保护区来说,还需要额外的创新,以确保效益支持昂贵的上游繁殖阶段的可持续性。考虑到种子和产品价值链上的机构参与的方法可以确定超越传统种子商业化的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信